{"article":{"id":16654,"heading":"GREENS SAY NO TO BUSH'S MARRIAGE PROPOSAL","author":"Green Party Media Team","created":"2002-05-16 02:39:38","modified":"2005-08-15 00:58:25","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:58:25","article":"<p>THE GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES <br><br> MEDIA ADVISORY <br>  <br> For immediate release: <br>  <br> Tuesday, May 14, 2002 <br><br> Contacts: <br>  <br> Nancy Allen, Media Coordinator, 207-326-4576, <br>  <br> nallen@acadia.net <br>  <br> Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, <br>  <br> scottmclarty@yahoo.com <br><br>  <br>  <br> GREENS SAY NO TO BUSH'S MARRIAGE PROPOSAL <br><br>  <br>  <br> Welfare 'reform' will impose massive federal <br>  <br> control, enforce dependence, turn many women into <br>  <br> second-class citizens, and continue to deny <br>  <br> health coverage and child care <br><br>  <br>  <br> WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Greens blasted the plans by <br>  <br> President George W. Bush to earmark $300 million <br>  <br> of the $17 billion welfare budget for experiments <br>  <br> to promote marriage as a way to get women off <br>  <br> welfare and to force most welfare recipients to <br>  <br> work a 40-hour work week without child care and <br>  <br> benefits. <br><br>  <br>  <br> \"Too many Democrats crumble when they encounter <br>  <br> Republican rhetoric about family values,\" said <br>  <br> Rahul Mahajan, Green candidate for governor of <br>  <br> Texas.  \"Bush's plan doesn't promote healthy <br>  <br> families or moral values.  These are schemes to <br>  <br> make many women more helpless and dependent, to <br>  <br> push them into jobs and marriages without regard <br>  <br> for the women themselves or the care and health <br>  <br> of children.  They have everything to do with <br>  <br> posturing on the supposed moral shortcomings of <br>  <br> poor people, and nothing to do with alleviating <br>  <br> dependence and poverty.  The real measure of <br>  <br> success is the extent to which any plan reduces <br>  <br> poverty.\"  <br><br>  <br>  <br> \"So-called welfare reform often doesn't solve the <br>  <br> problem of getting people into good jobs, because <br>  <br> it neither creates real jobs with good wages nor <br>  <br> ensures good wages and good benefits in jobs that <br>  <br> already exist,\" said Robert Miranda, elected <br>  <br> Green member of the Social Development Commission <br>  <br> in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, which is responsible for <br>  <br> administering welfare in that state.  \"Instead, <br>  <br> welfare reform of the past decade, whether from <br>  <br> Clinton or Bush, has meant cheap labor and <br>  <br> enforced dependence.\" <br><br>  <br>  <br> Greens have called for living wages, full <br>  <br> benefits, collective bargaining rights, and <br>  <br> democratic workplaces for all people who work, <br>  <br> including those moving from relief to jobs.  <br>  <br> Greens support national health insurance for all <br>  <br> Americans; assistance for employment through <br>  <br> stable and responsible locally based business <br>  <br> instead of make-work and dead-end Walmart-wage <br>  <br> jobs; and recognition of caregiving as real work <br>  <br> that deserves compensation, not a luxury or an <br>  <br> excuse to avoid jobs.   <br><br>  <br>  <br> Many Greens want the reauthorization of Temporary <br>  <br> Aid to Needy Families (TANF) to increase <br>  <br> investments in child care, education and <br>  <br> training, and job creation rather than impose <br>  <br> stricter workfare requirements on states and <br>  <br> participants as proposed by Democrats and <br>  <br> Republicans in Congress.  