{"article":{"id":15515,"heading":"More \"official\" lies about 911 falling apart","author":"start explaining Dubya!","created":"2002-03-14 04:35:57","modified":"2015-12-18 10:15:28","last_modified":"Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:15:28","article":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><body><p>Questions to ask yourself when viewing these images:  <br><br> - For the physics whizzes and structural engineers out there:  <br><br> Why is the Pentagon so lightly damaged after being struck by 100 ton  <br>  <br> (approx. 91,000 Kg) Boeing 757-200 flying at approximately 600 miles per  <br>  <br> hour (270 m\/s), equaling a force of 35,200,000 kilojoules. This is simply  <br>  <br> the energy that the walls of the Pentagon would have to absorb from the  <br>  <br> plane alone. This does not take into account the combustive energy of the  <br>  <br> jet fuel!!  <br><br> - If you accept the official version of the events -- that it hit the lawn  <br>  <br> of the Pentagon first -- why is the lawn perfectly unmarked??  <br><br> Please click this link to view the pictures:  <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.asile.org\/citoyens\/numero13\/pentagone\/erreurs_en.htm\">http:\/\/www.asile.org\/citoyens\/numero13\/pentagone\/erreurs_en.htm<\/a>  <br><br> This is from a report on the potential for disaster if a commercial airliner were to strict a nuclear reactor. Apply this to the Pentagon, which might or might not have the same structural protection as a nuclear reactor:  <br><br> \"It estimated that if just 1 percent of a jetliner's fuel ignited after impact, it would create an explosion equivalent to 1,000 pounds of dynamite inside a reactor building already damaged by the impact. The report suggested U.S. regulators had underestimated the potential damage from such an explosion.\"  <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/pwp.surfglobal.net\/jscon\/nrc_knew_since_1982.htm\">http:\/\/pwp.surfglobal.net\/jscon\/nrc_knew_since_1982.htm<\/a>  <br><br> I think that those defending the official version of events will have to  <br>  <br> start answering some questions now, not those erroneously dismissed as  <br>  <br> \"conspiracy theorists\"!!<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Please read this and view the pictures. If these pictures are real, and I believe that they are since they are \"officially released\" pictures, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A BOEING 757 IMPACTED THE PENTAGON AND THEN EXPLODED!!","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2002\/03\/premiers-secours2.jpg","filesize":"7.9 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2002\/03\/15515.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}