{"article":{"id":5766,"heading":"NET CENSORSHIP!","author":"W.W.W.","created":"2001-03-29 11:56:00","modified":"2001-03-31 16:22:17","last_modified":"Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:22:17","article":"

www update on kangaroo court proceedings

THE COURT, being advised by the Government of the defendant's

stated intention of publishing discovery materials in this case

on the Internet, which discovery materials include voluminous

private information and personal addresses of various

individuals, HEREBY ORDERS that no materials disclosed by the

government as part of its discovery obligation shall be shared

by defense counsel with the defendant until further notice of

the court.



DATED this 11th day of January, 2001.

This relates to april 2 tacoma trial of james dalton bell.The synthesyser of \"assasination politics\"Respected Wired journalist declan mc culogh is subpoened to testify.<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"GOVT.GAG.They lost the clipper and PGP\r\nDONT THEY WANT THE NET TO BE FREE?","numcomment":4,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2001\/03\/5766.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":5767,"heading":"Further","article":"Comes now the Defendant, James Dalton Bell, who declares that\r\n he is effectively and unwillingly unrepresented, and that\r\n his 6th Amendment Right to Counsel has been repeatedly and\r\n intentionally violated since on or about December 1, 2000.\r\n Defendant Bell has repeatedly sent letters to the court asking\r\n for substitute counsel, and two separate motions by attorney\r\n Robert Leen have been essentially ignored since mid-\r\n December, 2000.\r\n \r\n","author":"www","parent_id":5766,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2001-03-29 12:00:48","modified":"2001-03-29 12:17:30","fileurl":""},{"id":5782,"heading":"More ...","article":"This tail of text at CRYPTOME (I google)\r\n15. Defendant Bell would like to remind those who read\r\n\tthis motion that he has written every single word of it,\r\n\tand believes that it will go far to show that, despite his\r\n\tvery arguable lack of tact, that he is quite capable of\r\n\tassisting in his defense and is even more capable of\r\n\tidentifying sham proceedings.\r\n\r\n\t\t16. Whereupon Defendant Bell motions the court for\r\n\tthe following sanctions to be imposed on the corresponding\r\n\tofficers of the court:\r\n\r\n\tAttorney Leen: $5,000 per day subsequent to December 1, 2000,\r\n\tand continuing until his removal by appropriate authority;\r\n\tpayable to Defendant Bell.\r\n\r\n\tProsecutor Rob London: $10,000 per day subsequent to\r\n\tapproximately December 1, 2000, and continuing until his\r\n\tremoval by appropriate authority; payable to Defendant Bell.\r\n\r\n\tThe Court, Judge Tanner: $5,000 per day subsequent to December\r\n\t11,) 2000, and continuing until his recusal; payable to\r\n\tDefendant Bell.\r\n\r\n\t\t17. Defendant Bell motions the Court for immediate\r\n\tremoval of attorney Leen and prosecutor London by appropriate\r\n\tproceedings.\r\n\r\n\t\t18. Defendant Bell motions the Court, Judge Jack\r\n\tTanner, for his immediate recusal from this case.\r\n\r\n\tSigned [Signature] 02\/06\/2001\r\n","author":"www","parent_id":5766,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2001-03-30 23:22:23","modified":"2001-03-31 00:00:01","fileurl":""},{"id":5788,"heading":"Further","article":"14. On January 31, 2001, attorney Leen came for a so-\r\n\tfar \"final\" visit to Defendant Bell, where Leen made a\r\n\tstartling revelation:\tHe said that he has been threatened\r\n\tby \"many\" government people. Defendant asked him if he'd\r\n\treported these threats to any authorities and said \"no.\" Def't\r\n\ttold him to report them, but he refused. Had Defendant not\r\n\t\"fired\" Leen in early December, he would certainly have had\r\n\tno-choice but to do so at this moment.\r\n\r\n\t\t15. Defendant Bell believes that his Constitutional\r\n\tRights have been repeatedly and intentionally violated by\r\n\tthe both the individual and coordinated actions of attorney\r\n\tLeen, apparently acting on behalf of and with prosecutor\r\n\tRob London, as well as with the knowledge and assistance of\r\n\tthe Court, Judge Tanner. The lock-step coordination of each\r\n\tof these actors, particularly in the denial of effective\r\n\trepresentation; the denial of discovery materials; the\r\n\tblatant attempt at forcing Defendant Bell to sign the\r\n\tSpeedy Trial waiver; the emergency examination that the\r\n\tfailure of this extortion made necessary; and the failure of\r\n\tthe Court to rule on essential motions such as Change of\r\n\tVenue and Representation; All of these make it impossible\r\n\tto separate the responsibility and distinguish the misbehavior\r\n\tof these players.\r\n\r\n\t\t15. Defendant Bell would like to remind those who read\r\n\tthis motion that he has written every single word of it,\r\n\tand believes that it will go far to show that, despite his\r\n\tvery arguable lack of tact, that he is quite capable of\r\n\tassisting in his defense and is even more capable of\r\n\tidentifying sham proceedings.\r\n\r\n","author":"WWW","parent_id":5766,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2001-03-31 16:14:44","modified":"2001-03-31 18:01:02","fileurl":""},{"id":5789,"heading":"Declan fights subpoena","article":"By this motion, non-party witness Declan McCullagh (\"McCullagh\"), a reporter for Wired News, an online news magazine published by Lycos, Inc., seeks to quash the trial subpoena served on him by the Office of the United States Attorney. That subpoena requires him to testify for the government at the trial of James Dalton Bell and produce copies of two articles written by McCullagh and published by Wired News (\"the Articles\"):\r\n\r\n\"Crypto-Convict Won\u2019t Recant,\" published April 14, 2000; and \r\n\"IRS Raids Cypherpunk\u2019s House,\" published November ","author":"WWW","parent_id":5766,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2001-03-31 16:22:17","modified":"2013-11-10 23:37:14","fileurl":""}]}