There is delusion, and then there is willful fantasy. At what point does the first pass into the second?

Wherever on the anti-science continuum lies the point we might wish to pinpoint, surely global-warming denialists have slid past, riding a toboggan down a slope so steep it threatens to become a cliff. And with the snow rapidly melting, there are many exposed rocks that could bring the ride to a sharp halt.

Unless you live in Seattle, Dublin or Edinburgh, this Northern Hemisphere summer has been difficult to ignore. The United States last month experienced its hottest month in recorded history, breaking the record set in July 1936 at the peak of the Dust Bowl, when farming became nearly impossible in the Great Plains because of heat and drought. As the Dust Bowl years of the mid-1930s still weigh heavily in the U.S. psyche, that is a particularly dramatic record.

To continue reading, please go to http://wp.me/p2cpPS-2G

what
"Northern Hemisphere summer has been difficult to ignore."
Well, so have the increasingly severe winters, early snows, late snows, snow where there hasn't been any in many decades, record colds etc. etc. etc.

Just another feverish piece about how the weather is a result of the dis proven 'warming' trend'

Global Warming Fraud? | Conservative News, Views & Books
When hackers released thousands of documents generated by climate scientists at the highly influential Climatic Research Unit at Britain's University of East Anglia last year, much evidence of fraud, dishonesty and mistakes in support of the theory of man-made global warming came to public light
http://www.humanevents.com/2010/06/09/global-warming-fraud/
CO2 blah blah, greenhouse gas emissions blah blah danger danger blah blah...
This totally ignores the role of HAARP, chemtrails and the incentive of a weather war waged against the people to yoke them with a carbon tax, paid to the IMF.
HAARP: Weather Control
HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a little-known, yet critically is such a powerful technology it could be used to heat the ionosphere to turn weather into a weapon of war.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/war/haarp_weather_modification_electromagnetic_warfare_weapons
It's all there look it up.

When you watch science denial in action, you will see the same sort of arguments being used over and over, often in much the same order. Here is a handy cut out and keep guide, with examples from creationists, climate change deniers and the tobacco industry.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/A_comparative_guide_to_science_denial

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Denialism


http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theories

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/HAARP

you notice that the monkeys can't read the previous sources but are able to come up with their own [1 ] source from an unknown source [ except to itself ] !!!
Yes, the IMF is using HAARP to extort a carbon tax from the people.
bite me

http://www.qando.net/?p=12377

Global cooling?
Published January 31, 2012 | By Bruce McQuain

But, but, polar bears, rising oceans, melting ice, oh my:

The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years. The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century. Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.

So we still have the freak weather which points toward another force acting upon our weather patterns.
Remember that the issue of a carbon tax to the IMF is a matter of billions if not trillions of dollars worth of potential wealth redistribution i. e. profit for interested parties.
I also believe that the banking cartel of degenerate, psychopaths is the center of the dark network which has permeated all aspects of our civil society for revenue collection purposes.
They alone have the incentive and power to control policies, institutions and even military operations under a veil of 'national security' to direct hidden agendas. Only, this agenda is not quite so well hidden if one observes the relentless stream of 'climate change / 'global warming' propaganda pieces which are now trying to equate genuine skepticism in view of open data, to mental illness. How very Soviet Union of this tactic.
***
Global cooling?
Published January 31, 2012 | By Bruce McQuain

But, but, polar bears, rising oceans, melting ice, oh my:

The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years. The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century. Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.

Objection: Global temperatures have been trending down since 1998. Global warming is over.

Answer: At the time, 1998 was a record high year in both the CRU and the NASA GISS analyses. In fact, it blew away the previous record by .2 degrees C. (That previous record went all the way back to 1997, by the way!)

According to NASA, it was elevated far above the trend line because 1998 was the year of the strongest El Nino of the century. Choosing that year as a starting point is a classic cherry pick and demonstrates why it is necessary to remove chaotic year-to year-variability (aka: weather) by smoothing out the data. Looking at CRU’s graph below, you can see the result of that smoothing in black.

Clearly 1998 is an anomaly and the trend has not reversed. (Even the apparent leveling at the end is not the real smoothing. The smoothed trend in 2005 depends on all of its surrounding years, including a few years still in the future.) By the way, choosing the CRU analysis is also a cherry pick — NASA has 2005 breaking the 1998 record, though by very little.

Now, this is an excusable mistake for average folks who do not need the rigors of statistical analysis in their day jobs. But any scientist in pretty much any field knows that you cannot extract meaningful information about trends in noisy data from single-year end points. It’s hard to hear a scientist make this argument and still believe they speak with integrity in this debate — seems more like an abuse of the trust placed in them as scientists. Bob Carter is just such a voice, and was the first to trot out this argument in an article in the Daily Telegraph. Since then it has echoed far and wide and been used by Richard Lindzen as well as a host of skeptic websites.

Interestingly, Bob Carter seems to know what he is doing. He tries to pre-empt objections in his article by insinuating that any choice of starting point (say, 1978) will just be a cherry pick with the opposite motive! But cherry picking is about choosing data for the sole purpose of supporting a pre-conceived conclusion. It is not the simple act of choosing at all. One must choose some starting point. In the case of his example year, 1978, it’s often chosen simply because it is the first year that satellite records of tropospheric temperatures were available.

So what choices are there? What are the reasons for those choices? What conclusions we can draw from them?

