{"article":{"id":4876,"heading":"Democracy Diffused","author":"ReclaimThe.Net","created":"2000-12-14 21:17:48","modified":"2000-12-14 22:00:00","last_modified":"Fri, 15 Dec 2000 05:00:00","article":"<p>Democracy Diffused <br><br> The Supreme Court decision of December <br>  <br> 12, 2000 marks a triumph of the <br>  <br> privatization of the judicial system and <br>  <br> sounds the death toll for the voice of <br>  <br> the people, silenced by the din of money <br>  <br> and power concentrated in the hands of a <br>  <br> few.  The reckless 5 to 4 decision, <br>  <br> split along party lines flys in the face <br>  <br> of any reasonable perception of <br>  <br> constitutionality and makes a mockery of <br>  <br> the notion of \"equal protection under <br>  <br> the law\", proving that only to mean <br>  <br> \"superior just to those who pay\"--that <br>  <br> rich, white Republicans in Florida <br>  <br> deserve more protection than a retarded <br>  <br> Black man on the \"gurney\" in Texas. <br><br> The brother of the son of the former <br>  <br> head of Central Intelligence, come <br>  <br> President, and his cohorts sabotaged the <br>  <br> fairness and timeliness of the Florida <br>  <br> election process only to win by <br>  <br> \"technicality\"--the first time in over <br>  <br> 100 years that the loser of the popular <br>  <br> vote presumably won the Presidential <br>  <br> election by a minimal lead in the <br>  <br> \"electoral\" vote.  If GWB prevails and <br>  <br> is inaugurated on January 20, it will <br>  <br> not be by the will of the people but by <br>  <br> the wield of corporate power. <br><br> This is a sad day for Democracy.  This <br>  <br> does not mean that it's the end or the <br>  <br> time for complacency-- it's a wakeup <br>  <br> call for all of us to engage in the most <br>  <br> constructive, productive, and resistive <br>  <br> means as necessary to highlight the <br>  <br> injustices and focus on course towards <br>  <br> change.  Your voice as a voter may have <br>  <br> been disenfranchised but your <br>  <br> opportunity to publish your voice has <br>  <br> not--yet.  The mainstream media failed <br>  <br> in its presentation of the election <br>  <br> because it became too centralized, <br>  <br> relying on a single point for <br>  <br> information.  When that information is <br>  <br> wrong for whatever reason such a single <br>  <br> point of \"information failure\" destroys <br>  <br> the integrity of media and the public's <br>  <br> trust. The separation of powers in our <br>  <br> Government is supposed to balance and <br>  <br> diffuse the centralization of power, not <br>  <br> politicize it.   The decentralization of <br>  <br> media and the fair access to publication <br>  <br> and distribution of media is essential <br>  <br> to the health of our dying Democracy. <br>  <br> Too much centralization of power, <br>  <br> whether it be power over governance or <br>  <br> over information threatens the fundamental <br>  <br> freedoms and liberties guaranteed to us <br>  <br> under the Constitution. <br><br> While the \"legalistic\" hijacking of the <br>  <br> Presidency has been a high profile <br>  <br> event, the hijacking of our rights to <br>  <br> access, free speech, and privacy <br>  <br> continues hidden in plain sight within <br>  <br> the corporate power grab called ICANN <br>  <br> (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names <br>  <br> and Numbers).  ICANN, in its annual <br>  <br> meeting in Marina Del Rey, California in <br>  <br> November, 2000, ignored the pioneers and <br>  <br> free speech advocates of an open domain <br>  <br> name system in favor of corporate <br>  <br> interests with close ties to the defense <br>  <br> and intelligence communities as well as <br>  <br> the Republican Party when they selected <br>  <br> 7 \"new\" Top Level Domains \".info\" \".pro\" <br>  <br> \".museum\" \".aero\" \".name\" \"coop\" and <br>  <br> \".biz\" to be entered into the Internet's <br>  <br> Domain Name System (DNS) sometime in <br>  <br> 2110. ICANN's board of directors is <br>  <br> composed of upper echelon IT pioneers, <br>  <br> industry insiders, intellectual property <br>  <br> interests, and even of members of the <br>  <br> corporations selected to \"run\" what <br>  <br> Journalist Brock Meeks has called <br>  <br> \"ICANN's Seven Dwarfs\". <br><br> Many have criticized ICANN's choice of <br>  <br> only 7 new TLDs as \"restricting\" the <br>  <br> namespace instead of \"extending\" it; <br>  <br> others have panned the choices as <br>  <br> outright BORING and for entrenching the <br>  <br> dominant corporate players without <br>  <br> creating new opportunities for community <br>  <br> groups, small businesses and <br>  <br> non-profits. It has been said that TLDs <br>  <br> are the \"people talking\". If new TLDs <br>  <br> are the \"people's voice\", is ICANN for <br>  <br> SPEAKING FOR YOU or CENSORING YOU? <br><br> What's your opinion? <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/reclaimthe.net\/cgi-bin\/forum\/sayit.cgi\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/reclaimthe.net\/cgi-bin\/forum\/sayit.cgi<\/a> <br><br>  <br>  <br> --RTN<\/p>\n","contact":"rtn@reclaimthe.net","link":"http:\/\/reclaimthe.net\/cgi-bin\/forum\/sayit.cgi","address":"http:\/\/reclaimthe.net","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The \"privatazation\" of the US Judicial system means the \r\n death toll for Democracy and a wakeup call to action.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2000\/12\/4876.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}