Apparently Afghans in Britain are not all so happy that the US and UK are bombing their homeland. The US press seems to promote the opposite view for our domestic Afghan nationals. Why the discrepency?
Afghans in Britain voice concern
London community doubts wisdom of attack
Jeevan Vasagar
Tuesday October 9, 2001
The Guardian
Leaders of the Afghan community in Britain yesterday
expressed anguish and outrage at the bombings.
"This is not a matter of being pro-Taliban or anti," said Sayed
Tabibi, secretary general of the Society for Afghan Residents,
based in Acton, west London. "There are over 1m people living in
Kabul. Every single family has got relatives back home.
"This is why we are outraged. It is nothing to do with the political
stance of one side or another. This is our country and it is being
bombed." Uprooted by a series of conflicts from the Soviet
invasion to the Taliban takeover, Britain's 40,000-strong Afghan
community is drawn from a diverse background, encompassing
Sunni and Shia Muslims as well as ethnic differences between
Pashtuns from the south and Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazara tribes
from the north.
Now their attention is focused on the humanitarian disaster.
They questioned if the strikes would have any military effect on
the Taliban.
"That regime does not have a proper command structure like
Iraq," said Mr Tabibi. "Men armed with one Kalashnikov each
can easily disperse among ordinary people. Afghans have not
been engaged in any terrorist activity - it is all Arabs. Why are
we getting the punishment?"
Professor Abdul Ahmed Javid, a former vice-chancellor of Kabul
university and one of many intellectuals to have fled the country,
emphasised the awkward position faced by opponents of the
Taliban.
"It is a very difficult situation. From one point of view, this is my
country and it has suffered for 20 years. But from the other point
of view, we should get rid of these terrorist organisations which
cause devastation; Osama bin Laden and the Taliban who
harbour him. It's the people of Afghanistan who are the victims."
The majority of Britain's Afghans are settled in a stretch of
suburban north-west London between Acton and Harrow, though
the Home Office asylum seeker dispersal scheme means there
are now also small communities in Birmingham, Glasgow and
Leeds.
At the Afghan Association of London, based in Harrow, a
spokesman appealed to the international community to protect
civilian lives.
"The Afghan people have endured enough suffering, destruction
and casualties in the past two and a half decades," he said.
The group also fears further racist assaults on Afghans in
Britain, following the attack in London which left an Afghan taxi
driver paralysed.
Police in Essex said yesterday that a fire lit by the door of a
mosque was being treated as a racially motivated crime.
Damage to the front door of the mosque in Southend-on-Sea
was discovered by worshippers attending morning prayers
yesterday.
It is the second attack on the building since the terrorist attacks
in the United States, but police said they were unable to confirm
if the incidents were linked to the events of September 11.
Paint was thrown on the walls and windows smashed during the
previous attack on the mosque last month.
Ghayasuddin Siddiqui, the leader of the Muslim parliament, said
the US should have given diplomatic efforts longer to take effect.
"The first casualty of this attack has been the rule of law," he
told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
"The Americans have lost their credibility. They had this
opportunity to somehow recover the moral high ground. The only
people who will be happy will be the American arms industry
and oil companies. It's a very, very sad day."
www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,565977,00.html
Original: 1st casualty = rule of law (Guardian)