As mentioned above, you could choose to examine the last 30 years — that is when both surface and tropospheric readings have been available. We have experienced warming of approximately .2 degrees C/decade during this time. It would take a couple of decades trending down before we could say the recent warming ended in 1998.
You could choose 1970 in the NASA GISS analysis — the start of the late 20th century warming, and as such a significant feature of the temperature record. The surface temperature over this period shows .6 degrees C warming.
You could choose 1965 in the CRU analysis — when the recent warming started in their record. It shows around .5 degrees C warming of the smoothed trend line.
You could choose 1880 in the NASA record — it shows .8 degrees C warming.
You could choose 1855 in the CRU record — it shows .8 degrees C warming. As with the trend above, we can not say it is over without many decades more data indicating cooling.
You could choose to look at the last 500 years in the bore hole record analysis — that is its entire length. It puts today about 1 degree C above the first three centuries of that record. In that kind of analysis, today’s record will be hidden from view for many decades.
You could choose to look at the last 1,000 years, because that is as far back as the dendrochronology studies reliably go. Then the conclusion is:

Although each of the temperature reconstructions are different (due to differing calibration methods and data used), they all show some similar patterns of temperature change over the last several centuries. Most striking is the fact that each record reveals that the 20th century is the warmest of the entire record, and that warming was most dramatic after 1920.

You could choose to look at the entire period of time since the end of the last ice age, around 10,000 years ago. Then the conclusion is that GHG warming has reversed a long and stable period of slight downward trend, and we are now at a global temperature not experienced in the history of human civilization — the entire Holocene. It will be many centuries until such a long view of today’s climate is available. The situation is a bit more urgent than that!

That about covers any period of time relevant to today’s society. “It has stopped warming” is only supported by selecting a single year out of context and using a seven-year window to look at multi-decadal trends in climate. That’s a classic cherry pick.

‘There is no evidence of significant global warming’ — Yes, there is

http://grist.org/climate-energy/there-is-no-evidence/



‘The temperature record is unreliable’–But temperature trends are clear and widely corroborated

http://grist.org/climate-energy/the-temperature-record-is-simply-unreliable/


‘The scientists aren’t even sure’ — No scientist ever is

http://grist.org/climate-energy/the-scientists-arent-even-sure/

http://grist.org/climate-energy/there-is-no-proof-that-co2-is-causing-global-warming/


The satellites show cooling’–No, they don’t

http://grist.org/climate-energy/the-satellites-show-cooling/


http://grist.org/series/skeptics




http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/blog/5808/just-facts-aint-enough-maam

back for more,Bozo?
aren't all of your pathetic 'sources' from the same site?
oh, and, what?...cosmos magazine? wow

Isn't that "cherry picking"? No, wait; it's fishing in your own fishbowl! ha ha ha

Sorry, Bozo. there is no warming trend, no excuse to burden the people with a carbon tax and not even support for your meaningless conjecture.when one considers the various factors now open to anyone with a curious mind.
In fact, under the above circumstances, [scroll up, dear reader ] it would be up to the Operation Cloverleaf and HAARP directors to provide oversight to assure these technologies are *not* being used to wage a war of weather on the people to extort a carbon tax under the fig leaf of "geo-engineering" and research.

‘The satellites show cooling’–No, they don’t

Objection: Satellite readings, which are much more accurate, show that the earth is in fact cooling.

I wonder how long before this one stops coming up?

Answer: There are a few advantages to the satellite readings,mainly the more uniform global coverage and the fact that readings can be taken at different altitudes. However, it is an extremely complicated process which uses microwaves emitted by the oxygen in the atmosphere as a proxy for temperature.

The complications arise from many things, including decay of the satellite orbits, splicing together and calibrating records from different instruments, trying to separate the signals by the layer of atmosphere they originate from, etc. It is a little ironic that the same people who distrust the surface record so happily embrace this even-more-convoluted exercise in data processing!

Anyway, it has been many years since the satellite analysis showed cooling.

Until recently, though, one of the many analyses of tropospheric temperatures did show very little warming and was in direct contradiction to model predictions that say the troposphere should warm significantly in an enhanced greenhouse environment. Something had to be wrong, the observations or the model predictions. Naturally, the skeptics had no doubt it was the models that were off.

However, it turns out that additional errors were uncovered and the MSU Satellite temperature analysis now shows warming well in line with model expectations. Real Climate has a good rundown of the technical details for those with the stomach for it. In short, this long-running debate turned out to be a great validation of the models and a real death blow to the “earth is not warming” crowd.

Beware of zombies!

oh, gee. all the way to 2005 when the raw data was 'lost' in 2009 !

Climategate: They have lost the data upon which the theory of global warming is based they knew it was lost years ago but failed to disclose it
http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-c-2009-11-29-240479.112112_Climategate_They_have_lost_the_data_upon_which_the_theory_of_global_warming_is_based.html
so, as I've said before, any charts from such is bull flop.
where do you get this stuff?
I know one thing, we sure have some dedicated defenders of this piece of global warming propaganda that can't deal with real issues of threats to our biosphere,
[ scroll up, see for yourselves ]

Objection: Despite what the computer models tell us, there is actually no evidence of significant global warming.

Answer: Global warming is not an output of computer models; it is a conclusion based on observations of a great many global indicators. By far the most straightforward evidence is the actual surface temperature record. While there are places — in England, for example — that have records going back several centuries, the two major global temperature analyses can only go back around 150 years due to their requirements for both quantity and distribution of temperature recording stations.

