Cross Police Station, London, 4 September 2006
U.K.: Exposing the integral role of British human rights..."lawyers"
Square Peace Campaign, 17 January 2014
The purpose of this article is to show (beyond the obvious of why), who
& -how- the biggest “Human
Rights”...lawyers in the U.K, not only, work hand in hand
with, but are integral -to- COINTELPRO style, state operations, in the
All around the world from Eastern Europe to Cairo and a place called
Media, in the U.S, people have for years, been
“liberating” state files, that expose state lies.
Illegal operations such as COINTELPRO have long been the bread and
butter tactics, of violent state oppression, including state murder,
around the world.
It may be true that today you could not simply leave a note, rather
marvellously asking that any kind of "door" was left open, so that you
could "liberate" information.
It remains however, that the people can continue to try to go in by
-the front door- to legally challenge head on, the state.
The people can -legally- bring down criminal states, through
groundbreaking actions such as ours, in the High Court, that seek to
expose the truth, to try and protect...life.
"Inspector" Wareing (who will go to prison along with Chief
Superintendent Peter Terry and Superintendent Andrew Robinson..)
descending....vampire like....upon me, in what was a very serious
It has long been obvious, that our own very long campaign, has long
been, the subject of numerous COINTELPRO style operations, where the
only “tactic” the business state has been left
with, is to try to murder us -or- we really will -legally- bring down
the U.K State through groundbreaking High Court actions, before a jury.
Part of our actions would necessarily involve explaining to a jury how
far from impartial "Judges" like to "direct" juries, away
from...evidence and law.
What in some senses made us quite vulnerable, which was -the way- we
long campaigned, also, turned out more than equally, in many ways, to
be strengths, that worked in our favour.
For example, no-one could really argue that we have for many, very long
years, been doing anything else, other than trying to do our bit, to
What is not yet perhaps sufficiently understood (because of the great
lengths that are gone to, to conceal the fact) is the very real role
that high flying, British “human rights” lawyers
who are hand in hand with government, play in trying to smash,
campaigns who are doing, what the high flying human rights lawyers, are
not doing, which is..law.
Helpfully, the egos of high flying human rights lawyers, like those of
former Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police, like Lord Blair, still
require their ubiquitous and somewhat vicariously sounding, vanity
projects, called “memoirs”.
In early 2006, the U.K State understood, that the hundreds upon
thousands of pounds, they had already spent on inventing phoney
legislation and so on, in a big push to smash our campaign on May 23rd
2006, was not going to realize their objective.
I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned on May 23rd 2006, in a
case that the state had never intended to have, because they knew they
could never win, by playing the legal system, against Brian, who wasn't
breaking any law.
The U.K State knew that when they failed in legal proceedings against
Brian that also meant that we would both be open to pursue the U.K
State for the rest of our...lives, because that one case would would of
itself, legally go a very long way, to -legally- bringing down the
criminal U.K State.
The police foolishly hoped to just rely on the far from get out of jail
free card, that Parliament (“both houses and black
rod”) told them to do it, so the police could fall back on,
What I know, is that the Metropolitan Police Authority, including the
grandstanding Green...ie, Jenny Jones had to get in the big lawyers,
along with Nick Hardwick, who was the Chair of the IPCC at that time,
to try and work out what they were going to do over the illegality of
They could not come up with anything, because simply following
“orders”, and worse from, Parliament !!!!...is
That is a truth that Ms Jones, from the Green Party dares not whisper.
She gets far more mileage out of playing the role of
Somewhere there is an email that was sent to me showing what Jenny
Jones, very stupidly thought she was saying behind our backs, which
also showed what a cynical back stabbing political bitch she generally
is, way beyond us.
One former Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Lord Blair confirmed
in his memoirs, called “Policing Controversy”, that
it was indeed true that he had intended to remove our campaign, in May
2006, (which they hoped would sidestep the need for far from legal
proceedings against Brian). He goes on about Jenny Jones and Brian
Paddick which was all froth. They might all have internal squabbles,
but they are all united in their desire to screw -the people- over for
Anyway, in legal terms, on that dreadful night, in May 2006, when
columns upon columns, of fluorescent yellow zombies suddenly marched
out of the darkness, around 2am, we just had to make sure that some of
the banners remained, which we did.
