Resolution supporters enter city hall.
Proposed RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SANTA MONICA OPPOSING UNITED STATES PREEMPTIVE MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ
WHEREAS, THE GOVERNMENT HAS ESTIMATED THAT A WAR WOULD COST FROM 60 TO 200 BILLION DOLLARS, NOT INCLUDING A POST-WAR OCCUPATION, RESULTING IN LESS FEDERAL FUNDING FOR EDUCATION, HEALTH CARE, TRANSPORTATION, JOB TRAINING, HOUSING, AND ENVIROMENTAL CONCERNS IA A TIME OF INCREASING NEED FOR RESIDENTS OF SANTA MONICA; AND
WHEREAS, AT $100 BILLION, AS CALCULATED BY THE NATIONAL PRIORTIES PROJECT, A WAR WILL COST THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AT 10.1 BILLION IN INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAXES, AND THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA $36.1 MILION, AT A TIME WHEN THE STATE ALREADY SUFFERS FROM AT LEAST A $25 BILLION DEFICIT, FUTHER DECREASING AVAILABLE FUNDS TO SUPPORT LOCAL NEEDS; AND
WHERAS, AS OF FEBURARY 11, 2003, MORE THAN 70 UNITED STATES CITIES AND COUNTIES, ALONG WITH THE MAINE AND HAWAIIAN HOUSE OF REPRESENATIVES, HAVE TAKEN A STAND AGAINST A PREMPTIVE MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ; AND
WHERAS, A WAR IS EXPECTED BY THE CIA TO PROVOKE TERRORIST ATTACKS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, PUTTING SANTA MONICA LIVES AT GRAVE RISK AND GENERATING EMERGENCY RESPONSES BY LOCAL HOSPITALS AND OTHER EMERGENCY PERSONNEL THAT WILL TAX LOCAL RESOURCES; AND
WHERAS, A WAR WOULD LIKELY RESULT IN A LOSS OF VISITOR AND TOURISTS DOLLARS, AN IMPORTANT SOURCE OF SANTA MONICA CITY REVENUE; AND
WHERAS, A WAR WOULD RESULT IN MILITARY CASUALTIES, INCLUDING UNITED STATES AND LIKELY, SANTA MONICA SERVICE MEN AND WOMEN. ADDITIONAL, A WAR WOULD RESULT IN WIDESPREAD ENVIROMENTAL DESTRUCTION; AND
WHERAS, THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA HAS SOUGHT TO PROMOTE NONVIOLENCE AMONG ITS YOUNG.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA SUPPORTS HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 473 CALLING FOR THE UNITED STATES TO WORK THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS TO RENEW ARMS INSPECTIONS, ASSURE IRAQI COMPLIANCE WITH UNITED NATION RESOLUTION, OPPOSE UNPROVOKED UNILATERAL FIRST STRIKE MILITARY ACTION AND COMMUNICATE OUR SUPPORT TO THE PRESIDENT, THE CONGRESS AND THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS AS WELL AS TO SENATOR BOXER AND FEINSTEIN AND CONGRESS MEMBER WAXMAN.
The City of Santa Monica Adopts Anti-War Resolution
Santa Monica CA February 11th 2003 Santa Monica joins the more than 70 U. S. cities and counties to oppose “Preemptive Military Action Against Iraq”. Below is a rough draft, the completed resolution should be available early next week. You can contact www.santa-monica.org or call the City Clerk’s Office at (310) 458-8211 for copies.
Santa Monica Adopts Anti-War Resolution
Peace advocate and Vietnam Veteran, Ron Kovic addresses the council. Ron wrote “Born on the Fourth of July” right here in Santa Monica.
Santa Monica Adopts Anti-War Resolution
Mayor Richard Bloom (left) and Ken Genser (center left) listen as Pam O’Connor (right) presents reasons for a no vote. The resolution passed 5 to 2.
Santa Monica Adopts Anti-War Resolution
The words of area youth helped sway long time council member Herb Katz to vote in favor of the resolution
Santa Monica Adopts Anti-War Resolution
Mayor Pro Tem, Kevin McKeown (right) introduced the anti war resolution. Of note: The Santa Monica Library has refused to provide patron records to the FBI. In response to this USA Patriot Act assault, Mayor Pro Tem McKeown and Council-member Genser put before the Council a resolution affirming Santa Monica’s commitment to civil liberties and supporting unabrogated City protection for Constitutional rights.
builder123
by ziggy
your reporting is always appreciated.thanks :-)
Ms.
by Sheila Zovar
Yippeeeee!!!!! I was wondering what was taking so long! Thank you, Santa Monica!!!Anti Anti war vote
by Phillip Morrell
Most of the so called anti war statements that I have heard or seen covered by the media reminds me of a group of children on the play ground yelling na na na na na! "No Blood for Oil" Is as simple minded. In this age of instant information there is no excuse for being so ill informed. I think that most of the opposition has more to do with sour grapes over losing the 2000 election. I also realize that there are many citizens with intelligent and cogent reasons for being against a war. I look forward to hearing form them in the media. As far Saddam Hussein is concerned let me make an analogy. You have a neighbor that was arrested 12 years ago for firing a gun at his neighbors. The police were called and he was placed in custody and his weapons were confiscated. The court told him that he was not to be in possession of any guns. If he is found to be in possession of a gun the court further told he that serious consequences would arise (jail time). Ever since his arrest he has been seen not only with a gun but is collecting them and is trying to acquire a cannon. I just here a shotgun ratcheting a shell… I’ve got to go.Anyway I’m glad to be in a country that allows free speech even if I disagree.
By the way I’m still in the majority.
Looky here!
by Luke
Picture
by Luke
More
by Luke
This is me
by Luke