These are the two most reputable globally and seasonally averaged temperature trend analyses:


NASA GISS direct surface temperature analysis

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/


CRU direct surface temperature analysis

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/



Both trends are definitely and significantly up. In addition to direct measurements of surface temperature, there are many other measurements and indicators that support the general direction and magnitude of the change the earth is currently undergoing. The following diverse empirical observations lead to the same unequivocal conclusion that the earth is warming:

Satellite Data

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_temperature_measurements


Radiosondes

http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/temp/angell/angell.html


Borehole analysis

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/pollack.html


Glacial melt observations

http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/glacier_balance.html


Sea ice melt

http://nsidc.org/news/press/20050928_trendscontinue.html


Sea level rise

http://sealevel.colorado.edu/


Proxy Reconstructions

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/paleolast.html


Permafrost melt

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18725124.500


There is simply no room for doubt: the Earth is undergoing a rapid and large warming trend.

'sea level rise
The first one I picked...

Changing Tides: Research Center Under Fire for 'Adjusted' Sea ...
The University of Colorado's Sea Level Research Group decided in May to add 0.3mm every year to its actual measurements of sea levels, sparking criticism from experts who called it an attempt to exaggerate the effects of global warming.
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/06/17/research-center-under-fire-for-adjusted-sea-level-data/
I suspect each and every one of the URLs Bozo has given is from a carbon tax friendly source.


D

Www.humanevents.com has one IP number (108.171.169.20) , which is the same as for humanevents.com.

Humanevents.com point to the same IP. You might also be interested in the competitors: jihadwatch.org, newsmax.com, worldtribune.com, townhall.com, spectator.org and powerlineblog.com.

Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS


www.wanttoknow.info

Fred Burks -

"The evidence is inconclusive"

The zionists obliged my predictions with an ENMOD event

they are still spraying chemtrails

Go ahead and pay this ultra tax, this insurance, and know that it doesn't amount to anything, because the weather is controlled


they have successfully called a hurricane direct hit nearly a week ahead of time? ENMOD. HAARP.

The Jews News

The Jews Choose

Luxefaire.com And Autodidactics.com Back In Service

The HAARP Patent

DEVILVISION: My Book About ENMOD Chapter 1-11

ah yes, the inference to 'denialist' and dehydrated water.
Only the most dedicated denialist would rule out the obvious weather war being waged on the people of Earth to extort a carbon tax to the IMF which has all the elements of a crime.
Method Opportunity and Motive

didn't hit Tampa, it hit the Louisiana sink hole then just went right over us

this is why the radiation here went down then back up again BTW

I obtained a sample of that rain too, a rather unique sample well worth getting up for

Is that the best they have?
To not address the prospect of a deliberate and artificial weather modification [ war ] to serve the IMF and their carbon tax agenda is to be a raving 'denialist'.

that's point # 1

# 2 is you can't admit it

# 3 is you have never collected much less tested any chemtrail samples, ever

so what do we have?

- unsubstantiated claims from a person making money selling unsubstantiated claims.

there you go again, making up crap with out any foundation like a quote with a a URL about what you're saying I said.
Weather War is a valid military concept and the IMF has a vested interest in making it happen, as well as having monkeys like 'Hex' dance for it.

I have a year and a half of rain samples all reduced to powder and checked for radiation.

As usual, 'Hex' is using the tactic of diversion.
Where did I ever say I took chemtrail samples? This is about the motivation, opportunity and method the IMF has to produce freak droughts and storms to goad the people into a carbon tax.

by HAARP v. 'Global Warming' Thursday, Aug. 23, 2012 at 3:46 PM

http://www.wanttoknow.info/war/haarp_weather_modification_electromagnetic_warfare_weapons
It's all there look it up.

"The evidence is inconclusive"

And then we have this:
Activist Post: Weather Wars and the Devil's HAARP
The weather forces of Earth are volatile indeed. Even in the human era we have passed through cataclysmic times of both fire and ice, destruction and rebirth; recorded throughout the world in legends and religious texts.
http://www.activistpost.com/2010/08/weather-wars-and-devils-haarp.html

the above article cites these two "experts" -

Vincent Gray

http://www.desmogblog.com/vincent-gray

Gray's signature is displayed alongside a full-page ad funded by the CATO institute that appeared in numerous newspapers including the Washington Post, the New York Times and the Chicago Tribune in 2009.

Gray was a speaker at the Heartland Institute

A search of 22,000 academic journals shows that Gray has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal on the subject of climate change. Gray has published peer-reviewed scientific work on coal.


http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Vincent_Gray


Tim Ball

http://www.desmogblog.com/tim-ball

"scientific advisor" to the Exxon-funded Friends of Science (FoS), and is associated with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy (FCPP) as well as numerous other think tanks and right-wing organizations.

Dr. Michael Mann sued Tim Ball and the Frontier Center For Public Policy for libel.


http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tim_Ball

more distraction and proven fraud.
The only thing that cannot be addressed is the obvious incentive for the IMF to yoke the people with a carbon tax:

What do HAARP, Chemtrails, and Global Warming all have in ...
By Barbara H. Peterson. Farm Wars. Chemtrails are bad news. They contain barium and aluminum, which have the potential to destroy ecosystems around the world.
http://farmwars.info/?p=2731

I'm not going to play this cat & mouse game

You have no data to support 'chemtrails'

and big energy echo chamber FUD isn't science

I do far more important things than sell trinkets and misinformation - I have 3 radio stations to run, among other things. Real over the air broadcast stations, not internet bitcasts..

