Global
Warming / Climate Change - What's it all About?
Zahir
Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
Summarized and
Adapted from On
Global Warming Mind-Fck
So,
is there, or isn't there, man-made Global Warming? What a Hegelian
Mind-fck!
Summary
My
shrewd take on this question is that so long as ushering carbon
credit is the principal underlying agenda of Global Governance, so
long as global warming menace is the means employed by the United
Nations Agenda 21 to forcibly induce changes in attitude and behavior
that give preference to the natural processes of “Gaia”
over human existence and human experience, so long as political will
and its legalisms continue to be enacted on the core premise laid out
in the Club of Rome report “In
searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water
shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality
and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat
which must be confronted by everyone together. ... All these dangers
are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only
through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The
real enemy then is humanity itself.”, the
principal focus of the public's, as well as the scientists', and all
the national and international political pied pipers' attention
should not be on this red herring question of is there or isn't there
Global Warming.
Climate
change due to sun's activity is a natural and cyclic phenomenon. To
overload that phenomenon with the Machiavellian motivation to search
“for a common enemy against whom we
can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of
global warming, water shortages, famine and the like,” is
a cunning misdirection that is sucking up the productive energies of
well-intentioned and concerned people, while enlisting useful idiots
at the grass-roots level to the cause of UN Agenda 21.
The
common public attention should instead be focused on the Carbon
Credit scam and the Global Governance agenda under UN Agenda 21 which
is being diabolically legalized using a multiplicity of propaganda
covers including the fear of Climate Change in order to lend that
exercise “legal” and political legitimacy.
The
subversion by misdirection is worldwide --- no statesman who has any
standing, is standing up to this Big Lie. This grotesque reality of
universal co-option was most perceptively captured in 1970 by a
former FBI agent after reading Carroll Quigley's 1966 book Tragedy
& Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, with these
portentous words:
'The
real value of Tragedy and Hope ... [is the] bold and boastful
admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively
small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a
choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of
course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could
wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of
life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle
down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the
scenes. As we shall see, the network has
succeeded in building its power structure by using tremendous
quantities of money (together with the vast influence it buys) to
manipulate, intimidate, or corrupt millions of men and women and
their institutions on a world-wide basis.' (W. Cleon
Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, pg. 6)
The
tortuous reality of global co-option, as stated by the powers that be
themselves, is that:
“The
few who understand the system will either be so interested in its
profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no
opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body
of people, mentally incapable of comprehending [the system], will
bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even
suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”
Today,
in the latter part of the second decade of the twenty-first century,
the empirical reality around me just tells me that it is only a
matter of time before carbon credit is a done deal, a fait
accompli. The red herring question whether or not there is Global
Warming or Climate Change due to man's activity would soon become a
moot point as global masses come to accept and live in growth chains
under the United Nations Agenda 21. Unlike in nuclear fission
reaction which requires compression pressure to increase to the point
of critical mass to set off the nuclear chain reaction to make a
nuclear explosion, mankind does not appear to have such a critical
mass of compression. We have demonstrated throughout our short
history on earth how much we are able to be oppressed with ease and
still get used to it --- mankind's innumerable prophets' lofty
platitudes of boldly casting aside the chains of servitude
notwithstanding.
This
is what the powers that be are banking on --- our infinite capacity
to not just voluntarily accept servitude, but under the right set of
perception management / psychologically persuasive / pharmacological
cocktails, even come to love it. Aldous Huxley had called this latter
control the “ultimate in malevolent revolution”. That is
the path which has been ordained for humanity by the powers that be
and it is not obvious how hoi polloi can effectively counter
it before it is fait accompli. Platitudes abound, including my
own two cents worth.
These look rather nice on paper, or from pulpits and podiums, even
appear self-evident, but, in the history of civilizations that is
recorded, has never come to pass en masse. In our modernity which is
characterized by universal deceit, when just speaking the plain truth
is deemed to be a “revolutionary act”, when false hopes
and false prophets shepherd the herd to this and that form of
“awakening” and run them in circles, the real ray of hope
perhaps comes from witnessing the daily courage of resistance of the
common man in places like Palestine.
To
percolate that courage upwards, from oppression by visible bayonet
that is resisted through the fight or flight natural response, to
oppression by the more intangible mind-behavior control methods when
one is made to love one's servitude and consequently disarmed of all
courage to resist ab initio, is the hard challenge. A
challenge for those few who do understand the system and are neither
interested in its profits and nor so dependent upon its favours that
it can stop them without killing them.
