{"article":{"id":11891,"heading":"Censorship of news in wartime is still censorship","author":"Reporters Sans Frontieres","created":"2001-10-16 12:43:09","modified":"2001-10-16 13:00:01","last_modified":"Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:00:01","article":"<p>Monday October 15, 2001  <br><br> The threat of censorship is never greater than in wartime when <br>  <br> governments exploit the pull of patriotism to suppress <br>  <br> unwelcome news. <br><br> The notion that \"coded messages\" to terrorists in Osama Bin <br>  <br> Laden's videos could be beamed into America by Arabic TV is <br>  <br> the latest specter raised by the US administration as it tussles <br>  <br> for the high ground in the propaganda war. <br><br> One might think that experienced journalists and their <br>  <br> hard-nosed bosses would be too streetwise to fall for that. <br><br> But no. In a bizarre and unprecedented move, the five major <br>  <br> networks - CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS and Fox News Channel - have <br>  <br> rolled over and acquiesced to the call for censorship from the US <br>  <br> president's security adviser, Condoleezza Rice. <br><br> They agreed to stop airing broadcasts live and to suppress any <br>  <br> that included calls to violence against Americans by Osama Bin <br>  <br> Laden or his al-Qaida cohorts on Arab satellite channel <br>  <br> al-Jazeera. <br><br> \"We'll do whatever is our patriotic duty,\" said Australian-born <br>  <br> US citizen Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News and News <br>  <br> International. <br><br> In fact, a certain hacking at the foundations of the first <br>  <br> amendment - which guarantees freedom of expression and <br>  <br> opinion - was embarked on by the US administration while the <br>  <br> dust was still settling on the ruins of the World Trade Center. <br><br> And doubts soon surfaced about the capacity of the US media <br>  <br> to hold steady and defend its objectivity and independence as <br>  <br> the shock waves from the September 11 attacks still echoed. <br><br> In a report just released into the reaction of the US media to the <br>  <br> attacks, press freedom watchdog Reporters Sans Frontieres <br>  <br> (RSF) points out that several disquieting attempts at government <br>  <br> censorship have already been made, both inside and outside the <br>  <br> country and that self-censorship by the media was evident. <br><br> The clumsiest involved the US secretary of state Colin Powell's <br>  <br> urging of the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa el-Thani, <br>  <br> to bring al-Jazeera to heel and stop \"encouraging anti-American <br>  <br> feelings\".  <br><br> The Emir, the main shareholder in the Qatar-based station, <br>  <br> refused.  <br><br> Tony Blair has perhaps showed more savvy than Powell by <br>  <br> giving interviews on the channel. <br><br> The US state department, which has a seat on the board of the <br>  <br> Congress-financed Voice of America, tried to ban an interview on <br>  <br> VoA with the spiritual leader of the Taliban, Mullah Mohammed <br>  <br> Omar, scheduled for September 28. <br><br> The journalists protested - 150 of them signed a petition - and <br>  <br> they were backed in their struggle by the Washington Post. The <br>  <br> interview went ahead. <br><br> In incidents of corporate censorship two journalists have been <br>  <br> sacked from American newspapers so far, one in Texas and one <br>  <br> in Oregon, both for writing disparaging comments about George <br>  <br> Bush's behavior on September 11. <br><br> One said the president had \"skedaddled\" after the attacks and <br>  <br> another portrayed him as \"hiding in a hole in Nebraska\". <br><br> Not flattering words to use about a president who should have <br>  <br> been steadying his nation's nerves, but they constitute an <br>  <br> argument that can be defended in a democracy. <br><br> The truth is that any censorship of the news is unacceptable <br>  <br> and even more so now.  <br><br> It is arrogant and hugely misguided to imagine that the jitters of <br>  <br> a people, whose government has taken upon itself to go to war <br>  <br> against a nebulous enemy, can be calmed by seeking to protect <br>  <br> them from the truth, however terrifying that truth may be.<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/www.rsf.fr\/uk\/home.html","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The US administration began hacking at the foundations\r\nof the first amendment while the dust was still settling on\r\nthe ruins of the World Trade Center, writes Veronica\r\nForwood, chairwoman of the British branch of Reporters\r\nSans Frontieres","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2001\/10\/11891.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}