You could be doing something useful like making radiation detectors. But I highly doubt you have the skill. Rock tumbling seems to be about your limit.

I've given away how to build 4 different designs -

http://hackaday.com/2011/03/18/seeed-looks-for-help-developing-an-open-source-radiation-detector/#comments

I started out looking through a microscope lens in the dark for radiation, now a year and a half later theres 4 designs.

4 years ago I started out with 1 radio station, now theres 3, all in stereo too. One has a DRM datastream that sends pictures you can decode without any special hardware, just by feeding FM tuner audio into your soundcard and running winDRM

If I can do things like these surely you can collect 1 lousy chemtrail sample

proven climategate fraud
Junk Scientist Fraudsters Deleted Data That Proved Earth Was ...
Climategate: it's all unravelling now Climate Depot- Daily Express Junk Scientists deleted global cooling data that showed the earth was cooling not ... There is no confidence that any of the data is real. Global warming is a fraud.
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/junk-scientist-fraudsters-deleted-data-that-proved-earth-was-cooling/blog-206411/

Objection: Global warming is a hoax perpetrated by environmental extremists and liberals who want an excuse for more big government (and/or world government via the U.N.).

This is a common line, regardless of how ridiculous it is, so it should not go unanswered.

Answer: Here is a list of organizations that accept anthropogenic global warming as real and scientifically well-supported:

NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS): http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm

National Academy of Sciences (NAS): http://books.nap.edu/collections/global_warming/index.html

State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC) – http://www.socc.ca/permafrost/permafrost_future_e.cfm

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): http://epa.gov/climatechange/index.html

The Royal Society of the UK (RS) – http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=3135

American Geophysical Union (AGU):
http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_position.html

American Meteorological Society (AMS): http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/climatechangeresearch_2003.html

American Institute of Physics (AIP): http://www.aip.org/gov/policy12.html

National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html

American Meteorological Society (AMS): http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/jointacademies.html

Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS): http://www.cmos.ca/climatechangepole.html

Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean, and/or atmosphere agrees that the climate is warming rapidly and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions. In addition to that list, see also this joint statement (PDF) that specifically and unequivocally endorses the work and conclusions of the IPCC Third Assessment report. The statement was issued by:

Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias (Brazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academie des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)

You can also read this statement [PDF], which includes all the above signatories plus the following:

Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

But if scientists are too liberal and politicians too unreliable, perhaps you find the opinion of key industry representatives more convincing:

BP, the largest oil company in the UK and one of the largest in the world, has this opinion:

There is an increasing consensus that climate change is linked to the consumption of carbon based fuels and that action is required now to avoid further increases in carbon emissions as the global demand for energy increases.

Shell Oil (yes, as in oil, the fossil fuel) says:

Shell shares the widespread concern that the emission of greenhouse gases from human activities is leading to changes in the global climate.

Eighteen CEOs of Canada’s largest corporations had this to say in an open letter to the Prime Minister of Canada:

Our organizations accept that a strong response is required to the strengthening evidence in the scientific assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). We accept the IPCC consensus that climate change raises the risk of severe consequences for human health and security and the environment. We note that Canada is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

Have the environazis seized the reigns of industrial power, in addition to infiltrating the U.N., the science academies of every developed nation, and the top research institutes of North America? That just doesn’t seem very likely.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/global-warming-is-a-hoax/

http://grist.org/climate-energy/there-is-no-consensus/

http://grist.org/series/skeptics/

The Climategate scandal erupted on November 19, 2009, when a collection of email messages, data files and data processing programs were leaked from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) located in the UK, revealing scientific fraud and data manipulation by scientists
http://conservapedia.com/Climategate

and now these parrots are repeating the same crap.
The IMF needs to tax you for your 'carbon footprint'

Independent Climate Change Email Review.

http://www.cce-review.org/About.php



"Climategate" exposed: Conservative media distort stolen emails.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2009/12/01/climategate-exposed-conservative-media-distort/157590

exxon, coal, and now this 2 year old, debunked smear campaign

..still waiting for those chemtrail samples

The HAARP program.
HAARP chemtrails weather modification electromagnetic weapons ...

Long term consequences of atmospheric heating are unknown. Changing weather in one place can have a devastating downstream effect.
http://www.bariumblues.com/haarp1.htm

Let's take a look at Chemtrails
Chemtrails, an Introduction
Mar 1, 2002.. If you are just beginning to learn about Chemtrails, the following Introductory article below will give you an overview of how this spraying program began in late 1997 and how the situation stood up to early 2000.
http://educate-yourself.org/ct/

so, in essence, the MOM of criminal activity is all there for the IMF to manipulate the weather in a cooling global environment, to produce not only storms and drought, but tectonic warfare
In an exclusive interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre on April 17, 2011, independent scientist Leuren Moret has stated that the radiation war against the populations of the United States, Canada, and Mexico has intensified with the intentional distribution of radiation from the March 11, 2011 Fukushima event over the southern, south-west and west coast regions of the U.S. through a record 241 HAARP-triggered tornadoes and associated rainfall.
http://www.examiner.com/article/scientist-leuren-moret-radiation-war-intensifies-with-haarp-tornadoes-usa

so we have method opportunity and motive here.
what else does one need except for the obvious intensity of the support crew on this globalloney warming, from paid for quackademics and also the sheer spate of articles pushing this proven hoax. Every week another push for carbon taxes and credits. All to the IMF. Imagine that!
Like the war propaganda it shows obvious agendas in the making by its volume and frequency.

