{"article":{"id":14153,"heading":"Pictsweet found guilty of illegally firing mushroom worker who backed UFW","author":"Farm Worker Movement","created":"2002-01-18 05:09:08","modified":"2005-08-15 00:52:27","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:52:27","article":"<p>News from the Farm Worker Movement(www.ufw.org): <br><br> Pictsweet found guilty of illegally <br>  <br> firing mushroom worker who backed UFW <br><br>      An administrative judge with the state Agricultural Labor Relations <br>  <br> Board (ALRB) has ruled that Pictsweet Mushroom Farms illegally fired <br>  <br> mushroom picker Fidel Andrade in retaliation for his support of the <br>  <br> United Farm Workers and for engaging in other activities protected by <br>  <br> California's farm labor law. The judge ordered Andrade be offered his <br>  <br> job back and that he be reimbursed for all lost wages and other losses <br>  <br> \"suffered as a result of his unlawful discharge.\" <br><br>      After three days of testimony during hearings on Oct. 30, 31 and <br>  <br> Nov. 1, 2001, Administrative Law Judge Douglas Gallop concluded in a <br>  <br> 31-page written decision released on Jan. 10, 2002 that state <br>  <br> prosecutors \"established a prima facie case\" that the firing of Andrade <br>  <br> violated provisions of the act that make it an unfair labor practice for <br>  <br> an agricultural employer to \"interfere with, restrain or coerce\" workers <br>  <br> in the exercise of their rights under the law. <br><br>      Pictsweet claimed Andrade was fired for physically assaulting a <br>  <br> supervisor during an altercation at the Ventura mushroom plant. But the <br>  <br> judge concluded that the same supervisor \"had earlier shouted at Andrade <br>  <br> and pointed his finger at his [Andrade's] face,\" according to the <br>  <br> written judgment. \"That afternoon, [supervisor Augustine] Villanueva, <br>  <br> apparently still angry about the morning [finger-pointing] incident, <br>  <br> threw mushrooms into Andrade's basket at a time Andrade's face was <br>  <br> inches away. When Andrade protested this, Villanueva chose to escalate <br>  <br> the confrontation by returning to Andrade's work area, and by again <br>  <br> shouting at him and pointing his finger. <br><br>      \"In response, Andrade made one, brief physical contact, causing no <br>  <br> injury. Under these circumstances...it is concluded that Andrade's <br>  <br> response was in line with Villanueva's provocation and, therefore, <br>  <br> [Pictsweet] may not rely on it\" in defending its decision to fire <br>  <br> Andrade. <br><br>      Gallop, the ALRB judge, also cited \"the cursory treatment\" given by <br>  <br> Pictsweet to an anti-UFW worker who admitted referring to the \"killing\" <br>  <br> of union supporters, other management personnel's \"sarcastic reference\" <br>  <br> to union supporters as \"know it alls,\" the \"general tarring of union <br>  <br> supporters as treating the foremen like 'garbage' and the mocking <br>  <br> conduct\" of management in issuing Andrade an earlier warning letter. All <br>  <br> these and other events \"tend to show animus toward union sympathizers, <br>  <br> and a predisposition to blame them in disputed cases of misconduct.\" <br><br>      The judge also referred to a Pictsweet \"employee handbook <br>  <br> discouraging employees from seeking redress through the union and <br>  <br> encouraging direct dealing [with the grower], the latter arguably <br>  <br> constituting\" a law violation. And Gallop noted that Pictsweet \"again <br>  <br> arguably violated the act...by refusing to recognize union-designated <br>  <br> employee representatives.\" <br><br>      Gallop ordered that Pictsweet rescind the firing, offer Andrade his <br>  <br> job back with seniority, pay him all lost wages and other benefits, post <br>  <br> notices about workers' rights and arrange for an ALRB agent to read and <br>  <br> distribute the notice to employees on company time and answer their <br>  <br> questions outside the presence of Pictsweet officials. <br><br>       On Sept. 4, 2001, ALRB prosecutors issued a complaint against <br>  <br> Pictsweet over Andrade's firing. A separate detailed nine-count <br>  <br> complaint was issued against Pictsweet on June 26, 2001 by prosecutors <br>  <br> with the ALRB for a host of labor law violations, including bad faith <br>  <br> bargaining and illegally acting to get rid of the union. A hearing <br>  <br> before another judge on that complaint is set for Feb. 14 in Ventura. <br><br>      Negotiations have gone on since late 1999, with Pictsweet refusing <br>  <br> to respond to the workers' basic demands, the UFW states. The Cesar <br>  <br> Chavez-founded union has contracts protecting about 70% of the mushroom <br>  <br> workers on California's Central Coast. <br>  <br> - end - <br><br> For more information on the Farm Worker Movement visit our web site at http:\/\/www.ufw.org and\/or subscribe to the Farm Worker Movement list serve by sending an e-mail to UFW-subscribe@topica.com.  To unsubscribe send an e-mail to: UFW-unsubscribe@topica.com. <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"www.ufw.org","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Pictsweet found guilty of illegally\r\nfiring mushroom worker who backed UFW","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2002\/01\/pictsweet_.txt","filesize":"4.2 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2002\/01\/14153.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}