{"article":{"id":3440,"heading":"Maquiladoras","author":"Paul  Hays","created":"2000-08-29 00:28:09","modified":"2005-08-15 00:24:48","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:24:48","article":"<p>The Maquiladora Program in Mexico: A critical View Focusing on Employees, The Environment and Developement. <br><br> Geography of Latin America : Geography 450 <br><br> Georgia State University  <br><br> May 24, 1996 <br><br> By Paul Hays <br><br>    In 1965 the federal government of Mexico in Mexico City   <br><br> D.F. formed the Border Industrialization Program which <br><br>  allowed the first maquiladoras (assembly plant).This was in <br><br> response to the forced return of Mexican contract laborers <br><br> (braceros) from the United States as well as the aging of  <br><br> Mexican baby boom which began in the 1940's. A basic <br><br>  definition of a maquiladora plant is a factory on Mexican  <br><br> soil where foreign-based subsidiaries of firms from  <br><br> other countries can assemble products whose components were  <br><br> originally produced in the U.S.A. or other county and then  <br><br> the product is exported back into usually the U.S.A. <br><br> Sevral advantages exist such as duty-free entry of  <br><br> machinery, materials, and tax-free ownership. (O'Brien  <br><br> 1990) Mexico gathers 40% of its total income through these <br><br>  factories. (O' Brien 1990) 80% of all maquiladoras are  <br><br> owned by firms headquartered in the U.S.A.; while fully 68%  <br><br> of the investment in such factories comes from the United  <br><br> States. (La Botz 1994) The remainder of such factories are  <br><br> owned by European or Japanese firms. A few are owned by  <br><br> South Korean or Taiwanese corporations. Geographically  <br><br> speaking, most of the firms are located within Northern  <br><br> Mexico near the 2000 mile Mexican-U.S. border. In 1992  <br><br> there were almost 3,000 factories employing 750,000 workers  <br><br> according to the text book: ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY. This border  <br><br> region  'has a per capita income 50% above the national  <br><br> average.\" (4) Mexican maquiladora workers are very young  <br><br> and 66% are women. (La Botz 1990) Pat O' Brian writing for  <br><br> the Phoenix Business Journal in 1990 remarked that many   <br><br> seem to be high-school age. hese workers also seem to have  <br><br> a low level of education; at least if we compare them to  <br><br> people in the U.S. A study by the Flagstaff Institute in  <br><br> Arizona estimated that workers in Nogales a city in Mexico  <br><br> on the border have completed 'an average of 8.7 years of  <br><br> schooling, while maquila laborers in the interior averaged  <br><br> 10.6 years.' (O'Brien 1990 While this seems low to us these  <br><br> averages are higher than in other states of Mexico. <br><br>     According to the publication World Developement a  <br><br> monthly publication: the 1994 entry-level salary was the  <br><br> equivalent of 87 cents an hour. There is a similar level of  <br><br> benefits some of which include paid vacation, subsidized  <br><br> cafeterias, small transportation subsidies and food  <br><br> coupons. Many of these benefits are required by Mexican  <br><br> law. Some maquiladoras are 'fly-by-night operations and are  <br><br> reffered to as swallows (golondrinas in Spanish. In both  <br><br> cases the work is hard and numbing with a 15% annual  <br><br> turnover rate. many persons who work in these factories  <br><br> live in squatter housing, in company dormitories or with a  <br><br> friend. <br>  <br>     The exploitation side has received much less news in  <br><br> the U.S. media. Low-wages, repetitive work that causes  <br><br> carpal-tunnel injuries and the lack of decent housing in  <br><br> many instances are not the only factors associated with  <br><br> this work. One major un-addressed problem is with the human  <br><br> environs. Daniel La Botz wrote an article recently in The  <br><br> International Journal of Health sciences. He described  <br><br> frequent rapes when women leave the factories. Sexual  <br><br> harassment of young women is common as well on the job.  <br><br> Both severe and less-severe violations often go unreported  <br><br> due to a variety of reasons accordiong to attorneys, social  <br><br> workers, and activists. Daniel La Botz also exposed  <br><br> horrible conditions  that related to muscoskeletal  <br><br> disorders, the use of dangerous solvents that cause  <br><br> numbness and cancer-causing agents produced in large scales  <br><br> and illegally dumped. Persons who organize or just try to  <br><br> do something are fired, harassed or sometimes beaten. Mr La  <br><br> Botz reported blaclists for those who try to organize  <br><br> independent unions and most factories are unorganized with  <br><br> only state-controlled unions allowed. A small independent  <br><br> union movement exists and was instrumental in the Hyundai  <br><br> Heavy Truck Chassis Assembly protests which received aid in  <br><br> the United States from igc.apc.org. <br><br>    While humans are suffering unfairly and sometimes  <br><br> horribly (the finding of many dead women in one town) the  <br><br> environment is being  quickly and massively polluted.Much  <br><br> of the problem stems from the fact that existing laws are  <br><br> not enforced. For example 'of the hundreds of thousands of  <br><br> chemical wastes that maquiladoras produce annually, only a  <br><br> small portion is returned to the U.S., as required by  <br><br> Mexican Law.' (6) 'The cost is $200 to $2000 dollars for  <br><br> each barrel to be disposed of in the U.S. So many times  <br><br> maquiladoras stockpile waste at plant sites, sell them to  <br><br> questionable Mexican recyclers. flush them down sewers or  <br><br> dump them in the desert.' (7) <br><br>     TheTijuana River, Imperial Beach in California, The San  <br><br> Pedro River, The New River in Arizona and the Rio Grande  <br><br> near laredo have all been abused to severe earth changing  <br><br> degrees.  The colors of the water, smells and affects of  <br><br> using these waters are so scary that it is obvious someting  <br><br> is wrong. These degrees of pollution have affected crops,  <br><br> water and people with daily discharges of up to 25 million  <br><br> gallons a day of sewage mixed with chemicals at Nuevo  <br><br> Laredo. Babies born in the Lower Rio Grande have brain  <br><br> diseases 3 times higher than the National average and I am  <br><br> certain this is due to chemical pollution of heavy-metals  <br><br> and rare but deadly chemicals. Many of these are used in  <br><br> electronics, computers and other industries. <br><br>     Some people have remmarked that this economic program, while costing young women dearly and polluting large areas contributes to the growth of the Mexican economy. This is only partially true. Much of the input for the products are made in the United States tehn trucked into Mexico. These issues were developed by an article in The Association of American Geographers by R.B. South.  Souith was candid with a view that 'the paucity of linkages with indigeous manufacturers and the pattern of forward linkages to US parent plants raise issues of dependency developement and developement for whom.' (South 1990) <br>  <br>    One view of this lack of Mexican factories producing their own parts is that managers have some role in this problem. 3 writers in the Journal: World Developement cited factors such as being culture bound or 'avoiding the risk and bother of courting local suppliers while they serve out a 2 or 3 year assigment in Mexico.' (Brannon, James and Lucker 1994)  I also read about managers who are given BMW's and drive across te frontier at day do their job and then go back into the U.S. at nightto gated communities. <br>  <br> The amount of business that benefits the United States is staggering. For example, in the San Diego metropolitan area much of the city's $1.3 billion dollars US that are exported to Mexico are due to the buyers who buy for over  <br>  <br> 695 maquiladoras on the border at the city of Tijuana according to an article in the LOS ANGELES TIMES. <br><br>  <br>  <br> LITERATURE CITED <br>  <br> Brannon, J.T.:James,D.D.Lucker, G.W.: Generating and Sustaining Backward Linkages Between Maquiladoras and Local Suppliers in Northern Mexico. WORLD DEVELOPEMENT 22: 1933-1945. <br><br> La Botz, Daniel. Manufacturing Poverty: The Maquiladorization of Mexico. International Journal of Health Sciences 1994. 24: 403-408. <br><br> Lee, Patrick; Kraul, Chris. Uniqueness of Maquiladora Could Fade. LOS ANGELES TIMES 11\/19\/1993. D-1. <br><br> O'Brien, Pat. Young Workers Flock to Maquiladora Plants. The Business Journal-Phoenix 7\/23\/1990.10;1.<\/p>\n","contact":"soyboy_@hotmail.com","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The terrible human costs and environmentals damages due to  the Mexican Maquiladora programs. The Mexico City Bus Drivers Union SUTAUR 100 named for a bus route in the D.F. and the PRI crushing of this union in 1996 with various means including kidnapping of Judge Uzcanga and his eventual death.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2000\/08\/maquilador.txt","filesize":"7.8 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2000\/08\/3440.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}