The few banners, along with my unlawful arrest, meant they were
legally...out-manoeuvered for eternity.
The U.K State and their media mouthpieces then understood, that the
campaign would survive, which also meant that the absolute treachery of
many, could ultimately be exposed, in legal proceedings against the
State, in the High Court.
The government, the media and the lawyers then -all- knew they had a
very big problem.
As long as our campaign survived -and- challenged the State, it was
always going to become clear at some point, that some pretty high
flying human rights lawyers who were not actually doing anything to
protect us, were in bed with the state, which was not going to do their
careers or firms much good.
The one thing we were very well known for in Westminster Village, was
It is absolutely true that the state only consider who will challenge
them and are they serious.
Westminster Village has always very much feared the fact that we are
quite properly, so...serious.
You can only be serious when it is real people's lives you are trying
In 2006, Steve Grosz from Bindmans in essence boasted to Brian, when
Brian was demanding that Bindmans do something about the fact the
police had no power of seizure, that he (Steve Grosz) was too busy
"transferring" his ill gotten gains...in the Bahamas.
Meanwhile, the biggest problem for the Metropolitan Police was that
they simply could not continue going around unlawfully arresting and
falsely imprisoning us, because there was always the danger that sooner
or later all what became (48) unlawful arrests, against just me (for
example) was going to come back and bite them, very big time.
Obviously, no lawyer was going to ever help us with civil claims.
Nevertheless, by September 2006, there were already too many unlawful
arrests and false imprisonments of myself and other members of our
So one particularly vicious clandestine operation the government tried
to pull off in October 2006 was called FTAC.
“The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre”.
This is how FTAC happened.
FTAC was set up completely off the radar of, and independent of any
political or legal scrutiny.
There was no Parliamentary legislation to back it up, and no judicial
FTAC is a completely illegal, COINTELPRO style operation.
It was created in panic by the U.K State, over what our campaign could
What FTAC does, therefore is part of our High Court Civil Action in
HQ12X02745 where the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has tried
to claim the old chestnut of "public interest immunity" !!
In fact, on September 3rd 2006, a PC Volger specifically targeted and
threatened me, when I was one of a group of five others, including
Steve Jago, outside Downing Street. I wasn't doing anything different
from the others, who were not threatened.
PC Volger threatened to have me sectioned under the Mental Health Act.
His quite irrational, “rationale” was, that I might
be “whacked” (hit)...!! (the term "whacked" can
also mean to be..."assassinated", so it was a very serious threat in
In legal terms what I told this particularly cretinous tool, I had
never come across before in my life, was this.
I told PC Volger, (who made a point of saying he really did work for
the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police) I would summons him to
repeat that shit on the witness stand, in a test case I subsequently
lived to win on September 14th 2006. I could see his tiny brain ticking
over the consequences of how that -legal- response, might pan out.
In response to the FOI REQUEST, (which does not have any number) the
police in their own words, essentially admits FTAC could only be used,
if it can be prove that it is an alleged "mental illness", that causes
you to break the...law.
So you can see the first rather large hurdle the criminal state could
not get over.
The criminal state could not prove, I was “breaking" any
A psychological flaw, that fatally undermines the whole psycho-babble
of the morons running FTAC, is that FTAC have completely failed to take
into account several important facts...that would ...protect life,
which is not what FTAC are really about.
It is obvious to any responsible person that the apologists and
collaborators who make up FTAC do not apply the same "rules", they
apply to the public, to those in...public office.
Yet it is very obvious, to most sentient human beings -around the
world- these days, that it is those hiding behind public office, to
commit serious criminal acts, who are in fact, the real danger to, the
real lives of...millions of innocent civilians everywhere.
Bombs that are brutally murdering, innocent civilians...do not just
magically appear out...of thin air.
