{"article":{"id":9494,"heading":"critique of border hack report","author":"coco fusco","created":"2001-08-28 02:04:17","modified":"2013-11-10 23:38:26","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:38:26","article":"<p>To: <a href=\"mailto:nettime-l@bbs.thing.net\" rel=\"nofollow\">nettime-l@bbs.thing.net<\/a>  <br>  <br>        Subject: <nettime> borderhack  <br>  <br>        From: <a href=\"mailto:TONGOLELE@aol.com\" rel=\"nofollow\">TONGOLELE@aol.com<\/a>  <br>  <br>        Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:19:38 EDT  <br>  <br>        Delivered-To: <a href=\"mailto:nettime-archive@nettime.khm.de\" rel=\"nofollow\">nettime-archive@nettime.khm.de<\/a>  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Dear Fran Ilich, <br><br>  I realize from the nettime-latino list that you are currently receiving <br>  <br> heated emails from critics about your borderhack event and don't want to <br>  <br> give the impression that I just want to add fuel to the fire. However, for <br>  <br> a long while now, each time I read your postings, I am left wondering why <br>  <br> you present your borderhack endeavors as if there had never been an <br>  <br> organized attempt before yours to develop a critical\/artistic approach to <br>  <br> the US-Mexico border. It may just be that you believe that using computers <br>  <br> makes everything different but the content of the work you present and the <br>  <br> content of your own essays read like re-runs of the manifestos of the <br>  <br> Border Arts Workshop in the 1980s. <br><br> They too wanted to bring the border down, explore the area as a zone of <br>  <br> intercultural exchange, point to human rights violations, and theorize a <br>  <br> border sensibility using the notion of the deterritorialized undocumented <br>  <br> Mexican as a trope. They brought the hybrid pop cultural forms of the <br>  <br> region into the spotlight, from norte&ntilde;o punk rock to Tijuanense detective <br>  <br> fiction, to Bart Simpson in sombreros and velvet paintings of Elvis. They <br>  <br> didn't work with computers so much, but they used radio, fax machines, <br>  <br> cheap printing processes, and connected with alternative information <br>  <br> distribution networks via the mail art circuit, an important precursor to <br>  <br> the current net.art arena. <br><br> They organized cultural events at the border, did performances across the <br>  <br> border fence, and in a metaphorical way, were \"hacking\" long before you <br>  <br> got there, and before any mainstream museum ever took interest in the <br>  <br> area.  Scores of academics in both the US and Mexico started thinking <br>  <br> about the border as the starting point of hybridity because of the work <br>  <br> that BAWTAF has done, and because of the contributions of such writers and <br>  <br> artists as Guillermo Gomez-Pe&ntilde;a, Gloria Anzaldua, Alurista and so on. In <br>  <br> addition, from the 1960s onward, Chicano artists were talking about a <br>  <br> territory without borders and making art about the region, laying a <br>  <br> groundwork for the sensibility you now claim as your own. <br><br> It is dismissive and even ignorant to describe all these efforts as <br>  <br> \"cliched\" approaches to the border - I honestly don't see that what you <br>  <br> propose as very different other than that you propose to transpose this <br>  <br> work into a virtual context. The other real difference I see is that you <br>  <br> want to draw a predominantly European and Euro-American net.art crowd from <br>  <br> nettime to TJ and link the US-Mexico border scene to the European art <br>  <br> scene -- now what would that do for the border and the people who live and <br>  <br> work there? <br><br> Still, it is historically inaccurate to suggest that artists first got <br>  <br> concerned about borders in Europe first during the last Documenta as you <br>  <br> have written -- artists have been working on the US-Mexico border for much <br>  <br> much longer than that. What does seem terribly odd is that it would appear <br>  <br> that you must erase the history of border culture in order to cast your <br>  <br> own venture as the starting point. Now why would that be necessary?  Why <br>  <br> make net.art partake of that violent modernist tradition of having to <br>  <br> demolish everything in order to make one's own creativity seem original? <br>  <br> Why not bring all your peers and colleagues from a variety of disciplines <br>  <br> and histories into dialogue together to share border culture? Why turn <br>  <br> your back on the past and even on other artists working in the present <br>  <br> (BAW TAF still exists, for example) and only pay attention to one digerati <br>  <br> clique that too often mistakes itself for the only politicized avant garde <br>  <br> to have ever emerged in the history of the world?  <br><br> Sincerely, Coco Fusco <br><br> (forwarded by DeeDee)<\/nettime><\/p>\n","contact":"TONGOLELE@aol.com","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Performance Artist Coco Fusco takes on border hacker boasts","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2001\/08\/9494.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}