{"article":{"id":15039,"heading":"FORMER ENRON CEO HUMILIATED, MADE TO ADMIT OWN ASSHOLERY, BY","author":"some dickshit","created":"2002-02-21 00:07:59","modified":"2005-08-15 00:53:55","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:53:55","article":"<p>WASHINGTON, Feb. 12 - Kenneth L. Lay, the former chairman of Enron, <br>  <br>                     asserted  <br>  <br>                     his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination today regarding his  <br>  <br>                     role in the largest corporate bankruptcy case in American history, but in  <br>  <br>                     the largely unreported \"closed session\" of his appearance before the Senate  <br>  <br>                     Commerce Committee, Lay was forced to admit his craven character in  <br>  <br>                     degrading and, most thought, appropriate fashion.  <br><br>                     After the first hour of opening statements in which Senators lambasted Lay,  <br>  <br>                     Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) surprised the assembly by producing a <br>  <br>                     dusky  <br>  <br>                     tome of Parliamentary rules \"last used in these hallowed halls\" according to  <br>  <br>                     McCain \"during the Pinkerington's Privy scandal of 1848.\" According to the  <br>  <br>                     rules, stipulated to by Mr. Lay's attorney, Philip Hilder, the \"ranking  <br>  <br>                     minority member of the investigating committee\" can abrogate the Fifth  <br>  <br>                     Amendment rights of a witness \"within specific and proscribed parameters if  <br>  <br>                     their crimes are of an odious nature, and their character of lowly ilk.\"  <br>  <br>                     The committee ruled unanimously that Mr. Lay's crimes and character met <br>  <br>                     the  <br>  <br>                     conditions established by Parliamentary procedure.  <br><br>                     The \"specific and proscribed parameters\" indicate that while the witness is  <br>  <br>                     not required to \"speak\" against himself, he is required to \"indicate  <br>  <br>                     acceptance of truthfulness, thereof\" by raising his right hand as required  <br>  <br>                     by questioning. Thereafter followed the most humorous and revealing <br>  <br>                     exchange  <br>  <br>                     of day.  <br><br>                     Senator McCain, ranking Republican on the Commerce Committee, began <br>  <br>                     playing  <br>  <br>                     a rather sophomoric game of \"Hands up!\" with Mr. Lay. The Questioning <br>  <br>                     went  <br>  <br>                     as follows:  <br><br>                     McCain: \"Hands up! Who's the asshole?\"  <br><br>                     Mr. Lay, after consultation with his lawyer, was obliged to indicate himself  <br>  <br>                     by a raising of his right hand. \"Hand up! Who's a self-serving prick?\" asked  <br>  <br>                     Senator McCain. \"Hands Up! Who's an avaricious, erudite corporate <br>  <br>                     schmuck?\"  <br><br>                     After each question, Mr. Lay consulted with his attorney, and then  <br>  <br>                     reluctantly raised his right hand. [See picture, here:  <br>  <br>                     http:\/\/story.news.yahoo.com\/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=\/020212\/161\/13k9e.html <br>  <br>                     ]  <br><br>                     Upon further questioning it was revealed, by hand-raising assent, that Mr.  <br>  <br>                     Lay was \"a feckless liar,\" a \"bastard who willingly made millions as his  <br>  <br>                     lesser employees ate dirt,\" and an \"incarnate argument for sterilization of  <br>  <br>                     the wealthy.\"  <br><br>                     A point of contention was raised when Senator McCain proffered the <br>  <br>                     challenge  <br>  <br>                     \"Hands Up! Who Sucks Satan's cock?\"  <br><br>                     Mr. Lay, looking haggard and somewhat bored, again cupped the <br>  <br>                     microphone and  <br>  <br>                     consulted with Mr. Hilder, who then asked for a ruling from the Committee  <br>  <br>                     Chair as to the definition of \"Satan's Cock.\" Chairman of the Commerce  <br>  <br>                     Committee, Ernest Hollings, appearing mildly titillated by the question,  <br>  <br>                     responded in his signature drawl, \"We all know the stain of Satan, and we  <br>  <br>                     all have been awoke by the crowing of the cock, but it might be best to  <br>  <br>                     leave these definitions to a higher court than the one here assembled.\"  <br><br>                     Laughter pervaded the hearing room, and even Mr. Lay was seen to crack a  <br>  <br>                     smile.  <br><br>                     Senator McCain's time then expired and soon thereafter questioning resumed <br><br>                     per standard rules. Mr. Lay returned to his Fifth Amendment defense.  <br><br>  <br>  <br>                     ____________________________  <br><br>                     The Hangdoggerel is published for promotional and self-aggrandizing <br>  <br>                     purposes <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":".com","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"  ok, this will b less than 6 lines.\r\n  duration is as long as the piece is red.","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2002\/02\/former_enr.txt","filesize":"4.5 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2002\/02\/15039.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":15040,"heading":"of course,","article":" it sux if kenny boy is the only one to fall for all those bastards money games.... hello Carlyle Investments!!\r\n","author":"unknowdn","parent_id":15039,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2002-02-21 00:12:16","modified":"2002-02-21 01:01:50","fileurl":""}]}