it's a pattern
When you show the fraud
they show the coverup
when you show the lost raw data
they go back to the fraud
it's a cycle of numb repetition.
scroll up and see the parrots for yourselves

"lost raw data"

my dog ate the chemtrail samples


So, let's see YOUR radiation graph from your claimed radiation detector, not the EPA's - yours

-you could still build one as I showed how.
the cdv counter software is free, too

I have some youtube clips that show other inventors doing the same thing, I'll find them

2N3055 Alpha Detector

De-canned 2N3055 power transistor detecting alpha particles from an Americium -241 source.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKNNXvzo8UU



Homemade Pin Diode Geiger Counter - Alan Yates

Another radiation detection circuit I made. I found it online, and the person who designed it was very kind to assist me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl-UggVIDuA



Photodiode Gamma Ray Detector

More progress on gamma photon detection using junkbox photodiodes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOEL18OKTUA


And the dude's website :

Alan Yates' Laboratory - Photodiode Gamma Ray Detector

ahh, the psycho-gatekeeper. kissy face with johnk again?
how time flies.
aside from the obvious interference run from our old psychopath, 'Hex' [ we can now depend on huge amounts of inane graphics, off topic rants, over-spaced noise and OCD riddled fixations...] the topic that seems to trouble these individuals is the riddle of the cooling globe with record cold periods and snow borne disasters to a now waxed 'global warming' fraud.
So we hear the nonsense phrase "climate change" rammed into the breach of open discovery about the data manipulation destruction and loss at this same time.
So very interesting.
Shut down HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf.

http://www.vk2zay.net/article/265

See ^ insted of spewing disinformation you could be building something useful.


This weeks community affairs :

Weekly Fukushima update, for.

september second, 2012

Radiation levels, over the past week, have averaged, around, 130, counts per minute which is, about, 12 times, normal background level.

Cobalt, 58, is being detected, in japan.

Half life, is only, 71 days.


and, neutron activation products, like Cobalt, 60, are also in rubble



a, mysterious disease, is killing seals, along, the U S, East, Coast, Fukushima radiation testing, is underway, by government scientists.

Never seen anything like this before.


N R C, denies, reactor license, Only the second time, in history.

(formatting due to text-to-speech requirements)

to answer, I merely need to say read this
http://la.indymedia.org/news/2012/08/255129_comment.php#255308
ya psycho

"the cooling globe with record cold periods"



U S Climate Update, Warmest 12 Months, On Record

The Northern Hemisphere, just experienced, the all time warmest June, on record, at 2.34 degrees fahrenheit above average.

The average temperature, for the contiguous U S, during June, was 71.2 degrees fahrenheit, which is 2 degrees, above the 20th century average, contributing to a, record warm, first half of the year, and the warmest 12-month period, the nation has experienced, since record-keeping began, in 1895.

Scorching temperatures, during the second half of the month, led many cities, to set all-time temperature records.

The nation, as a whole, also experienced its tenth driest June on record.

Record and near-record dry conditions, were present, across the Intermountain West.

Over 170, all-time warm temperature records, were broken, or tied, during the month.

Temperatures in South Carolina, 113 degrees, and Georgia, 112 degrees, are currently under review, by the U S State Climate Extremes Committee, as possible all-time statewide temperature records.

If the stinking HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf projects were shut down we would be back to normal weather.
You simply cannot inject gigawatts into the atmosphere without consequences while you're creating a aerial array to augment this operation.
They're the prime suspects in this drought. and the IMF with their proposed carbon tax [ a huge incentive.] is the prime beneficiary.
And my lord, the noise and interest level! In pushing this circus of 'global warming' in a cooling world. You better hurry up, winter is coming! This crap wont fly when people are shivering under record snow levels.

"inject gigawatts into the atmosphere"

that's ERP. I've explained this before. When you have a point source the power is radiated in all directions equally, but when the source is tightly focused (like a laser), the effective power is millions of times higher.

take a 100 watt bulb - not too bright

but focus that light into a thin beam and it will cause instant blindness

And yet even with a high ERP, this energy is still only a drop in the bucket compared to solar energy - the amount of energy the sun radiates into the same layers, everyday.

It makes a 'dent' in the layer that radio signals can bounce off of.

It's classified because it's used to send messenges to nuclear submarines - everything involving the military and nuclear is classified.

The haarp signal is so weak here you can only barely receive it, it's almost buried in noise..

To cause any significant effects they would have to have a large power plant - a city's worth of electricity, not the diesel generators on the remote site you can see pictures of.

People tend to fear what they don't understand.

tinker toy science from a psychopathic liar doesn't count, BTW.
HAARP & Weather War

The HAARP website acknowledges that experiments are conducted which use electromagnetic frequencies to fire pulsed, directed energy beams in order to "temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere." Some scientists state that purposefully disturbing this sensitive layer could have major and even disastrous consequences. Concerned HAARP researchers like Dr. Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa and Alaska's Dr. Nick Begich (son of a US Congressman) present evidence suggesting that these disturbances can even be used to trigger earthquakes, affect hurricanes, and for weather control.
http://www.haarp.net/

Michel Chossudovsky is professor of economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa.

