{"article":{"id":8653,"heading":"Naomi Klein describes the appeal of the Zapatistas and their 'voice' Marcos","author":"Naomi Klein","created":"2001-07-15 00:59:44","modified":"2005-08-15 00:36:27","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:36:27","article":"<p>The unknown icon  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Naomi Klein  <br><br>  <br>  <br> I've never been to Chiapas. I've never made the pilgrimage to the Lacandon jungle. I've never sat in the mud and the mist in La Realidad. I've never begged, pleaded or posed to get an audience with Subcomandante Marcos, the masked man, the faceless face of Mexico's Zapatista National Liberation Army. I know people who have. Lots of them. In 1994, the summer after the Zapatista rebellion, caravans to Chiapas were all the rage in north American activist circles: friends got together and raised money for secondhand vans, filled them with supplies, then drove south to San Cristobal de las Casas and left the vans behind. I didn't pay much attention at the time. Back then, Zapatista-mania looked suspiciously like just another cause for guilty lefties with a Latin American fetish: another Marxist rebel army, another macho leader, another chance to go south and buy colourful textiles. Hadn't we heard this story before? Hadn't it ended badly? Last week, there was another caravan in Chiapas. But this was different. First, it didn't end in San Cristobal de las Casas; it started there, and is now criss-crossing the Mexican countryside before the planned grand entrance into Mexico City on March 11. The caravan, nicknamed the \"Zapatour\" by the Mexican press, is being led by the council of 24 Zapatista commanders, in full uniform and masks (though no weapons), including Subcomandante Marcos himself. Because it is unheard of for the Zapatista command to travel outside Chiapas (and there are vigilantes threatening deadly duels with Marcos all along the way), the Zapatour needs tight security. The Red Cross turned down the job, so protection is being provided by several hundred anarchists from Italy who call themselves Ya Basta! (meaning \"Enough is enough!\"), after the defiant phrase used in the Zapatistas' declaration of war. Hundreds of students, small farmers and activists have joined the roadshow, and thousands greet them along the way. Unlike those early visitors to Chiapas, these travellers say they are there not because they are \"in solidarity\" with the Zapatistas, but because they are Zapatistas. Some even claim to be Subcomandante Marcos himself - they say we are all Marcos. <br><br> Perhaps only a man who never takes off his mask, who hides his real name, could lead this caravan of renegades, rebels, loners and anarchists on this two-week trek. These are people who have learned to steer clear of charismatic leaders with one-size-fits-all ideologies. These aren't party loyalists; these are members of groups that pride themselves on their autonomy and lack of hierarchy. Marcos - with his black wool mask, two eyes and pipe - seems to be an anti-leader tailor-made for this suspicious, critical lot. Not only does he refuse to show his face, undercutting (and simultaneously augmenting) his own celebrity, but Marcos's story is of a man who came to his leadership, not through swaggering certainty, but by coming to terms with political uncertainty, by learning to follow. <br><br> Though there is no confirmation of Marcos's real identity, the most repeated legend that surrounds him goes like this: an urban Marxist intellectual and activist, Marcos was wanted by the state and was no longer safe in the cities. He fled to the mountains of Chiapas in southeast Mexico filled with revolutionary rhetoric and certainty, there to convert the poor indigenous masses to the cause of armed proletarian revolution against the bourgeoisie. He said the workers of the world must unite, and the Mayans just stared at him. They said they weren't workers and, besides, land wasn't property but the heart of their community. Having failed as a Marxist missionary, Marcos immersed himself in Mayan culture. The more he learned, the less he knew. Out of this process, a new kind of army emerged, the EZLN, the Zapatista National Liberation Army, which was not controlled by an elite of guerrilla commanders but by the communities themselves, through clandestine councils and open assemblies. \"Our army,\" says Marcos, \"became scandalously Indian.\" That meant that he wasn't a commander barking orders, but a subcomandante, a conduit for the will of the councils. His first words said in the new persona were: \"Through me speaks the will of the Zapatista National Liberation Army.