- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by Henry Kissinger
Friday, Sep. 14, 2001 at 1:35 AM
An attack such as yesterday's requires systematic planning, a good organization, a lot of money and a base. You cannot improvise something like this, ...
Destroy The Network
By Henry Kissinger
Wednesday, September 12, 2001; Page A31
An attack such as yesterday's requires systematic planning, a good organization, a lot of money and a base. You cannot improvise something like this, and you cannot plan it when you're constantly on the move. Heretofore our response to attacks, and understandably so, has been to carry out some retaliatory act that was supposed to even the scales while hunting down the actual people who did it.
This, however, is an attack on the territorial United States, which is a threat to our social way of life and to our existence as a free society. It therefore has to be dealt with in a different way -- with an attack on the system that produces it.
The immediate response, of course, has to be taking care of casualties and restoring some sort of normal life. We must get back to work almost immediately, to show that our life cannot be disrupted. And we should henceforth show more sympathy for people who are daily exposed to this kind of attack, whom we keep telling to be very measured in their individual responses.
But then the government should be charged with a systematic response that, one hopes, will end the way that the attack on Pearl Harbor ended -- with the destruction of the system that is responsible for it. That system is a network of terrorist organizations sheltered in capitals of certain countries. In many cases we do not penalize those countries for sheltering the organizations; in other cases, we maintain something close to normal relations with them.
It is hard to say at this point what should be done in detail. If a week ago I had been asked whether such a coordinated attack as yesterday's was possible, I, no more than most people, would have thought so, so nothing I say is meant as a criticism. But until now we have been trying to do this as a police matter, and now it has to be done in a different way.
Of course there should be some act of retaliation, and I would certainly support it, but it cannot be the end of the process and should not even be the principal part of it. The principal part has to be to get the terrorist system on the run, and by the terrorist system I mean those parts of it that are organized on a global basis and can operate by synchronized means.
We do not yet know whether Osama bin Laden did this, although it appears to have the earmarks of a bin Laden-type operation. But any government that shelters groups capable of this kind of attack, whether or not they can be shown to have been involved in this attack, must pay an exorbitant price.
The question is not so much what kind of blow we can deliver this week or next. And the response, since our own security was threatened, cannot be made dependent on consensus, though this is an issue on which we and our allies must find a cooperative means of resistance that is not simply the lowest common denominator.
It is something we should do calmly, carefully and inexorably.
The writer is a former secretary of state.
© 2001 The Washington Post Company
Report this post as:
Friday, Sep. 14, 2001 at 7:45 AM
Mr. Kissenger, your hypocrisy is galling. Are you going to leap off the nearest bridge as the first step in sytematically cleansing the world of terrorism?
Report this post as:
Friday, Sep. 14, 2001 at 2:40 PM
no, it isn't necessary, & in fact has historically been proven to be counterproductive, to have a solid base, system, etc.
a fluid base, a system that relies on a few solid players who have one or a few pieces, not an entire set scenario, that mean nothing but what that piece(s) is until combined with other pieces of info & actions in any number of scenarios that don't require bringing anything other than knowledge, adaptability, commitment & patience housed within human beings.
exactly what the "digital" world & ideas of networks are based on; exactly how multi-celled organisms operate; even turning current western psychology on itself - the answers, the abilities are within each of us, not tied to the variable external "manmade" material manifestations of ideas.
Report this post as: