by Steve Hampton
Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2003 at 10:14 PM
Radical elements of the anti-war movement have used "breakway marches," in which a smaller group breaks away from the main (peaceful and legal) march, and engages in "direct action" of some sort, to good effect in SF, LA, & NYC. At this early stage of the movement, that is probably a good idea. However, once war with Iraq actually breaks out in earnest, radical anti-capitalists should seek to seize control of the main marches themselves, wresting them away from the reformist misleaders, and taking the streets in a massive showing of the power of the people.
The anti-war movement has grown impressively in just a short time, far faster than it did in the 1960's. In large part, that is due to the internet as a tool of communication, but there are doubtless other factors involved as well. Besides the truly massive main demonstrations, which have been completely peaceful and legal, there have also been smaller, more militant and radical, demonstrations, which have broken away from the main march, and engaged in some kind of "direct action": blocking traffic, breaking windows, etc. At this still relatively early stage of the movement, that is probably a good tactic. But it would be much more effective if the entire march could be led into overflowing the bounds of bourgeois legality, and taking the streets in a massive showing of the power of the people. In order to do this, radical anti-capitalists (anarchists and communists), instead of separating themselves from the main demo, must make judicious use of bullhorns to take control of the crowds away from the reformist misleaders. Already the rank and file at the demonstrations show little enthusiasm for the limp, pathetic messages emanating from the speakers' platforms, from Democratic politicians, "men of God," and the like. People have become fed up with the whole contemptible sell-out reformist crowd, which seeks to channel their anger and outrage back into the system, and in particular into support for the Democratic Party. They can be won over to chanting radical slogans, instead of the namby pamby, milquetoast, virtually content-free slogans of the reformist misleaders. Slogans such as: "Strike, strike, strike-- strike against the war!", "Bring the war home!", "Two, three, many Vietnams!", "Defeat U.S. Imperialism!", "Down With Fascist Pigs!" (this one especially when police attacks occur or are threatened), "Soldiers-- Turn the Guns Around!", and others in that vein, can galvanize the protesters to truly militant action-- especially right after the attack on Iraq occurs, when feelings will be running high.
Take the movement to the next level! Bush and the ruling class are stepping up police state terror and repression: we need to step up our resistance also.
Report this post as:
Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2003 at 10:32 PM
I don't really think that any sort of street action, be it a break away march or by yelling more radical slogans will do the trick.
One thing that can turn the tide is massive organizing against the war, talking to friends, neighbors, anyone about the war and convincing them to take action. March, protest, and yes, pressure politicians.
Any other call for action is foolhardy vanguardism which will end up fucking us all in the future.
You can't change the world with words or actions of magic. You change the world with hard democratic (small d) action. No secret formulation of spells (fuck capitalism) or elixers (smash this, breakaway that) will create positive change.
Report this post as:
by Matt Olson
Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2003 at 10:37 PM
"In order to do this, radical anti-capitalists (anarchists and communists), instead of separating themselves from the main demo, must make judicious use of bullhorns to take control of the crowds away from the reformist misleaders."
I'm not sure the crowd want's to be controlled, by radical anti-capitalists, reformist misleaders (some of whom are radical anti-capitalists, if I'm not mistaken), or anyone else. People march because they don' want war. Maybe they want a socialist state, or anarchy, or free health care or to impeach Bush, or to elect a Democratic majority, or whatever. But primarily they don't want war--that's the unifying theme.
Breakaway marches are a legitimate form of expression for those who favor them, but they are (comparatively) small because they represent a radical fringe of dissent. People stay with the main march not because they are cowed by reformist misleaders, but because the breakaway message doesn't resonate with them.
Whether this is because the message is simply too radical, or because things aren't bad enough yet for it to resonate widely, I'm not sure.
People have been waiting for the revolution for decades now. I for one am skeptical that anything short of a long, extended period of acute and widespread economic deprivation will "galvanize the protesters to truly militant action."
Besides, when did "truly militant action" really accomplish anything good for the masses? History shows that armed revolutionaries are often as bad as the juntas they replace, and that their greatest benefit is to make radical pacifists look reasonable to the mainstream by comparison.
Report this post as:
by Steve Hampton
Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2003 at 1:55 AM
After the blatant theft of the White House after the 2000 election by Bush and the GOP, and the use of political assassinations (i.e., Wellstone and Carnahan) and widespread electoral fraud by voting machines in the 2002 Congressional elections, it is sheer cretinism (if not worse) to talk any longer about pressuring politicians as an effective tactic. Only massive civil disobedience and political strikes can stop the war. Chanting radical slogans and giving radical speeches is hardly an attempt at magic, merely a means to an end.