\" Further subjugating himself, Marcos says that he is not a leader to those who seek him out, but that his black mask is a mirror, reflecting each of their own struggles; that a Zapatista is anyone anywhere fighting injustice, that \"We are you\". He once said, \"Marcos is gay in San Francisco, black in South Africa, an Asian in Europe, a Chicano in San Ysidro, an anarchist in Spain, a Palestinian in Israel, a Mayan Indian in the streets of San Cristobal, a Jew in Germany, a Gypsy in Poland, a Mohawk in Quebec, a pacifist in Bosnia, a single woman on the Metro at 10pm, a peasant without land, a gang member in the slums, an unemployed worker, an unhappy student and, of course, a Zapatista in the mountains.\" <br><br> \"This non-self,\" writes Juana Ponce de Leon who has collected and edited Marcos's writings in Our Word Is Our Weapon (see extracts on pages 14-16), \"makes it possible for Marcos to become the spokesperson for indigenous communities. He is transparent, and he is iconographic.\" Yet the paradox of Marcos and the Zapatistas is that, despite the masks, the non-selves, the mystery, their struggle is about the opposite of anonymity - it is about the right to be seen. When the Zapatistas took up arms and said Ya Basta! in 1994, it was a revolt against their invisibility. Like so many others left behind by globalisation, the Mayans of Chiapas had fallen off the economic map: \"Below in the cities,\" the EZLN command stated, \"we did not exist. Our lives were worth less than those of machines or animals. We were like stones, like weeds in the road. We were silenced. We were faceless.\" By arming and masking themselves, the Zapatistas explain, they weren't joining some Star Trek-like Borg universe of people without identities fighting in common cause: they were forcing the world to stop ignoring their plight, to see their long neglected faces. The Zapatistas are \"the voice that arms itself to be heard. The face that hides itself to be seen.\" <br><br> Meanwhile, Marcos himself - the supposed non-self, the conduit, the mirror - writes in a tone so personal and poetic, so completely and unmistakably his own, that he is constantly undercutting and subverting the anonymity that comes from his mask and pseudonym. It is often said that the Zapatistas' best weapon was the internet, but their true secret weapon was their language. In Our Word Is Our Weapon, we read manifestos and war cries that are also poems, legends and riffs. A character emerges behind the mask, a personality. Marcos is a revolutionary who writes long meditative letters to Uruguayan poet Eduardo Galeano about the meaning of silence; who describes colonialism as a series of \"bad jokes badly told\", who quotes Lewis Carroll, Shakespeare and Borges. Who writes that resistance takes place \"any time any man or woman rebels to the point of tearing off the clothes resignation has woven for them and cynicism has dyed grey\". And who then sends whimsical mock telegrams to all of \"civil society\": \"THE GRAYS HOPE TO WIN. STOP. RAINBOW NEEDED URGENTLY.\" <br><br> Marcos seems keenly aware of himself as an irresistible romantic hero. He's an Isabelle Allende character in reverse - not the poor peasant who becomes a Marxist rebel, but a Marxist intellectual who becomes a poor peasant. He plays with this character, flirts with it, saying that he can't reveal his real identity for fear of disappointing his female fans. Perhaps wary that this game was getting a little out of hand, Marcos chose the eve of Valentine's Day this year to break the bad news: he is married, and deeply in love, and her name is La Mar (\"the Sea\" - what else would it be?) <br><br> This is a movement keenly aware of the power of words and symbols. Rumour has it that when the 24-strong Zapatista command arrive in Mexico City, they hope to ride downtown on horseback, like indigenous conquistadors. There will be a massive rally, and concerts, and they will ask to address the Congress. There, they will demand that legislators pass an Indigenous Bill of Rights, a law that came out of the Zapatistas' failed peace negotiations with president, Ernesto Zedillo, who was defeated in recent elections. Vincente Fox, his successor who famously bragged during the campaign that he could solve the Zapatista problem \"in 15 minutes\", has asked for a meeting with Marcos, but has so far been refused - not until the bill is passed, says Marcos, not until more army troops are withdrawn from Zapatista territory, not until all Zapatista political prisoners are freed. Marcos has been betrayed before, and accuses Fox of staging a \"simulation of peace\" before the peace negotiations have even restarted. What is clear in all this jostling for position is that something radical has changed in the balance of power in Mexico. The Zapatistas are calling the shots now - which is significant, because they have lost the habit of firing shots. What started as a small, armed insurrection has in the past seven years turned into what now looks more like a peaceful, and mass movement. It has helped topple the corrupt 71-year reign of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, and has placed indigenous rights at the centre of the Mexican political agenda. <br><br> Which is why Marcos gets angry when he is looked on as just another guy with a gun: \"What other guerrilla force has convened a national democratic movement, civic and peaceful, so that armed struggle becomes useless?