{"article":{"id":15516,"heading":"More \"official\" lies about 911 falling apart","author":"start explaining Dubya!","created":"2002-03-14 04:36:45","modified":"2005-08-15 00:54:58","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:54:58","article":"

Questions to ask yourself when viewing these images:

- For the physics whizzes and structural engineers out there:

Why is the Pentagon so lightly damaged after being struck by 100 ton

(approx. 91,000 Kg) Boeing 757-200 flying at approximately 600 miles per

hour (270 m\/s), equaling a force of 35,200,000 kilojoules. This is simply

the energy that the walls of the Pentagon would have to absorb from the

plane alone. This does not take into account the combustive energy of the

jet fuel!!

- If you accept the official version of the events -- that it hit the lawn

of the Pentagon first -- why is the lawn perfectly unmarked??

Please click this link to view the pictures:

http:\/\/www.asile.org\/citoyens\/numero13\/pentagone\/erreurs_en.htm<\/a>

This is from a report on the potential for disaster if a commercial airliner were to strict a nuclear reactor. Apply this to the Pentagon, which might or might not have the same structural protection as a nuclear reactor:

\"It estimated that if just 1 percent of a jetliner's fuel ignited after impact, it would create an explosion equivalent to 1,000 pounds of dynamite inside a reactor building already damaged by the impact. The report suggested U.S. regulators had underestimated the potential damage from such an explosion.\"

http:\/\/pwp.surfglobal.net\/jscon\/nrc_knew_since_1982.htm<\/a>

I think that those defending the official version of events will have to

start answering some questions now, not those erroneously dismissed as

\"conspiracy theorists\"!!<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","summary":"Please read this and view the pictures. If these pictures are real, and I believe that they are since they are \"officially released\" pictures, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A BOEING 757 IMPACTED THE PENTAGON AND THEN EXPLODED!!","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2002\/03\/premiplggfe.jpg","filesize":"7.9 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2002\/03\/15516.php","image":{"original":"\/uploads\/2002\/03\/premiplggfe.jpg","small":"\/uploads\/2002\/03\/premiplggfe.jpgthumb.jpg"}},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":15537,"heading":"Physis checks out.","article":"Most of the energy was absorbed\r\nin the structure by use of new\r\nenergy absorbing constuction.\r\n60 min did a special on it.\r\nThe question you should ask:\r\nwhy of all the places to hit\r\ndid the plane hit smack middle\r\nto the section that had just been\r\nrenovated!\r\nThe rest of the Pentagon was\r\nvery volnerable.\r\nOnly that section, counter terrorism,\r\nwas hit, just after it had been \r\nupgraded to withstand such a hit.\r\nThe top brass are on the other side\r\nof the building, and that is a published fact.\r\nThe section that was hit\r\nwas still under construction,\r\nso very few people were there\r\nwhen the plane hit.\r\nJust befor Sept. 11 2001,\r\nthere was a change in personel\r\nso many of the top brass\r\nwere not even in the building\r\nthat day when the plane hit.\r\nAsh why a plane would\r\ndo so many difficult turns\r\nto hit a know hardend target\r\nwith very few people in it.\r\nThen you get some intersting \r\nanswers.","author":"Big Picture","parent_id":15516,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2002-03-15 01:27:04","modified":"2002-03-15 02:00:03","fileurl":""}]}