In an op-ed in the conservative Canadian news outlet, Western Standard, Chossudovsky was listed as one of Canada's nuttiest professors "whose absurdity stands head and shoulders above their colleagues.

And criticized Chussodovsky's "wild-eyed conspiracy theories", that Washington had weapons that could influence climate change.



"Dr.” Nick Begich Jr.

Calls himself a doctor even though his doctorate is an honorary one from The Open International University for Complementary Medicines in Sri Lanka, according to his own biography. (which is a shady diploma mill outfit)

Begich is not a scientist or a even a doctor.


It is of paramount importance to verify our sources and look into who you are believing before you run off spreading their information (or disinformation as the case may be) to your friends, family, or through whatever medium you might utilize.

And the compromised 'scientists' who are funded by selective grants and were shown to be committing fraud are somehow now held as using scientific method?
ha
We understand the game of selective disinformation.
You can't prove any climate threat without addressing lost, manipulated and falsified raw data.
Software cheat codes to produce desired results and the huge incentive to use weather control to indulge in speculation and carbon tax extraction for the IMF.

in finding some data to support those theories.

Or, try tobacco companies.

Archived-Articles: Climategate: CRU Was But the Tip of the Iceberg

Jan 22, 2010 ... Just months after the Climategate scandal broke, a new study has uncovered ... climate centers have also been manipulating worldwide temperature data in ... It is that data which NOAA receives and disseminates
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate_cru_was_but_the_ti.html
So we still have the freak weather, the freaks who push this baloney and the hunger of the IMF for that carbon tax.
And their control of the various dark networks which pull the strings to make it happen.
HAARP & Operation Cloverleaf.
March 2004

This information is devoted to a short summary of the history, technology, and health effects of Project Cloverleaf, particularly in how it interfaces with multiplying the effects of HAARP technology.

Project Cloverleaf is a joint US-Canadian Military Operation involving distributing chemicals into the atmosphere above Canada and the United States.

Both US military refueling tankers and thousands of planes in private corporate aviation are used.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_chemtrails28.htm

Objection: Climate is complicated and there are lots of competing theories and unsolved mysteries. Until this is all worked out, one can’t claim there is consensus on global warming theory. Until there is, we should not take any action.

This is similar to the “global warming is a hoax” article, but at least here we can narrow down just what the consensus is about.

Answer: Sure there are plenty of unsolved problems and active debates in climate science. But if you look at the research papers coming out these days, the debates are about things like why model predictions of outgoing longwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere in tropical latitudes differ from satellite readings, or how the size of ice crystals in cirrus clouds affect the amount of incoming shortwave reflected back into space, or precisely how much stratospheric cooling can be attributed to ozone depletion rather than an enhanced greenhouse effect.

No one in the climate science community is debating whether or not changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations alter the greenhouse effect, or if the current warming trend is outside of the range of natural variability, or if sea levels have risen over the last century.

This is where there is a consensus.

Specifically, the “consensus” about anthropogenic climate change entails the following:

the climate is undergoing a pronounced warming trend beyond the range of natural variability;
the major cause of most of the observed warming is rising levels of the greenhouse gas CO2;
the rise in CO2 is the result of burning fossil fuels;
if CO2 continues to rise over the next century, the warming will continue; and
a climate change of the projected magnitude over this time frame represents potential danger to human welfare and the environment.

While theories and viewpoints in conflict with the above do exist, their proponents constitute a very small minority. If we require unanimity before being confident, well, we can’t be sure the earth isn’t hollow either.

This consensus is represented in the IPCC Third Assessment Report, Working Group 1 (TAR WG1), the most comprehensive compilation and summary of current climate research ever attempted, and arguably the most thoroughly peer reviewed scientific document in history. While this review was sponsored by the UN, the research it compiled and reviewed was not, and the scientists involved were independent and came from all over the world.

The conclusions reached in this document have been explicitly endorsed by …

Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Bazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academié des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

In addition to these national academies, the following institutions specializing in climate, atmosphere, ocean, and/or earth sciences have endorsed or published the same conclusions as presented in the TAR report:

NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20120806/

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cmb-faq/globalwarming.html

National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
http://books.nap.edu/collections/global_warming/index.html

State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC)
http://www.socc.ca/cms/en/home.aspx

Royal Society of the United Kingdom (RS)
http://royalsociety.org/

American Geophysical Union (AGU)
http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/climatechangeresearch_2003.html

American Institute of Physics (AIP)
http://www.aip.org/gov/policy12.html

National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html

American Meteorological Society (AMS)
http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html


Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)
http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf

If this is not scientific consensus, what in the world would a consensus look like?

(Addendum: One could legitimately argue that such policy statements by necessity hide possibly legitimate internal debate while trying to present unity of position. Science is ultimately determined in peer reviewed journals. Fortunately, there is a bit of research that looked specifically at this very question — the subject of another guide entry.)

error

Work on the HAARP Station began in 1993. The current working IRI was completed in 2007, and its prime contractor was BAE Systems Advanced Technologies.

http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html

Work on the HAARP Station began in 1993. The rise in Global Temperature started between 1910 to 1920 as this graph clearly shows - debunking your HAARP conspiracy theory.