\" he asks. \"What other guerrilla force asks its bases of support about what it should do before doing it? What other guerrilla force has struggled to achieve a democratic space and not take power? What other guerrilla force has relied more on words than on bullets?\" <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/www.nologo.org","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Though there is no confirmation of Marcos's real identity, the most repeated legend that surrounds him goes like this: an urban Marxist intellectual and activist, Marcos was wanted by the state and was no longer safe in the cities. He fled to the mountains of Chiapas in southeast Mexico filled with revolutionary rhetoric and certainty, there to convert the poor indigenous masses to the cause of armed proletarian revolution against the bourgeoisie.","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2001\/07\/naomidjwlpn.txt","filesize":"23.2 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2001\/07\/8653.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":8666,"heading":"Zapatistas Not for Armed Revolution in Mexico","article":"  Ms. Naomi Klein, \r\n\r\n\r\n Your article, works and ideas are very important. I was  \r\n unable to hera you speak at Emory University. I understand\r\n that about 3 organizations sponsored your discussion \r\n about  your work and activism.Please take 8-10 minutes to \r\n read this letter.\r\n\r\n\r\n I wrote you this hoping that it will make clear some of \r\n the differences between ideas in our Hemisphere, keep  \r\n people on a non-violent wavelength and add to our \r\n successes even though these are hard to document and share \r\n due to our work schedules, poverty and hardships.Often, I  \r\n am cognizant of the work of Hosea Williams: the man who \r\n most closely continued the owork of Martin Luther King in \r\n urban areas. The Federation of Southern Cooperatives does  \r\n this in rural areas in 12 states.\r\n\r\n Zapatistas are not for armed communist revolution. Many \r\n people are misled into thinking that armed groups is the \r\n only form of radicalism. What about Bolivia with it's road \r\n blocks and marches? What about the Progressive anarchy \r\n practiced in Spain? Those groups  did not use warfare. \r\n Confrontation is not always war. Mexico is similar most of \r\n the people involved in Chiapas do not support the \r\n teachings of armed communist groups.\r\n\r\n The ERPI is a very small violent group in parts of \r\n Guerrero that \r\n uses explosives and firearms.They agreed to stop what  \r\n they  were doing when the Zapatista Caravan came through   \r\n other states.\r\n \r\n Indigenism uses mass- \r\n mobilizations\/community work\/education. ERPI has a very \r\n different strategy and a lot of it is related to making \r\n violence so the government, landowners, church and others \r\n will be killed off or scared to such a degree that they \r\n will be on their knees. ERPI bombed a \r\n shopping  \r\n mall in Guerrero in the early 1970's and kidnapped the  \r\n Governor of  \r\n Guerrero.Their leader is Cabanas. Some people are trying  \r\n to    \r\n push indigenism towards Che, Cabanas others.\r\n\r\n   People have lost many lives,suffered and tried to \r\n develop alternative social, economic and political \r\n possibilities under 1 party rule and communism  \r\n calls for a dictatorship in its publications.\r\n \r\n In capitalist or socialist contries: at least people are  \r\n often re-imbursed for violence against them. Abner Louima, \r\n radiation victims (sometimes), Japanese internment, and  \r\n other categories very numerous. This is not a defense of  \r\n militarization, multinationals or severely bureaucratic  \r\n rules. Watch 60 Minutes when you can, read Mother Jones,\r\n and keep a radio handy so that Democracy Now is available.\r\n\r\n Communist gulag victims, whether they be of Stalin, \r\n Lenin,  Great Leap, Cultural Revolution are not even \r\n ALLOWED TO THINK ABOUT HAVING A LAWYER.\r\n \r\n\r\n See La Reforma Newspaper from Mexico City D.F.\r\n\r\n PS I wanted to go hear Romani (Gypsy) music tonight over  \r\n in Midtown Atlanta. Would you writea short letter so that \r\n I know you received this?\r\n\r\n With respect for your hard work,\r\n\r\n Paul Hays","author":"Paul Hays","parent_id":8653,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2001-07-15 21:58:58","modified":"2001-07-15 23:00:02","fileurl":""}]}