Matt Olson-- The crowds at the rallies are looking for sound political guidance, which they're not getting from the reformist misleaders. My experience indicates they're hungry for a truly revolutionary message. Of course, the common factor now is merely opposition to war. The protesters need to be made to realize that capitalism is the root cause of war, racism, sexism, poverty, etc., and that in order to end war, it is necessary to do away with capitalism.
But I really can't believe you say "Besides, when did 'truly militant action' really accomplish anything good for the masses?" The social gains brought about by the American, French, Russian, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Cuban Revolutions (to mention only a few examples) provide ample answer to that.
Report this post as:
The following post has status hidden:
by Bush Admirer •
Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2003 at 2:18 AM
Pardon me Steve, but there wasn't any "blatant theft of the White House after the 2000 election by Bush and the GOP."
To the contrary, there was an attempted hijacking by Al Gore and his henchmen. The US Supreme Court did manage to reign in the highly unethical Florida State Supreme Court and prevent such theft.
You're paranoid if you think there were political assassinations of Wellstone and Carnahan. Check yourself into a mental hospital for diagnostic tests. No kidding, you really do need to do that. I'm concerned about your health.
Massive civil disobedience and political strikes won't stop anything. The participants simply make fools of themselves. You can count on GW Bush to do the right thing. He won't be influenced by common street rabble, nor should he.
Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2003 at 2:28 AM
Steve, I agree that " massive civil disobedience" can be affective. My calling your talk magical incantation because it was light on organizing and heavy on style.
It seems a debate of style because you are not talking about expanding the number of protesters. You are talking about what those who are allready protesting should/could be saying. There will be no affect if the same number of people turn out chanting your new slogans.
It is as though you are imagining that the right incantation will create that change you are hoping for. It won't.
What will is smart organizing, gathering the largest group possible and not allienating them- to turn this shit around, we need a broad section of civil society to refuse to smoothely go along with the mechanations of war. This includes judges, public administators, truckers, dock workers, anyone who can decide not to push that paper along.
It includes gathering a huge swath of society with diverse interests. Diverse interests probably means folks whose idea of revolution is different from your own. If you know your american history, continental congresses were meeting before any revolutionary calls. There were institutions and individuals ready to make a peaceful transition to something better.
I am someone with strong anarchist affiinities, and your simple call for "more militancy" seems to speak more to the media's idea of anarchy... that is, an idea that anarchists main idea is to create cataclysmic change characterized by chaos. Perhaps I'm reading you wrong....
Report this post as:
OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Presents Night for Hope
Marshall Tuck’s racist dog whistle
Marshall Tuck’s ethnocentrism contradicts Californian values
Debunking Some Anti-Prop 10 Propaganda
Why Should California Choose De Leon Over Feinstein?
Change Links September 2018 posted
More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre
Site Outage Friday
Change Links August 2018
Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land
More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke
Change Links 2018 July posted
More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena
"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena
Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles
Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert!
Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California
Change Links June 2018 posted
The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years
Unity Archive Project
More Local News...
Allo, quelqu'un ? Allo, quelqu'une ?
deral Government Officials are not allowed to take leaflets nor pick up items in privste
Communist Mouthwash Hides Nature of Nations Suffering in Comm Pyramids Ploys
Atlanta: metro Pillage, Poison Gas, Pricks
Atlanta Metro Suffers Under Pillage, Shame lso Political Poison Gases
Fed Says College Students Have More Debt than Previous Generations
Paraphysique de l'insurrection et de l'émeute
Corruption of USA government
"We live in a time of radical counter-enlightenment"
Did Woolsey Fire Cause Radioactive Fallout?
G20 Discusses Preventing Financial Crisis and Small Island Economies
Driver near Campbell San Jose researches Bus Traffic from Northern Mexico
The Death of Small Businesses in Big Cities, Explained
Felons Shw Ninjasred Heavy Truck Tyres
Paraphysique de la consommation/pollution
Paraphysique de l'effet spectateur
Condominium, terrorisme du capital
Debt and Tax Policies Needed to Prevent Crisis Says Finance Watchdog Group
Independent Media Crackdown and Global Social Movements
Abécédaire du fascisme restreint et général
“Animaniacs in Concert!” Starring Voice Legend Rob Paulsen Heads to Portland, Oregon
Socialism in American English
Noske, noskisme réactualisé
Oprah Please Stop Selling Dead Animal Pieces
Down In Smoke SF
Paraphysique du scientisme
USDA Withholds Names Of Turkey Companies Spreading Salmonella
More Breaking News...