{"article":{"id":14203,"heading":"Slashdot Users Defy Censorship","author":"OpenDNA","created":"2002-01-20 01:12:23","modified":"2002-01-20 01:49:12","last_modified":"Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:49:12","article":"<p>In what approximates a \"user revolt\" against editors at the <a href=\"&lt;a%20href=\" http: rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.slashdot.com<\/a>\"&gt;Slashdot.com online community, a  <br>  <br> <a href=\"&lt;a%20href=\" http: rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/slashdot.org\/comments.pl?sid=26315&amp;cid=2850660<\/a>\"&gt;discussion thread questioning <br>  <br> the moderation system has become one of the most popular in history despite the editorial  <br>  <br> \"bitchslap of the century\"  <br>  <br> [<a href=\"&lt;a%20href=\" http: rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/slashdot.org\/comments.pl?sid=26315&amp;cid=2860167<\/a>\"&gt;SlashDot]. A  <br>  <br> \"bitchslap\" gives a post a -1 rating (the lowest) making the post virtually invisible. In <br>  <br> this case an increasingly popular (if offtopic) and controversial thread was sent to \"-1 Hell\"  <br>  <br> only to become more popular: the apparent censorship reinforced the critics' possition. <br>  <br> SlashDot.com (or \"\/.\") has long been a bastion of Open Source software discussion, technology news  <br>  <br> and perenial anti-Microsoft propaganda. A conspiracy among moderators, or the site's administrators, <br>  <br> to squelch debate, if proven, would amount to the ultimate of corruption of the community [\/.  <br>  <br> currently hosts an online poll \"Favorite ammendment?\" in which the 1st has 44% or 8467 votes.]<\/p><p> <br><br> The phenomenon derives from the particular qualities of \/.'s moderation system, which is emulated <br>  <br> (with \/.'s software) across the net. The system allows moderators to cast votes on posts and  <br>  <br> comments using predefined categories. The users then recieve \"Karma Points\" - prestige - based on <br>  <br> the rating of their posts which gives advanced rating credibility to their future posts. Users may <br>  <br> browse threads and sections based upon the rating of the message (e.g. \"don't show me anything less <br>  <br> than a 3\"). A post which is rated -1 has essentially plummeted into the muck with \"Goat Boy's anus\" <br>  <br> and David Horowitz commentaries and is unlikely to be heard from again.<\/p><p> <br><br> As of 16:50 01\/18\/02 <a href=\"&lt;a%20href=\" http: rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/slashdot.org\/comments.pl?sid=26315&amp;cid=2850660<\/a>\"&gt;The first  <br>  <br> Slashdot troll post investigation is over 48 hours old, is ranked -1, and is still growing in <br>  <br> length and moderator votes. Indymedia.org visitors who imagine a 48-hour old hidden newswire  <br>  <br> article with 648(and counting) comments will get an impression of what this means to \/. <\/p><p> <br><br> Current moderator votes:<br> <br><br> Offtopic=164, <br> <br>  <br> Flamebait=4, <br> <br>  <br> Troll=10, <br> <br>  <br> Redundant=3, <br> <br>  <br> Insightful=31, <br> <br>  <br> Interesting=93, <br> <br>  <br> Informative=26, <br> <br>  <br> Funny=4, <br> <br>  <br> Overrated=7, <br> <br>  <br> Underrated=29, <br> <br>  <br> Total=371<br><\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/www.opendna.com","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/html","summary":"In what approximates a \"user revolt\" against editors at the Slashdot.com online community, a moderator-critical threat has become one of the most popular in history despite the editorial \"bitchslap of the century\".","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2002\/01\/14203.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}