Here
is an excerpt from statements of dissenting scientists worldwide
which puts an immediate end to the Big lie of “consensus”.
The latest version of this 2008
excerpted report
is the December
8, 2010 U.S. Senate Minority Report
( http://cfact.org/pdf/2010_Senate_Minority_Report.pdf
) which updates this 2008 number of More Than 700 (Previously 650),
to More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made
Global Warming Claims to Debunk Fading “Consensus”.
It begs the question why newsmedia, politicians, scholars, pulpits,
governments, just ignore it. The self-evident answer – those
who know are already playing in the shell game. And those who don't
know? At least some among them refuse to know but think they know
enough to write a whole handbook on it: Unprecedented
Climate Mobilization: A Handbook for Citizens and Their Governments.
The rest --- well, efforts like these is for their sake.
“I
am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.”
- Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
“Since
I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any
funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain
skeptical...The main basis of the claim that man’s release of
greenhouse gases is the cause of the warming is based almost
entirely upon climate models. We all know the frailty of models
concerning the air-surface system.” - Atmospheric Scientist
Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in
meteorology, and formerly of NASA, who has authored more than 190
studies and has been called “among the most preeminent
scientists of the last 100 years.”
Warming
fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When
people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by
science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr.
Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
“The
IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen
to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really
amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically
incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.” -
Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a
board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.
“So
far, real measurements give no ground for concern about a
catastrophic future warming.” - Scientist Dr. Jarl R.
Ahlbeck, a chemical engineer at Abo Akademi University in Finland,
author of 200 scientific publications and former Greenpeace member.
“Anyone
who claims that the debate is over and the conclusions are firm has
a fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous
issues of our time.” - Solar physicist Dr. Pal Brekke, senior
advisor to the Norwegian Space Centre in Oslo. Brekke has published
more than 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles on the sun and solar
interaction with the Earth.
“The
models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they
only are based on mathematical models and presented results at
scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” -
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of
Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico
“It
is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is
only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic
global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist
Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.
“Even
doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually
have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles
as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” –
. Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and
Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.
“After
reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing
skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” -
Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the
statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American
Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is
an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.
“The
Kyoto theorists have put the cart before the horse. It is global
warming that triggers higher levels of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere, not the other way round…A large number of
critical documents submitted at the 1995 U.N. conference in Madrid
vanished without a trace. As a result, the discussion was one-sided
and heavily biased, and the U.N. declared global warming to be a
scientific fact,” Andrei Kapitsa, a Russian geographer and
Antarctic ice core researcher.
“I
am convinced that the current alarm over carbon dioxide is
mistaken...Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and
are not based on good science.” - Award Winning Physicist Dr.
Will Happer, Professor at the Department of Physics at Princeton
University and Former Director of Energy Research at the Department
of Energy, who has published over 200 scientific papers, and is a
fellow of the American Physical Society, The American Association
for the Advancement of Science, and the National Academy of
Sciences.
“Nature's
regulatory instrument is water vapor: more carbon dioxide leads to
less moisture in the air, keeping the overall GHG content in
accord with the necessary balance conditions.” –
Prominent Hungarian Physicist and environmental researcher Dr.
Miklós Zágoni reversed his view of man-made warming
and is now a skeptic. Zágoni was once Hungary’s most
outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol.
“For
how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand
that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go
on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science
committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has
authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala
University in Sweden.
“Gore
prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly
found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can
at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.”
- Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in
man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the
Dutch UN IPCC committee.
“The
quantity of CO2 we produce is insignificant in terms of the natural
circulation between air, water and soil... I am doing a detailed
assessment of the UN IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy
Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted
the science.” - South Afican Nuclear Physicist and Chemical
Engineer Dr. Philip Lloyd, a UN IPCC co-coordinating lead author who
has authored over 150 refereed publications.
“Many
[scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from
promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers
ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of
the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.
“All
those urging action to curb global warming need to take off the
blinkers and give some thought to what we should do if we are facing
global cooling instead.” - Geophysicist Dr. Phil Chapman, an
astronautical engineer and former NASA astronaut, served as staff
physicist at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
“Creating
an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The
present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control,
a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an
ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist
Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical
Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
“CO2
emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every
scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global
warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s
seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda
Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology
Research at Chubu University in Japan.