Bill mixes in haarp with global warming denialism

and some 'other persons' on here mix color revolutions with global warming


- and meanwhile radioactive contamination is happening here and now

Nobel: Radioactive contamination in Western US and Hawaii “almost even worse” than Japan -CBS (VIDEO)

error

of course the psychopath needs to change the subject into one of its own peculiar fixations when it used to be a denier of global DU contamination, saying it was "like lead in a battery"... and now it is crowing about the subject of radioactive contamination.
But this is not even the subject of this propaganda piece.
I deny the premiss of global warming as it has been shown to be a fraud in the current cooling period aptly demonstrated if one was to scroll up beyond the barrage of noise.
The HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf projects need to be shut down and the IMF needs to prosecuted for criminal conduct.

The japanese diet found the fukushima disaster was not an accident

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster “Man-Made” Reports Japanese Panel

Fukushima Disaster "Man-Made" & "Preventable.

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/6/as_japan_says_fukushima_disaster_man



And nuclear power contributes to climate change - the EROEI calculations show all the fossil fuel energy that goes into the mining and refining of uranium plus the millions of tons of concrete and steel - all CO2 intensive activities..

What is off topic is haarp, since _you have no supporting data_

We can measure and chart the radiation from the fukushima disaster, you cannot provide one shread of data, measurements or samples for haarp or chemtrails.

If you were a nuclear shill you would be 'doing the devil's work' since the haarp and chemtrail frauds only server to distract from the real issues. By quoting exxon and coal repeatedly even when cited you've already made yourself a willing fossil fuel shill.

You live in some of the most contaminated areas, so it's no surprise you would want to sweep the contamination issue under the rug.

Fortunately some of us care enough to invest the time to design radiation detectors that you can build at home, so you can use them to avoid exposure, and lower your chance of developing cancer, heart disease and other health problems.

It didn't escape my attention that you have no interest whatsoever in ongoing radioactive contamination or public health - even your own.


Notice the inverted logic in play - a person that is actively involved in protecting public health is smeared as a psychopath, while the smearer who shills for big oil and big nuclear infers himself as the opposite.

Didn't you know - psychopaths spend their time doing work for the public good, providing concrete solutions and actions so people can help themselves, for free, with no strings attached..

That's a weird definition, hmmmm let's see :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy


a personality disorder that has been variously described as lacking empathy, coldheartedness, lacking guilt, egocentricity, superficial charm, manipulativeness, irresponsibility, nonplanfulness, impulsivity, and antisocial behaviors.


looks like a bad case of projection ;)

In fact there are suspicious anomalies that were reported before the Fukushima event.
Signatures of HAARP weaponry.

In an exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview by Alfred Lambremont Webre released May 9, 2011, independent scientist Leuren Moret has stated that the Fukushima HAARP tectonic nuclear attack was done by an international racketeering war crimes network within the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Department of Energy (DOE), and BP (British Petroleum) on behalf of City of London bankers.
http://www.examiner.com/article/leuren-moret-fukushima-haarp-nuclear-attack-by-cia-doe-bp-for-london-banks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuren_Moret

"Leuren Moret is a conspiracy theorist"


The Tehran Times has described her efforts as a "crusade".


Leuren K Moret - Real Job at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

http://archive.org/details/LeurenKMoret-RealJobAtLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratory


Leuren K Moret often asserts that she was a "nuclear scientist" at two DOE National Laboratories.

This letter, obtained from the University of California operated Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under the California Public Records Act shows that Moret was not a "scientist" and worked very briefly at the Laboratory.

Moret was a Senior Scientific Technologist in the Center for Applied Scientific Computing for less than a year from 1989 to 1990.

Moret also claims to have been trained in radiation detection by Manhattan Project Scientist Marion Fulk.

Fulk's employment from 1964 to 1984 as a Chemist at the Laboratory is also addressed in this letter.

While Fulk did have prior employment, it is doubtful that he was a "Manhattan Project Scientist".

It also is clear that Moret never worked with Fulk at the Laboratory since Fulk retired in 1984 and Moret began work five years later in 1989.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuren_Moret

"Leuren Moret is a conspiracy theorist"


The Tehran Times has described her efforts as a "crusade".


Leuren K Moret - Real Job at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

http://archive.org/details/LeurenKMoret-RealJobAtLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratory


Leuren K Moret often asserts that she was a "nuclear scientist" at two DOE National Laboratories.

This letter, obtained from the University of California operated Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under the California Public Records Act shows that Moret was not a "scientist" and worked very briefly at the Laboratory.

Moret was a Senior Scientific Technologist in the Center for Applied Scientific Computing for less than a year from 1989 to 1990.

Moret also claims to have been trained in radiation detection by Manhattan Project Scientist Marion Fulk.

Fulk's employment from 1964 to 1984 as a Chemist at the Laboratory is also addressed in this letter.

While Fulk did have prior employment, it is doubtful that he was a "Manhattan Project Scientist".

It also is clear that Moret never worked with Fulk at the Laboratory since Fulk retired in 1984 and Moret began work five years later in 1989.

.wikipedia.
ha, your all in one source that can be 'amended' at the whim of the 'editors' real solid there...
Not hardly.
I've noticed the shills for carbon tax use it frequently.
And of course Moret is being smeared and discredited. It's a common enough tactic as you should well know.
There is no global warming but there sure is a program to control the resources and people of the world.
HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf is the hammer to do it.

error

error

read this
You Know they're Hurting
http://la.indymedia.org/news/2012/08/255129_comment.php#255308
We have an obvious plaster fest of 'climate change' and 'global warming' pieces in a swam of pro carbon tax propaganda.
We have the avoidance of such topic as interested parties, IMF motives and known military projects such as the geo-engineering projects under Operation Cloverleaf.
We have very dedicated weasels pushing it.
Showing their true alignments.
The real 'denialists'.

