{"article":{"id":15001,"heading":"U.S. Companies File in Bermuda to Slash Tax Bills","author":"DAVID CAY JOHNSTON for New York Times","created":"2002-02-19 19:31:12","modified":"2005-08-15 00:53:52","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:53:52","article":"<br><br>                    U.S. Companies File in Bermuda to Slash Tax Bills <br><br>                    By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON <br><br>                          growing number of American companies, <br>  <br>                          encouraged by their financial advisers, <br>  <br>                          are incorporating in Bermuda to lower <br>  <br>                    their taxes sharply without giving up the benefits <br>  <br>                    of doing business in the United States. <br><br>                    Insurance companies led the way, but now <br>  <br>                    manufacturers and other kinds of companies are <br>  <br>                    following. <br><br>                    Stanley Works (news\/quote), for 159 years a <br>  <br>                    Connecticut maker of hammers and wrenches, <br>  <br>                    is among the latest with plans to become a <br>  <br>                    corporation in Bermuda, where there is no <br>  <br>                    income tax. The company estimates that it will <br>  <br>                    cut its tax bill by $30 million a year, to about $80 <br>  <br>                    million. <br><br>                    Tyco International (news\/quote), a diversified <br>  <br>                    manufacturer with headquarters in Exeter, N.H., <br>  <br>                    says that being a Bermuda corporation saved it <br>  <br>                    more than $400 million last year alone. Other <br>  <br>                    companies that have incorporated in Bermuda or <br>  <br>                    plan to do so include Global Crossing, a Beverly <br>  <br>                    Hills, Calif., telecommunications company; Ingersoll-Rand (news\/quote) and Foster <br>  <br>                    Wheeler (news\/quote), both New Jersey industrial manufacturers; Nabors Industries <br>  <br>                    (news\/quote), a Texas company that is the nation's largest oil well services <br>  <br>                    company; and Cooper Industries (news\/quote), a Houston manufacturer of industrial <br>  <br>                    equipment. <br><br>                    Becoming a Bermuda company is a paper transaction, as easy as securing a mail <br>  <br>                    drop there and paying some fees, while keeping the working headquarters back in <br>  <br>                    the United States. <br><br>                    Bermuda is charging Ingersoll- Rand just $27,653 a year for a move that allows the <br>  <br>                    company to avoid at least $40 million annually in American corporate income taxes. <br><br>                    The company is not required to conduct any meetings in Bermuda and will not even <br>  <br>                    have an office there, said its chief financial officer, David W. Devonshire. <br><br>                    \"We just pay a service organization\" to accept mail, he said. <br><br>                    Kate Barton, an Ernst &amp; Young tax partner, said that incorporating in Bermuda \"is a <br>  <br>                    megatrend we are seeing in the marketplace right now.\" Many corporations that are <br>  <br>                    planning the move have not yet announced it, she said. <br><br>                    In a Webcast to clients, Ms. Barton cited patriotism as the only potentially troubling <br>  <br>                    issue that corporations consider before moving to Bermuda, and she said that <br>  <br>                    profits trumped patriotism. <br><br>                    \"Is it the right time to be migrating a corporation's headquarters to an offshore <br>  <br>                    location?\" she asked. \"And yet, that said, we are working through a lot of companies <br>  <br>                    who feel that it is, that just the improvement on earnings is powerful enough that <br>  <br>                    maybe the patriotism issue needs to take a back seat to that.\"  <br><br>                    The White House has said nothing about these moves and their effect on tax <br>  <br>                    revenues. Mark A. Weinberger, chief of tax policy in the Treasury Department, said the <br>  <br>                    moves to Bermuda and other tax havens showed that the American tax system might <br>  <br>                    be driving companies to make such decisions. \"We may need to rethink some of our <br>  <br>                    international tax rules that were written 30 years ago when our economy was very <br>  <br>                    different and that now may be impeding the ability of U.S. companies to compete <br>  <br>                    internationally.\" <br><br>                    But others have expressed concern about the trend. Senator Charles E. Grassley of <br>  <br>                    Iowa, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, expressed alarm. <br>  <br>                    \"There is no business reason for doing this, other than to escape U.S. taxation. I <br>  <br>                    believe the Finance Committee needs to investigate this activity.\" <br><br>                    There is no official estimate of how much the Bermuda moves are costing the <br>  <br>                    government in tax revenues, and the Bush administration is not trying to come up <br>  <br>                    with one. <br><br>                    A Bermuda address is being recommended by many legal, accounting and <br>  <br>                    investment advisers. Stanley Works, for example, relied on Ernst &amp; Young for <br>  <br>                    accounting advice, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher &amp; Flom for legal advice, and <br>  <br>                    Goldman, Sachs for investment advice. <br><br>                    Ingersoll-Rand's top tax officer, Gerald Swimmer, said all of the major investment <br>  <br>                    houses and accounting firms had presented the idea to his company. <br>  <br>                    Ingersoll-Rand expects its worldwide income taxes to fall to less than $115 million <br>  <br>                    from about $155 million annually. <br><br>                    Many companies looking for tax havens abroad are choosing Bermuda because it is <br>  <br>                    close, its political system is stable and it uses a legal system similar to that of the <br>  <br>                    United States. But some, like Seagate Technology (news\/quote), the California <br>  <br>                    maker of computer disk drives, have gone to the Cayman Islands and other places. <br><br>                    Insurers have also flocked to Bermuda to escape most insurance regulations, <br>  <br>                    including how much money they must hold in reserve to pay claims. <br><br>                    Since companies that move to Bermuda usually keep their main offices in the United <br>  <br>                    States, they continue to have all the security provided by the American government, <br>  <br>                    the legal system and the courts.  <br><br>                    But by moving to Bermuda, their income from outside the United States becomes <br>  <br>                    exempt from American taxes. Also, when the American company borrows from its <br>  <br>                    Bermuda parent, the interest it pays creates a deduction that reduces U.S. taxes, but <br>  <br>                    there is no tax on the interest earned by the Bermuda parent. <br><br>                    These companies say they are moving because their worldwide tax rates are higher <br>  <br>                    than those of foreign competitors. Stanley Works expects its worldwide tax rate to fall <br>  <br>                    to 23 percent to 25 percent of profits, down from 32 percent now, said Gerard J. <br>  <br>                    Gould, Stanley's vice president for investor relations. \n","contact":"","link":"","address":"www.nytimes.com","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"in light of the whole enron thing...","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2002\/02\/u.s._h7m80v.txt","filesize":"7.0 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2002\/02\/15001.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}