Anyway, on September 3rd 2006, a furious Brian came to Downing Street
and sensibly rang the police to report the actions of PC Volger, who it
turned out, had been seconded to Charing Cross Police, from
SEPTEMBER 4TH 2006.
Between September 4th & 5th 2006, Steve Jago then saved my
life, when he was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned, when I
answered police bail at Charing Cross Police Station over an unlawful
arrest and false imprisonment on August 5th 2006 (where as usual what
was missing was any -evidence- against me).
Nevertheless, Laura Higgs from Bindmans Solicitors, had written to me
to say that an Inspector Wareing from Charing Cross Police, had
informed her that I was going to be (albeit maliciously) charged, with
obstructing the highway on August 5th 2006 during a Stop the War Rally,
so the lawyers did not need to accompany me, for what should have been
What Bindmans Solicitors will never be able to explain away in any
court of law, is how after events unfolded rather differently, on
September 4th 2006, their lawyer -left- Charing Cross Police Station,
late at night, still without my having been charged over what I had
answered police bail expecting to be charged over at...9am that
It was clear that maliciously charging me with anything...was the last
thing the police wanted to do.
The Metropolitan Police had just planned to disappear me by any means.
It was Steve Jago who saved my life, no thanks to lawyers. It is the
old case of you can’t just disappear two bodies at the same
time from a...police station. Steve Jago turned out to be way too big a
fly in the ointment, of any plan, whichever way they tried to play it,
because he was a witness to much.
What actually happened on our arrival at Charing Cross Police Station
on September 4th 2006, was that Steve Jago calmly raised with police,
the question of why police had threatened me, when I was with four
other people, outside Downing Street, the previous day.
(There was also an earlier, clearly connected
“event” on the morning of September 4th 2006, where
a naked woman with Mental Heath problems was taken away in an ambulance
from Parliament Square while it was sealed off by police, because she
claimed that she had been raped. What people who passed Parliament
Square would remember was...a)naked woman, b)ambulance and c)police.)
Anyway, when Steve raised the question of the previous day outside
Downing Street we were eventually -both- “invited”
into a corridor behind the reception area, in Charing Cross Police
Station, which the police subsequently claimed was without CCTV, where
Steve began to film their response (it was agreed in court that it was
lawful for Steve to film)
So the Metropolitan Police illegally attempted to stop Steve lawfully
filming, when they suddenly violently attacked him, which took me
completely by surprise too.
This situation then unfolded thus.
I see Steve to my right, being suddenly violently attacked by a gang of
plain clothes criminals, some of whom, like Detective Inspector Woods
Meanwhile, to my left, I have this person in plain clothes who turns
out to be Inspector Wareing, standing under a doorway further away from
me, probably to try to obscure what he was doing from CCTV, the police
claimed they never had, which was that he was bizarrely beckoning me to
go with him.
Had I gone with the man who was only later identified, as Inspector
Wareing, this would mean, by extension, leaving Steve Jago who was
being violently assaulted, to an...unknown fate, which it would never
in a million years have crossed my mind to do.
What I actually did was take a deep breath, and hope like hell the door
in front of me, we had just come through, was not locked, before I
slammed the door handle down once, with what Steve says was one very
loud bang, to run like hell to try and get help...for Steve.
What the subsequent police “interview” tape has me
explaining quite honestly, is that I was trying to go and get help for
Steve, who was being violently assaulted by plain clothes...criminals
we had never come across before in our lives. We had no idea who these
people even were. I was just trying to get enough time to use my mobile
phone, to alert Brian or a lawyer to get some help for...Steve !!.
What Inspector Wareing will never get away with not being able to
explain before any jury, is the fact he illegally concealed evidence by
removing audio from the CCTV in the reception area of Charing Cross
Inspector Wareing concealed audio that showed:
a) Steve Jago asking questions about the incident outside Downing
Street, which leads to the police inviting us both behind closed doors
b) Steve Jago then asking while I am running trying to get help, if
someone could please get some real police, because the police had been
violently assaulting him.
What the whole incident had actually triggered was a fight for
What had gone through my mind in a flash (back) was that this unfolding
incident was remarkably identical to corrupt plain clothes police in
Turkey, putting a gun to my head, when I was travelling with an
American friend in 1984. In that incident, we had ended up fighting for
our...lives, in the most desperate circumstances.
The sequence of photos does show Steve then later being assaulted
again, by police officers in the downstairs custody area, at Charing
Cross, when he only asked for....a lawyer.
Eventually I was released from City of Westminster Magistrates, on
September 5th 2006, after District Judge Nicholas Evans had to concede
that he could not legally remand me to prison over an alleged
obstruction of the highway (which was not imprisonable), just because
the fruitcakes at the Crown Persecution Service were demanding that he
The documents disclosed thus far, prove that the U.K State did not ever
intend to remand me for an...obstruction of any highway.
The original actual records say the police were prior to events
unfolding, seeking some sort of remand over what remain...unknown
However, the events on September 4th 2006, were not yet finished with.
OCTOBER 14TH 2006.
The police had illegally bailed me back to Charing Cross Police Station
unusually on a...Saturday afternoon, October 14th 2006, over allegedly
"obstructing the police", on September 4th 2006.
It was utter loony tunes on the part of the police to even suggest
someone actually answering police bail, to be (albeit maliciously)
charged, could have been wilfully obstructing the police, who we
subsequently proved anyway, had not been acting in the "lawful
execution of any duty" at any time.
By October 2006, not just the Metropolitan Police were in very serious
trouble, after I had just won my “test case” over
the phoney legislation (SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138) at the Magistrates !! on
September 14th 2006, proving the new legislation had no legs.
It was David Emanual from Garden Court Chambers who subsequently said,
(and worked to cover up the fact) "no-one" had ever "beaten legislation
at the Magistrates Court".
By October 2006, FTAC, was in place.
The last thing police wanted was to charge me with anything else -or-
leave any door open for the obviously massive civil actions that have
begun to follow.
The traditional theory behind police or others using the Mental Health
Act to section “activists”, is that the state can
then do whatever they like to the person. Whatever the outcome of any
“section” under the Mental Health Act, the U.K
State claim you need the "permission" of their courts to bring...civil
proceedings, against the U.K State, if you have been sectioned.
Of course following May 23rd 2006, the lawyers who were never going to
help us with civil actions had every reason to see me...disappeared,
even as early as September 2006.
What then happened on October 14th 2006 looked bizarre.
The police in the custody area, of Charing Cross Police Station were
according to my own lawyer, more arsey than usual, obviously hoping to
provoke something, during a ridiculously long winded...and overly
The search failed to provoke any response from me, and while my lawyer
and I were sitting around for ages, the police then dropped on us, that
they had two psychiatrists there, who they wanted to
Well, I spoke to my lawyer and here is what was said between us.
The lawyer, Maggie Pederson said they would section me, just because
they could, because they had me in a police station, although it was
unlikely I would be held for longer than 72 hours. In legal terms, this
would nevertheless mean, job done for the police, in terms of ... my
"relatively easily", bringing civil actions...against the police.
I instructed my lawyer to write down the questions these so called
“psychiatrists” asked me -and- my responses.
My response was relayed to the police and
“psychiatrists”, who ran like hell.
No-one wanted any record of any “interview” with
After all, whatever I chose to say, about anything, would be
corroborated by...Steve Jago, and others.
Maggie, who was the lawyer on that day, is a very good and decent
lawyer, who was in no way responsible for what the partners at
Bindmans, she was contracted to, were up to. Steve says Maggie was pale
and in shock, when she walked out of Charing Cross Police station, to
update him over that crap.
(The police had continued to further try to delay illegally charging
me, by saying the police still wanted me to see a medical doctor, which
Maggie told them in no uncertain terms was just not going to happen)
And at that time, FTAC was a completely -clandestine- unit, that no-one
yet knew about, which was set up, precisely to avoid any...legal
scrutiny of COINTELPRO style government operations
In fact, the U.K State could only have used FTAC if I would willingly
walk or be trapped into their hands, which was just not going to
The fact that it is now proved that the U.K State used FTAC to try and
prevent legitimate civil actions, over seriously malicious
prosecutions, would -substantially- compound any damages.
My purpose however, in pursuing claims, is to bring effective change
for everyone, to protect life.
HQ12X02745 is a very unusual example (to ever see the light of day) of
repeated state criminality to try and cover up mounting state
FTAC could not make out any case that I was “breaking
laws” -because- I was...mentally ill, because I
hadn’t as a strating point, actually...broken...any laws.
The most the U.K State had against me was one seriously illegal ruling
(see: CO/4002/2006) trying to...ban me from campaigning.
That ridiculous "ruling", only exposes the murderous U.K State
CO/4002/2006: TUCKER V DPP
In practical and legal terms, the use of FTAC who we would have made
mincemeat of, legally, would only have hastened...exposure of
Parliament’s (“both houses and black
rods”) attempt to smash our campaign on May 23rd 2006.
On September 3rd 2006, I had told PC Volger I
would...“summons him to repeat his shit”, just as
we would have with the entirely illegal and clandestine, FTAC, who
would have been publicly humiliated.
Anyway, all that particular, but very dirty legal shenanigans, then had
to disappear and we returned to the relatively normally, way things
play out through the corrupt courts in the usual way, until we
finally...won, all those cases.
We won over the unlawful arrests and false imprisonments over August
5th 2006, at City of Westminster Magistrates on July 9th 2007, (when
the CPS had no evidence to offer against me, while telling the court it
had always been illegal to..charge me)
And we then won on appeal at Southwark Crown Court, in December 2007,
(over the obstruct pc September 4th 2006 case which was unusually heard
at City of Westminster in January 2007 until it was
“adjourned” until May 2007) long after corrupt
lawyers who also wanted to bury us, had run from what became civil
claims that will -legally- bring down the criminal U.K State.
Footnote: I wasn’t meant to win on Appeal at Southwark Crown
Court, in December 2007. Knowing the script is mostly written in
advance, I waited and finally quite literally, pulled out of my back
pocket, what became, the winning legal argument, written in pencil, on
a scrap of paper.
Steve Jago had been found to have no case to answer at half time, so it
was clear I was the one, they were still going for, when they continued
I trumped the mendacity of the Crown Court, using a higher court ruling
from a case called Wilmott v Atack, which says, unless there is malice,
there cannot be any wilful ...obstruction.
The Judges at Southwark Crown Court, sent us out -twice- for cigarette
breaks while they took instructions on how they were supposed to
over-rule a higher court ruling, which was impossible.
Finally, the Judges churlishly thanked me from between gritted teeth
for "bringing the higher court ruling to their attention", while the
police from Charing Cross, looked on absolutely...fuming.
Infiltration of the campaign had not been able to forewarn them, of
that sting to their own tail.
I also got five hundred pounds back in “costs”, in
cash, in a brown envelope !! when I told the court, I would Judicially
Review the court trying to give me a cheque, when I handed over a
receipt for...the cash, corrupt lawyers who no longer acted for us, had
What I have the evidence to prove in a court of law, before a jury,
about high flying corrupt human rights lawyers, who work hand in hand
for the government, to smash campaigns, is this.
FOOTNOTE: It is clear that my refusal to be bought off in the High
Court, on December 6th 2012,is what is most likely to have led to the
Mayor of London and the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police,
deciding to breach an EU Directive to violently kidnap Neil on December
Ian McDonald who is the senior partner at GARDEN COURT CHAMBERS (along
with a junior called David Emanual) sought with -all- the Partners at
Bindmans Solicitors, including Steve Grosz, Mike Schwarz, Paul Ridge
and John Halford, to cover up that the police had no power of seizure
on May 23rd 2006 which was the big public...media push to smash our
This included the very COINTELPRO use of Wallinger’s State
Britain (which was paid for by the government) to try and hijack the
voice of our campaign, again through the media.
The police, courts and lawyers could not put us on any witness stand
with the...lawyers there, over the illegal seizure on May 23rd 2006.
This is why they all talk about Ian McDonalds grandstanding when Brian
was found to have no case to answer, in January 2007, yet the display
of Genocide was not returned.
I can then prove that Bindmans (and then Birnberg Pierce) then
illegally refused to represent me in High Court civil actions, over the
years, over numerous illegal searches which were used from July 29th
It is beyond either on the balance of probabilities or a reasonable
doubt, that the illegal searches happened -because- we had effectively
won on July 15th 2008 in CO/11393/2007 at the High Court. We
effectively won, when I asked for a court order for the immediate
return of property, which the Judges refused...without giving reasons,
which they must !!
I can then prove that (& the Bar Society knew that) Mike
Schwarz, a partner at Bindmans then seriously illegally, used
-financial blackmail- against Michael Mansfields, Tooks Chambers.
Mike Schwarz from Bindmans told a barrister called Annabel Timan who
was with Michael Mansfield’s Tooks at that time, (before she
moved to Doughty who do have some dirt on their hands) that she would
not get any more work, if she did not withdraw on the day of trial,
from representing me in a "test case" in February 2010, when I could
have been imprisoned.
The only reason Brian and I were not imprisoned then, when the state
was quite desperate, following my naming the agent provocateur in
separate proceedings, was because Brian kept his lawyer.
Brian kept his lawyer, because had we gone to prison the lawyers would
all have been -legally- embarrassed trying to explain that.
By 2010, Brian had however, just dropped Bindmans, after we had a
meeting with Mike Schwartz in Central Hall in Westminster. At that
meeting, Brian and I saw with our own eyes, that it was clear Bindmans
were trying to help the police cover up, that six members of the TSG
had attempted to murder me at Belgravia Police Station on September 4th
Bindmans can never explain in a million years why they did not
immediately have that CCTV footage, when they knew we intended, if they
did nothing, to bring a private prosecution.
There was a memorable conversation quite a long time before that, when
Brian challenged Mike Schwarz from Bindmans, with the line:
“Babs asks if you will continue (going round in circles with
the police) “arguing” over the police 101st set of
(pointless) conditions, (or do your job) ?” to which Schwartz
could not answer.
So by the time Mansfield from Tooks finishes his self serving memoirs
in June 2010, (not long after February 2010) Mansfield knows that his
firm Tooks, has been successfully -blackmailed- by Bindmans, to keep
silent about Bindmans and Tooks, direct involvement in government
efforts to...smash our campaign.
The provable -fact- of lawyers being open to and subject to, financial
blackmail, over representing a client, who could be imprisoned, would
of itself be enough, if a jury should ever hear of it, to lead to both
Bindmans Solicitors and Mansfield’s Tooks Chambers, being
That provable fact, makes reading Mr Mansfield's ubiquitous vanity
project in 2010, where he styles himself as a “radical
lawyer”, much more revealing.
I am not sorry that Mr Mansfield is retiring. I only believe that the
real reason Mr Mansfield, was so pissed off in the Duggan trial in
September 2013, was because he discovered that his own firm was going
to be pissed on, by the same state he pretended to challenge.
I do genuinely believe that rather than Mr Mansfield’s quite
appalling public grandstanding, years earlier, over the Ricin plot, Mr
Mansfield would have provided a far better service to his client, had
he dealt with the fact that there was no evidence of Ricin, long before
any show trial.
Mr Mansfield knew that the CPS have an ongoing duty to
review...”evidence”, in a case that should never
have been allowed to go to trial, because there was no evidence of any
It was in May 2010, Mr Mansfield’s good friends at Birnberg
Pierce which he helpfully names in his memoirs, as including Marcia
Willis Stewart, were then brought in to try and help the Mayor of
London (and Birnberg’s own Matt Foot) cover up all that had
gone before, including CO/11393/2007 and the illegal searches (although
there was by then, much else for lawyers to try and cover up too)
Mr Mansfield and Co. were of course, also helping out another of his
good friends he unsurprisingly names as Ian McDonald of Garden Court
Overall, Mr Mansfield’s "memoirs" adopt the familiar tone of
the patronizing Establishment.
Parasitic human rights lawyers know damn well, that doing law, which is
not what these parasitic lawyers are doing, does not require
anyone’s...approval. The "plight" of Palestinians, does after
all, involve human rights lawyers in the U.K, choosing to not really
take the U.K State to task...through the courts....over the Balfour
I should also mention that it was Matt Foot (one of Paul Foot's sons
and the nephew of Michael Foot) from Mansfield’s "friends" at
Birnberg Pierce, who had illegally refused for two whole years to go to
the High Court over the illegal searches), is the person directly
responsible (along with Bindmans Solicitors), for my ending up
illegally imprisoned in Holloway in 2011, because I was without legal
representation and so the court had no reason to bother with the
niceties of any...trial.
Of course in 2010, the Mayor of London never had any evidence against
either Brian or I, and the Judge choked in 2011, when I mentioned (and
so the Judge was forced to concede) that no costs could be awarded
against Brian and I, that would go to the Mayor of London’s
equally corrupt lawyers, because CO/11393/2007 (for example) is
It was Paul Ridge a partner at Bindmans who fronted the legal "defence"
of the Mayor of London’s phoney...COINTELPRO style, Democracy
Village that...everyone has relentlessly tried to
“join” us with.
I would actually like to see Paul Ridge imprisoned for a very long
time. Mr Ridge actually...smirked...when he was confronted, in a pretty
much behind the scenes argument, in the High Court, over the
involvement of Bindmans in the police attempting to murder me at
Belgravia Police Station on September 4th 2009.
I guess the U.K State needed a super psycho lawyer like Ridge, who
really had no conscience whatsoever, to “represent”
the phoney COINTELPRO style Democracy Village/Peace Strike in 2011
& 2012 in proceedings involving the Mayor of London and
Westminster Council etc, and us.
It was onlookers who were repeatedly surprised to discover that
Birnberg Pierce were supposed to be Brian’s own..lawyers, in
the claim brought against us by the Mayor of London, because Birnberg
Pierce behaved as anything...but, Brian’s own lawyers.
In legal terms, it all started to come unstuck for the U.K State,
before the wheels came flying off their carriage completely (over years
of abuse), and the tables turned, with my still existing counterclaim
in HQ11X00563 against Westminster Council and others.
That began when, you guessed it, my very dearest friend, Steve Jago,
filed papers, in HQ11X00563 while I was illegally imprisoned in
Holloway, in August 2011.
I had learned during the long drawn out proceedings against us, brought
by the Mayor of London, that the Judge will just bury any Application
that you make, which happened to be an Application that there was no
evidence against us. This Application was buried until the day of
trial, when the Judge was able to just carry on regardless, knowing
one, had no opportunity, to Appeal that Application.
I had filed the Application that the Mayor had no evidence against
Brian or I, on September 13th 2010, when the hearing of our Appeal in
the Court of Appeal had led to a -retrial- back in the High Court in
Marcia Willis Stewart from Birnberg Pierce who represented Brian, never
made any such Application, while no-one ever produced a single shred of
anything that could be called -evidence- against our campaign.
Of course on January 16th 2012, the police once again illegally used
hurried new legislation (ss 141-150 of The Police Reform and Social
Responsibility Act 2011) that like SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138 which was then
repealed, could never really be used to “prosecute”
us over, this time either.
In particular they could not use new legislation -because- of the
outstanding counterclaim in HQ11X00563, that grew into other claims.
The state cannot -legislate- to try to make by any means, including
your death, existing civil claims...disappear (HQ12X03564)
The fact that the state did do -all- that, is actually evidence that
they knew we would -legally- bring down the U.K State through the High
Court in our groundbreaking actions.
By 2012-2013, Birds Solicitors (along with numerous other law firms who
could not fly the coop quick enough around that time, one after the
other) did not have a hope in hell of covering everything up, including
the involvement of numerous high flying humans rights lawyers, who had
Birds were first used by Brian over his unlawful arrest on August 2010,
which involved a malicious prosecution. Neil, Steve Jago and I,
concluded the case against Brian, in Brian's favour, by publishing the
video that continues to be evidence in all other proceedings, of the
illegal use of agent provocateurs.
It is too easy to explain to any jury -why- Birds Solicitors, illegally
refused to go to Bishopsgate Police Station in the City of London on
April 10th 2013, to get Neil released, after Neil was kidnapped by
secret 666 police, after we left the High Court on April 10th 2013.
Birds Solicitors could never explain in a million years before any jury
-why- Neil was illegally held at Bishopsgate Police Station in the City
of London, on the basis of an unsigned warrant Charing Cross Police
clearly filled in themselves, leaving blank the part the Judge...must
Had Birds gone to Bishopsgate Police Station which they were legally
obliged to do, because there was no valid warrant, Neil would have had
to be released.
But Birds Solicitors, refused without lawful excuse, to go to
Bishopsgate, because they did not want Neil released either.
In fact there was a very serious and quite furious argument, relatively
-"behind the scenes"- the following day, when Birds Solicitors, were
trying to refuse to represent Neil at Westminster Magistrates, because
of that very fact, relating to the bogus warrant, (and of
Ideally lawyers would like you to keep going to one lawyer after
another lawyer, instead of lawyers, having their noses rubbed in
It is very clear from our website, that Birds Solicitors should have
gone to the High Court, a very long time ago, to stop the state trying
to, by this stage openly...pretty much...murder us.
Our website from January 2012 to February 2013 shows our being
subjected to the most appallingly relentless state abuse, that very
clearly put our lives at very serious...risk.
And on April 10th 2013, Neil and I could so easily have become yet more
Mark Duggans, when Neil was driving out of London after our leaving the
Of course while Neil in his own right, as a gifted film maker, poses
his own quite extraordinary “threat” to the U.K
State, because it is legal to record and publish court proceedings, the
U.K State also knew only too well, as fellow campaigners do, of my
personal relationship with Neil.
Neil can be quite gorgeous :)
By April 2013, many high flying “human rights”,
lawyers had...so many vested business interests, in seeing Neil, Steve
and I, all...dead.
Not a single one shed a tear when Brian died, which all the very many
lawyers, very clearly bear, very substantial responsibility for too.
On April 11th 2013, Neil who should have been brought before City of
Westminster Magistrates, in the morning session, which was usual for
those held overnight, was held in court cells, until late in the
afternoon, because Birds Solicitors were arguing behind the scenes
about...coming to court,to represent him !!
It was Steve Jago who quietly but firmly...persisted, until Birds had
no choice but to send along a lawyer to City of Westminster
Magistrates. Of course, the court played their part by trying to keep
calling the “case” on, only to be repeatedly told,
the lawyer inexplicably still hadn't..showed up.
We swiftly resolved the malicious prosecution against Neil over April
19th 2013, in our favour, by filing witness statements, that we wrote,
had to be put on the court record, while refusing to physically go back
to City of Westminster Magistrates. An outstanding malicious
prosecution the Mayor of London brought against me was similarly
terminated in our favour, at Southwark Crown Court around the same
The point is this.
Our groundbreaking High Court actions (and sadly there are many other
claims to still bring) -include- exposing the very serious dirt on the
biggest high flying “human rights” lawyers in the
U.K, who remain, not only hand in hand with, but integral to, the
COINTELPRO style operations, run by the State.
This state of affairs, involving bogus human rights lawyers, cannot
A jury is going to seriously ponder, over what the lawyers were -NOT-
doing to protect us, which we hope will improve legal representation,
We will nevertheless, continue to bring law, into all we do, to protect