{"article":{"id":15583,"heading":"Night Cloud? Ground-Based Missile Test Over The Pacific","author":"AP","created":"2002-03-17 08:43:09","modified":"2002-03-17 09:00:03","last_modified":"Sun, 17 Mar 2002 16:00:03","article":"<p>Associated Press <br><br> 03\/16\/2002 12:02 AM EST <br><br>  By MATT KELLEY  <br><br>  An interceptor rocket smashed into a dummy warhead 140 miles over the Pacific on Friday <br>  <br>  night in the fourth successful test of its kind, a Pentagon spokeswoman said. <br><br>  The interceptor, launched from a tiny Pacific island near the equator, destroyed the dummy <br>  <br>  warhead at 9:41 p.m. EST, Pentagon spokeswoman Cheryl Irwin said. <br><br>  The test was the sixth of a prototype of a ground-based missile defense system. The <br>  <br>  interceptor successfully destroyed the dummy warhead in three of the previous five tests, <br>  <br>  including the most recent one in December. The military is also developing ship-based and <br>  <br>  other types of anti-missile systems. <br><br>  The military launched the target missile from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California at 9:11 <br>  <br>  p.m. EST, Irwin said. The interceptor took off 4,800 miles away from Meck Island in Kwajalein <br>  <br>  Atoll at 9:32 p.m. and collided with the dummy warhead in space nine minutes later, she said. <br><br>    Friday's test was the most complex of its kind so far, although it was still a developmental <br>  <br>  test, not an operational one. The dummy missile jettisoned three balloons to try to fool the <br>  <br>  interceptor. The most recent test included only one decoy balloon. <br><br>  The interceptor used its own sensors to pick out the warhead, track it and move in to collide <br>  <br>  with and destroy it, a Pentagon statement said. <br><br>  The Bush administration is pressing ahead with development of the anti-missile systems, <br>  <br>  saying the United States needs a defense if a rogue country like North Korea develops and <br>  <br>  fires long-range missiles at American shores. <br><br>  President Bush announced last year he was pulling the United States out of the 1972 <br>  <br>  Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty, which bans such missile defenses. Russia and some other <br>  <br>  countries have criticized the move. <br><br>  Domestic missile defense critics say the program is too costly and too easily defeated with <br>  <br>  simple countermeasures or by firing a larger number of missiles. <br><br>  Designing, testing and building a system of land- and sea-based missile defenses would cost <br>  <br>  between $23 billion and $64 billion by 2015, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office <br>  <br>  estimated earlier this year. <br><br>  Critics say long-range missiles are much less of a threat to the United States than terrorist <br>  <br>  attacks with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons built in or smuggled into the country. <br><br>  \"This is kind of a sideshow that doesn't have any basis in real threats,\" said Chris Madison of <br>  <br>  the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. <br><br>  Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told Congress last month that the Pentagon hoped <br>  <br>  to have four prototype anti-missile rockets stationed in Alaska in two years. <br><br>  That would happen before operational tests, which will use the most realistic scenarios. The <br>  <br>  Missile Defense Agency hopes to shift to tests over the North Pacific after 2004 for its more <br>  <br>  realistic tests, agency spokesman Lt. Col. Rick Lehner said. <br><br>  \"Our job is to develop the hardware necessary if we are directed to build\" a missile defense <br>  <br>  system, Lehner said. <br><br>  The full set of tests won't be finished until 2006 or 2007. The Pentagon hopes to test the <br>  <br>  ground-based system every three months until it's ready, Lehner said.<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Did you see that weird cloud lit up in the night sky over Southern California Friday evening? It wasn't a bird or a plane, it was Uncle Sam.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2002\/03\/15583.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}