Greens cite the <br>  <br> Carter-Bayh bill, supported by liberal Democrats <br>  <br> like Hillary Clinton (NY) and John Rockefeller <br>  <br> (WV), which includes such regressive agenda and <br>  <br> which would also divert TANF funding to <br>  <br> noncustodial parents and to groups that seek to <br>  <br> win custody rights over children for abusive <br>  <br> spouses. <br><br>  <br>  <br> \"Do all poor people have to return to slavery and <br>  <br> indentured servitude before Congress finds the <br>  <br> backbone to say no to Bush's insane welfare <br>  <br> proposal?,\" asked Donna Warren, Green candidate <br>  <br> for Lieutenant Governor of California.  \"Bush's <br>  <br> plan is counterproductive, disrupting, and drains <br>  <br> money from efforts to move poor people from <br>  <br> government dependency.  The Greens know this, 39 <br>  <br> states know this, and Bush knows this.  It is <br>  <br> amazing that Congress pretends not to know.\" <br><br>  <br>  <br> Green activists and candidates list specific <br>  <br> dangers in the Bush plan: <br><br>  <br>  <br> *** It doesn't provide what many mothers trying <br>  <br> to rejoin the work force need most: child care, <br>  <br> training and education where effective <br>  <br> (especially GED preparation and English as a <br>  <br> Second Language), and transportation.  \"At the <br>  <br> same time Bush would expand the workfare <br>  <br> requirement to 40 hours a week, there's no <br>  <br> acknowledgement that working mothers have special <br>  <br> needs,\" said Miranda.  \"It's devastating for many <br>  <br> women and some men who take care of children, <br>  <br> elderly, or disabled family members.\" <br><br>  <br>  <br> *** Bush's plan discriminates against mothers, <br>  <br> including lesbian mothers, who need help but may <br>  <br> find themselves barred from public housing and <br>  <br> other relief.  The plan creates a second-class <br>  <br> level of 'undeserving' lesbian mothers and single <br>  <br> heterosexual mothers who are unwilling or unable <br>  <br> to wed.  Proponents claim the plan will <br>  <br> strengthen marriage.  But by compelling marriage <br>  <br> solely for economic convenience, the plan <br>  <br> encourages unstable, temporary, and even <br>  <br> exploitative relationships.  \"Many women who <br>  <br> remain single or have separated from partners in <br>  <br> order to escape exploitation, abuse, or <br>  <br> dependence will now find themselves thrust back <br>  <br> into the kind of circumstances that forced them <br>  <br> to seek welfare in the first place,\" said Mark <br>  <br> Dunlea, Vice-Chair of Green Party of New York <br>  <br> State. <br><br>  <br>  <br> *** The plan's \"Super Waiver\" option allows <br>  <br> states to spend welfare relief and job training <br>  <br> funds on projects like the promotion of marriage. <br>  <br>  It also allows some faith-based organizations -- <br>  <br> groups that seek exemption from discrimination <br>  <br> statutes in hiring and training, providing <br>  <br> services, and licensing requirements -- to claim <br>  <br> larger shares of public funding. <br><br>  <br>  <br> \"I thought Republicans opposed 'social <br>  <br> engineering',\" observed Dr. Jonathan Farley, <br>  <br> Green Party congressional candidate from <br>  <br> Tennessee.  \"I don't want to be married by Big <br>  <br> Government.  I want to be married by a priest.\" <br><br>  <br><br> MORE INFORMATION <br><br>  <br>  <br> The Green Party of the United States <br>  <br> http:\/\/gpus.org  <br>  <br> http:\/\/www.greenpartyus.org <br>  <br> National office: 1314 18th Street, NW <br>  <br> Washington, DC 20036 <br>  <br> 202-296-7755, 866-41GREEN <br><br>  <br>  <br> Index of Green Party candidates in 2002  <br>  <br> http:\/\/www.greens.org\/elections <br><br>  <br><br> - END - <br><br> <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/gp-us.org","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Welfare 'reform' will impose massive federal\r\ncontrol, enforce dependence, turn many women into\r\nsecond-class citizens, and continue to deny\r\nhealth coverage and child care","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2002\/05\/greens_say.txt","filesize":"5.8 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2002\/05\/16654.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}