{"article":{"id":2155,"heading":"HOLY SMOKE AND MIRRORS: THE RISE OF CENTRIST THEOCRATS","author":"Norman Solomon","created":"2000-08-18 13:21:38","modified":"2005-08-15 00:23:51","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:23:51","article":"<p>August 10, 2000 <br><br> HOLY SMOKE AND MIRRORS: THE RISE OF CENTRIST THEOCRATS <br><br> By Norman Solomon <mediabeat> <br><br> \tIt's always dangerous when politicians claim to be <br>  <br> doing God's will. So, as the novelty fades from Al Gore's <br>  <br> selection of Joseph Lieberman, journalists should ask some <br>  <br> probing questions about the ticket's conspicuous piety. <br><br> \tOver the years, Republican policymakers have been <br>  <br> fond of saying that they rely on divine guidance. Cementing <br>  <br> his alliance with fundamentalist Christian groups, President <br>  <br> Reagan loved to perform at high-profile prayer breakfasts <br>  <br> and the like. All too often, political leaders -- especially <br>  <br> conservative ones -- have tried to blur the separation <br>  <br> between church and state. <br><br> \tNow, the Gore-Lieberman campaign has launched itself <br>  <br> with a very public display of devout posturing. For them, <br>  <br> the Old Testament has become fine grist for the centrist <br>  <br> mill. The New Democrats are morphing into New Theocrats. <br><br> \tAt Tuesday's formal announcement of his selection <br>  <br> for the V.P. slot, Lieberman declared that Gore \"has never, <br>  <br> never wavered in his responsibilities as a father, as a <br>  <br> husband and, yes, as a servant of God Almighty.\" The vice <br>  <br> president stood a few feet away, beaming. <br><br> \tEvidently, in the current political milieu, private <br>  <br> beliefs and personal prayer aren't sufficient. To really do <br>  <br> the trick, faith must be flaunted. What good is religiosity <br>  <br> if you don't wear it on your sleeve and get a lot of good <br>  <br> press? <br><br> \tColleagues laud Lieberman as someone of impeccable <br>  <br> morality, a judgment echoed by countless reporters and <br>  <br> pundits. Yet a strong argument could be made that he <br>  <br> promotes extremely immoral policies -- if we look beyond <br>  <br> such matters as sexual behavior and public profanity. <br><br> \tBy all accounts, Lieberman is personally nice. But <br>  <br> he is politically cruel. For instance, his scrupulous morals <br>  <br> do not extend to Iraq, where several hundred thousand <br>  <br> children have died in recent years due to the U.S.-led <br>  <br> sanctions that he enthusiastically supports. <br><br> \tConnecticut's junior senator urges quick deployment <br>  <br> of the perilous \"missile defense\" boondoggle. And this <br>  <br> Bible-quoting moralist has continued to push a wide range of <br>  <br> new multibillion-dollar weapons systems, which just happen <br>  <br> to mean huge revenues for the arms manufacturers that have <br>  <br> fattened his campaign coffers. For military contractors, <br>  <br> Lieberman is a visionary prophet for profits. <br><br> \tWhether Al Gore is truly \"a servant of God Almighty\" <br>  <br> can only be a subjective matter. But the guy he chose for <br>  <br> his running mate is certainly a devoted servant of Dollar <br>  <br> Almighty. Few Democratic members of Congress are more eager <br>  <br> to undermine the public sector. Lieberman wants taxpayers to <br>  <br> subsidize vouchers for private schools. He has been <br>  <br> outspoken in support of partially privatizing Social <br>  <br> Security. <br><br> \tIn contrast to his media reputation as a consumer <br>  <br> advocate, Lieberman joined with only three other Senate <br>  <br> Democrats in 1995 to put a cap on punitive damage awards in <br>  <br> product liability cases. He's on record in favor of slashing <br>  <br> capital gains taxes. Like Gore, George W. Bush and Dick <br>  <br> Cheney, he is a fervent backer of NAFTA, the World Trade <br>  <br> Organization and other devices for globalization on <br>  <br> corporate terms. <br><br> \tThe world's poor people rank quite low in Joe <br>  <br> Lieberman's universe of values. As for Palestinians, his <br>  <br> brow does not even furrow for them. A down-the-line <br>  <br> supporter of Israel, he has proved to be comfortable with <br>  <br> the systematic violations of human rights in occupied <br>  <br> territories, underwritten by billions of dollars from the <br>  <br> U.S. government. <br><br> \t\"Lieberman may be a committed Orthodox Jew in his <br>  <br> personal practice, but in his role as a public spokesperson <br>  <br> he has gone far away from the best aspects of the Jewish <br>  <br> tradition,\" Rabbi Michael Lerner points out. \"He has none of <br>  <br> that prophetic voice that leads Jews to criticize our own <br>  <br> Jewish community and Israel in the name of Torah values. He <br>  <br> has none of that Jewish sensitivity to the oppressed that <br>  <br> would place their needs above the needs of the wealthy.\" <br><br> \tLike most other senators, Lieberman has built his <br>  <br> career by serving the interests of the rich. Now that he <br>  <br> looms very large on the national political stage, Lieberman <br>  <br> is well-positioned to further corporatize the Democratic <br>  <br> Party. Lerner is on target when he comments: \"Lieberman is <br>  <br> likely to accelerate the process in which the two major <br>  <br> parties seem to be merging into one pro-business, <br>  <br> pro-wealthy, elitist and morally tone-deaf governing force.\" <br><br> \tThe men on the 2000 Democratic ticket represent a <br>  <br> new theocratic style. Eager to evoke Judeo-Christian unity, <br>  <br> they make a show of rejoicing in shared monotheism. But <br>  <br> judging from policy priorities, the one god that they most <br>  <br> revere is Money. <br><br> \tCorporate media outlets keep praising Joe Lieberman <br>  <br> as a paragon of moral virtue. But actions speak much louder <br>  <br> than pious words. He is a disaster. <br><br> _____________________________________________________________ <br><br> Norman Solomon is a syndicated columnist. His latest book is <br>  <br> \"The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media.\"<\/mediabeat><\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"\tIt's always dangerous when politicians claim to be\r\ndoing God's will. So, as the novelty fades from Al Gore's\r\nselection of Joseph Lieberman, journalists should ask some\r\nprobing questions about the ticket's conspicuous piety.","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2000\/08\/holy_smoke.txt","filesize":"5.0 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2000\/08\/2155.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":2158,"heading":"Welfare for sale to the highest bidder?","article":"Both George W. Bush and Al Gore are on record as supporting arch-conservative Marvin Olavsky's movement to turn over welfare to \"faith-based\" organizations.  That's right BOTH candidates...So no matter who we vote for (with the exception of Ralph Nader of course) we are going to be looking at a frontal attack on the division of church and state in this country sometime in the next four years.  Olavsky claims that it will be a fair competition and that \"both Wiccans and Scientologists\" will be allowed to compete with the more powerful churches.  Bullshit!  The Church of Scientology (a dangerous cult of mind-control and greed that abuses it's followers with Nazi-like punishments) with it's high profile celebrities and vast coffers of wealth will of course probably have a prominant place in this \"new order.\"  But Wiccan?  No way are they going to let smaller faiths like Wiccans compete fairly.  With both candidates also on record supporting the teaching of \"creationism\" in the public schools, one wonders how long freedom FROM religion will be tolerated by the Republicrats.  Vote Nader!","author":"Greenman","parent_id":2155,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2000-08-18 13:44:11","modified":"2000-08-18 13:57:07","fileurl":""}]}