{"article":{"id":12338,"heading":"OMB Watch: Anti-Terrorism Bill Could Impact Nonprofits","author":"Matt Carter, OMB Watch","created":"2001-10-26 11:43:22","modified":"2001-10-26 12:00:01","last_modified":"Fri, 26 Oct 2001 19:00:01","article":"<p>[nonprof] Anti-Terrorism Bill Could Impact Nonprofits <br>  <br> Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:18:37 -0400 <br>  <br> From:  \"Matt Carter\" &lt;<a href=\"mailto:carterm@ombwatch.org\" rel=\"nofollow\">carterm@ombwatch.org<\/a>&gt; <br>  <br> To:      \"OMB Watch Nonprofit Issues\" &lt;<a href=\"mailto:nonprof@lyris.ombwatch.org\" rel=\"nofollow\">nonprof@lyris.ombwatch.org<\/a>&gt; <br><br> ANTI-TERRORISM BILL COULD  IMPACT NONPROFITS <br><br> ANTI-TERRORISM BILL COULD  IMPACT NONPROFITS <br><br> Congress is rushing through the \"USA PATRIOT Act\" (HR 3162) in  a closed process that has taken place during the shut down for  anthrax testing.  The House approved the bill yesterday, and the Senate is expected to vote today.  There will be no conference committee to reconcile differences, which were worked out behind  closed doors.  The final copy of the bill is not yet available to the public. <br><br> The version passed by the House yesterday could pose particular problems for nonprofits that advocate for changes in US foreign  policy or provide social services to individuals that become targets  of government investigations.  The central problem is a vague, overbroad defintion of  a new crime, \"domestic terrorism\".  (The attacks of September 11th are crimes under current law, making  this provision unnecessary.)  Acts of political protest could be covered, and anyone that provides material support or harbors a  person designated as a terrorist can be charged with a crime.   <br><br> The bill gives the government broad powers to investigate for intelligence purposes, without requiring probable cause that a crime is involved.  The Attorney General or Secretary of State could designate a group as a terrorist organization, making payment of dues by non-citizens a deportable offense and invoking authority to freeze financial accounts. There are no procedural safeguards to protect against a wrongful designation.  Even if a group is not designated as a terrorist organization, the government could  conduct secret searches of offices, wiretap phones, intercept  electronic messages and seize records, computers and other  items if it is investigating for \"intelligence\" purposes.  <br><br> The ACLU has issued a statement saying \"This broad new authority threatens to usher in a new age of investigation of  Americans based on their political activities.\"   <br><br> OMB Watch will post a detailed summary of the bill and its potential impact on nonprofits as soon as final information is  available. <br><br> --------------------------------------------------------- <br>  <br> Matt Carter, Public Affairs Liaison <br>  <br> OMB Watch <br>  <br> 1742 Connecticut Ave, Washington, DC 20007 <br>  <br> voice:(202) 234-8494  fax:(202) 234-5150<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The anti-terrorism bill passed by the House yesterday could threaten nonprofits that advocate for changes in US foreign policy or provide social services to individuals targeted by government investigations, primarily due tp a vague, overbroad defintion of  a new crime, \"domestic terrorism\".  Acts of political protest could be covered, and anyone that provides material support or harbors a  person designated as a terrorist can be charged with a crime.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2001\/10\/12338.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}