{"article":{"id":5412,"heading":"COUPWATCH: The Court Packs Itself","author":"Bruce Ackerman \/ The American Prospect","created":"2001-02-05 22:07:18","modified":"2001-02-05 23:00:01","last_modified":"Tue, 06 Feb 2001 06:00:01","article":"

COUPWATCH: The Court Packs Itself

Bruce Ackerman

\"This is not the first time in history that the Supreme Court has made a decision that called its fundamental legitimacy into question. But on past occasions, the normal operation of the system provided a remedy. As the wheel of mortality turned and justices were replaced, the Court regained credibility as an independently elected president and Senate appointed new members. But this time, the president has not been independently elected. He is in the White House as a result of an unprincipled judicial decision that brought the electoral contest to a premature end. If such a president is allowed to fill the Court, he will be acting as an agent of the narrow right-wing majority that secured his victory in the first place.

\"In our democracy, there is one basic check on a runaway Court: presidential elections. And a majority of the justices have conspired to eliminate this check. The Supreme Court cannot be permitted to arrange for its own succession. To allow this president to serve as the Court's agent is a fundamental violation of the separation of powers.\"

So writes Bruce Ackerman, political philosopher, constitutional scholar and Yale law professor, in The American Prospect, vol. 12 no. 3, February 12, 2001. For the complete story, click on the link below.<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/print\/V12\/3\/ackerman-b.html","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"No Justice, No Justices--it's not just a wild-eyed idea from the fringe. After Lincoln's assassination the Congress blocked Andrew Johnson's threat to consolidate the conservative wing of the Court, preventing the replacement of retiring justices by the man made President by John Wilkes Booth. A similar logic applies today, argues distinguished political philosopher and constitutional scholar Bruce Ackerman (author of \"Social Justice in the Liberal State\") in an article published in The American Prospect.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2001\/02\/5412.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}