“The
[global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact
that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning
Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific
Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at
the University of La Plata.
“Whatever
the weather, it's not being caused by global warming. If anything,
the climate may be starting into a cooling period.”
Atmospheric scientist Dr. Art V. Douglas, former Chair of
the Atmospheric Sciences Department at Creighton University in
Omaha, Nebraska, and is the author of numerous papers for
peer-reviewed publications.
“But
there is no falsifiable scientific basis whatever to assert this
warming is caused by human-produced greenhouse gasses because
current physical theory is too grossly inadequate to establish any
cause at all.” - Chemist Dr. Patrick Frank, who has authored
more than 50 peer-reviewed articles.
“The
‘global warming scare’ is being used as a political tool
to increase government control over American lives, incomes and
decision making. It has no place in the Society's activities.”
- Award-Winning NASA Astronaut/Geologist and Moonwalker Jack Schmitt
who flew on the Apollo 17 mission and formerly of the Norwegian
Geological Survey and for the U.S. Geological Survey.
“Earth
has cooled since 1998 in defiance of the predictions by the
UN-IPCC….The global temperature for 2007 was the coldest in a
decade and the coldest of the millennium…which is why ‘global
warming’ is now called ‘climate change.’” -
Climatologist Dr. Richard Keen of the Department of Atmospheric and
Oceanic Sciences at the University of Colorado.
“I
have yet to see credible proof of carbon dioxide driving climate
change, yet alone man-made CO2 driving it. The atmospheric hot-spot
is missing and the ice core data refute this. When will we
collectively awake from this deceptive delusion?” - Dr. G
LeBlanc Smith, a retired Principal Research Scientist with
Australia’s CSIRO (The full quotes of the scientists are later
in this report)
Backdrop
There
is an overarching social theory behind the propaganda of Global
Warming / Climate Change. And that is the construction of one-world
government. That entails, inter alia, how mankind should be
organized, governed, their attitudes and behavior changed, in a
massive reboot of all civilizations into a standardized civilization
with standardized new religion, new habits, new lifestyles, with much
of the planet earth off limits to the vast masses of humanity in the
name of preserving nature, wildlife, environment, Gaia (mother
earth), for future generations. Individual rights to be subsumed
under community rights. Private property rights abolished for the
public (not for the elite who hold property under corporations,
tax-exempt foundations, non-governmental organizations called NGOs,
etc.) Such a massive overhaul of mankind, a global transformation,
cannot be brought about by peoples and nations simply agreeing to
giving up their rights and national sovereignty. So it is to be
accomplished by stealth, in baby-steps, disguised firstly in
nice-sounding mantras easily palatable to the public mind. One of
those nice sounding things is the “green” agenda called
“Sustainable Development”. Secondly, the stealth is
disguised as solutions to crises and menaces that people and
governments would easily accept under conditions of psychological
fear and physical terror. One of those menaces is Global Warming /
Climate Change and its solution is Carbon Credit and Agenda 21.
Similarly, another menace is terrorism, and its solution is global
war on terror that enables instituting global standardized
police-state polices. There are many more aspects to this and covers
the whole gamut of human activity.
To
understand the overarching big picture and why these methods are
actually masks for a Machiavellian game plan, let's begin with the
CFR, Council on Foreign Relations:
“In
short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built
from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like
a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William
James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much
more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.
Of
course, for political as well as administrative reasons, some of
these specialized arrangements should be brought into an appropriate
relationship with the central institutions of the U.N. system, but
the main thing is that the essential functions be performed.
The
question is whether this more modest approach can do the job. Can it
really bring mankind into the twenty-first century with reasonable
prospects for peace, welfare and human dignity? The argument thus far
suggests it better had, for there seems to be no alternative. But the
evidence also suggests some grounds for cautious optimism.” ---
Richard N. Gardner, The Hard Road to World Order, 1974, published in
CFR's Foreign Affairs,
http://thepowerhour.com/articles/HardRoadtoWorldOrder.pdf
So
let's observe the the bottom up methods
applied to build the ‘house of world
order’ to bring mankind into the twenty-first century with
reasonable prospects for peace, welfare and human dignity.
Continue Reading
Source
URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2016/11/global-warming-climate-change-whats-it.html
Global
Warming / Climate Change - What's it all About? By Zahir Ebrahim |
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org 21/21