{"article":{"id":6908,"heading":"GREEN PARTY USA CALIFORNIA GREEN ASSEMBLY DEBATES BOSTON PROPOSAL","author":"WALT SHEASBY","created":"2001-05-22 00:58:00","modified":"2005-08-15 00:34:17","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:34:17","article":"<p>GPUSA CALIFORNIA GREEN ASSEMBLY DEBATES BOSTON PROPOSAL <br><br>  <br>  <br> The GPUSA Green Assembly met Saturday, May 19, in Pasadena <br>  <br> and debated the pros and cons of  the Boston Proposal, an agreement <br>  <br> to create a single electoral Green Party in the United States. The keynote <br>  <br> speaker was Blase Bonpane, former Green Congressional candidate <br>  <br> with the Office of the Americas and the Peace Center Coalition. <br>  <br> Bonpane, a former Maryknoll missionary expelled from Guatemala <br>  <br> for defending the human rights of the indigenous people, called on <br>  <br> Green candidates to use local campaigns to address global issues. <br>  <br> For instance, he said, a school board candidate could demand an end <br>  <br> to ROTC recruiting on high school campuses, calling for genuine <br>  <br> youth opportunities and dissociating the community from foreign <br>  <br> interventions. <br><br>  <br>  <br> Bonpane said that disagreements on the Left that were supposed <br>  <br> to be points of principle usually involved conflicts over status <br>  <br> and turf, and he called on Greens and those who want real <br>  <br> social change to work for unity. <br><br>  <br>  <br> In debating the Boston Proposal, Casey Peters presented the opposition <br>  <br> viewpoint, arguing that a negotiated unification of the Association of <br>  <br> State Green Parties and the Green Parties USA could only be done <br>  <br> after agreement was reached on a common platform, uniform bylaws, <br>  <br> and equal power-sharing.  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Walt Sheasby, who had organized the Green Assembly,  argued in favor  <br>  <br> of the Boston Proposal, pointing out that the existence of two parties  <br>  <br> claiming to be the real Green Party was untenable, that the State Parties  <br>  <br> intended to form a Green Party U.S. that would ask for recognition by  <br>  <br> the Federal Elections Commission, backed up by affidavits of its 2000  <br>  <br> Presidential candidate and former Congressional candidates, and that  <br>  <br> GPUSA had no basis for opposing that filing with the F.E.C..  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Sheasby said many Greens support the formation of a new Green <br>  <br> Movement that would work within State Parties as well as independently,  <br>  <br> maintaining and expanding the affiliation of former GPUSA locals. <br><br>  <br>  <br> Peters responded that there was no need to have a single electoral <br>  <br> Party representing the Greens, and cited the existence of a multitude <br>  <br> of socialist parties running Presidential candidates, including the  <br>  <br> Peace and Freedom Party, the Communist Party USA, the Socialist  <br>  <br> Party USA, the Socialist Workers Party, the Workers World Party,  <br>  <br> the Socialist Labor Party, and several others. <br><br>  <br>  <br> Sheasby said that the public could easily accept the idea that a Green <br>  <br> Party wiould have both a right wing and a left wing, as with the <br>  <br> two major parties, but they could not understand two parties with <br>  <br> the same name competing for the title of real Green Party. <br><br>  <br>  <br> Ed Shacklett called for a fourth option on the printed ballot given <br>  <br> out at the meeting, and eventually his call for a fourth box for <br>  <br> &lsquo;Renegotiate&rsquo; as well as Accept, Reject or Abstain was accepted. <br>  <br> The completed ballots will be presented at the July 22 Carbondale <br>  <br> Green National Copngress along with other written ballots from <br>  <br> California GPUSA members. <br><br>  <br>  <br> The Green Assembly will meet again on September 22 in Idylwild <br>  <br> in Riverside County, California. The 24 members and guests present  <br>  <br> and their GPUSA local affiliations were:  <br>  <br> Appel, Doug; Venice Greens <br>  <br> Bonbane, Blase; Los Angeles Greens <br>  <br> Bonpane, Theresa; Los Angeles Greens <br>  <br> Cole, Ralph; Los Angeles Greens <br>  <br> Egan, Marc; Perth, Australia <br>  <br> Emmons, Cynthia, San Gabriel Valley Greens <br>  <br> Evans, Ed; Orange County Greens <br>  <br> Evans, Jay Orange County Greens <br>  <br> Hall, Joseph; San Gabriel Valley Greens <br>  <br> Hoffman, Renee, San Gabriel Valley Greens <br>  <br> Holmstrum, Britt; unaffiliated at present <br>  <br> Navarro, Tony, San Gabriel Valley Greens <br>  <br> Nelson, Susan B.; Los Angeles Greens <br>  <br> Pedroza, Donna; Los Angeles Greens <br>  <br> Peters, Casey; Peace and Freedom Party <br>  <br> Reutter, Chuck; Southwest Local, Riverside County <br>  <br> Riehle, Victor, unaffiliated at present <br>  <br> Shacklett, Edward; Ventura Greens <br>  <br> Sheasby, Walt Contreras; San Gabriel Valley Greens <br>  <br> Skye, Coby; Los Angeles Greens <br>  <br> Spillman, Julianne; San Gabriel Valley Greens <br>  <br> Tucker, Jan; unaffiliated at present <br>  <br> Weeks, Gabrielle; Los Angeles Greens <br>  <br> White, Gordon; Riverside Local, Riverside County <br><br> <\/p>\n","contact":"WSHEASBY@CS.COM","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The GPUSA Green Assembly met Saturday, May 19, in Pasadena\r\nand debated the pros and cons of  the Boston Proposal, an agreement\r\nto create a single electoral Green Party in the United States.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2001\/05\/green_part.txt","filesize":"4.1 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2001\/05\/6908.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}