I've just issued a radiation alert - 35 times normal background.wv

because it's measuring mainly gamma and uses direct detection (the EPA chart draws air through a filter and checks the filter, plus is pure beta)

There's a little secret about the EPA's gamma chart.
Ranges 3 and 5 indicate cesium, but it's a matter of how elevated they are compared to the other ranges (which varies depending on location)

look up the term 'verified'
something the fraud cannot produce after the cooked and whimsical data points for your meaningless charts and graphs are proven to be fabrications

Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming - Forbes
About every four years, the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) produces a voluminous Assessment Report (AR) on the state of global warming science, such as it is. Two years after each AR, the IPCC produces an updating Interim Report
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/03/01/fakegate-the-obnoxious-fabrication-of-global-warming/

The Heartland Institute

"I am a Heartland Senior Fellow"



ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Heartland Institute

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41

this is about weather manipulation to extort a carbon tax in a cooling global environment. For a carbon tax to the IMF.
And the motive for all the propaganda about global warming.
Shut down HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf.

been watching that tumbler too long?

Aside from our psychopathic enabler for the IMF who needs to cover questions with off topic and inane graphics, what do we have?
A dedicated tool for the 'denialists' who are pushing the global warming fraud as hard as they can before winter covers their bull shit in record snow levels.
Like last year.
Shut down HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf.

error

Aside from the OCD about stupid graphics, I've noticed the lame attempt to divert the topic from a point it cannot address.
The IMF and the carbon tax they, with their agents, are tying to push under the flurry of this 'global warming' bullshit.
And the almost psychopathic fervor they push it with.
First, shut down HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf, and then we'll talk.

the world is mine!

as we can all see, the psychopath who is so dedicated in defending the global warming myth retreats into its psychotic obsessions.

And get ready for a long cold winter like the last one.
Another item, these wankers can't deal with in their 'global warming' wank which has been proven as a fraud.
Shut down the HAARP and chemtrail programs.

When one views the tired and predictable noise thrown into the fraud of 'global warming' we still must ask the following question:
who benefits?
Obviously the IMF who these carbon taxes will enrich.
While controlling the fuel and food prices of their subjects.
shut down HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf.
And get ready for a rough winter and higher food prices.
It's a war on the people.

"a long cold winter like the last one."


Spring Begins: Recapping The 2011-2012 "The Winter That Wasn't"


The Winter That Wasn't-2011-12 | Farmers' Almanac Forum


'Winter That wasn't' ranks 10th-warmest in Toledo area


The Winter That Wasn't Checks In at Fourth Warmest | Climate Central


Plants, Animals Signify The Winter that Wasn't

"most of the 2012 buds actually opened in 2011"

Plants, Animals so dedicated in defending the global warming myth

Notice anything?
Like the decent into psychopathy our pro-carbon tax agent quickly falls?
Or the absence of [ valid independent ] collaborating data to support its opinion?
Wandering into its delusional halls of madness, it continues to advocate for the system which has declared war on the populations of Earth through their weapons of technology
A good video to provide some background is:
Why in the World are they Spraying?
A treatise on HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf.

> get ready for a long cold winter like the last one.

Plants, Animals Signify The Winter that Wasn't


Plants, Animals so dedicated in defending the global warming myth.



> [ valid independent ] collaborating data

exxon, coal, and fake scientists




Chris Hedges on "Empire of Illusion"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHle_turjes

After all, isn't this propaganda piece trying to equate skepticism of the fraud involved in the very creation of the CO2 'hockey stick' to some kind of mental disorder?
Not the fabrication of 'raw data' or the software cheat codes to produce said graph from fantasy land?
We do know that HAARP exists as well as the Operation Cloverleaf project from where we see our skies assaulted by obscene chemical trails and our weather used as a weapon for futures speculation and carbon tax agendas.
It is not magic, merely power and greed playing fast and loose with our biosphere.

Animals and plants are in on the conspiracy too - whatever it takes to stay deluded and in denial.

In the twisted and hypocritical pretzel-logic of bill, all prior statements and "facts" are infinitely flexible and reviseable as needed to deny any and all refutations made by other posters, as well as to automatically negate all subsequent facts or logical arguments.

belief will fly in the face of facts, necessities, pressing reality, and even death.

belief is impervious to facts, yet requires none of it's own

belief will run logic in circles, will be repeatedly dead wrong, will tell bald face lies, then ignore them

belief can be wrong an unlimited amount of times, yet is still always right

belief relies on the repetition of sound bites and dog whistles, as the mere soothing sound of soothing lies is all that matters

nothing and no one else matters, not the earth, animals or plants, other people - nothing matters except the soothing lie, the lie that absolves any and all responsibility by blaming anything else and anyone else for everything

the curious thing about these 'graphs' are the fact that the raw data to create them was 'lost'.
While the pro-carbon tax agents keep pulling the fraudulent charts and graphs that are fabricated to promote the fraud of the hockey stick, CO2 temperature projection, HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf remain trivialized while billions are spent on these systems which are assaulting our environment.
We are told to worry about CO2 when our eco-systems are ravaged with the BP oil disaster and radiation poisons the oceans and air and water.

it's completely someone else's fault, therefore I don't need to do anything at all

I'm truly sorry that the previous comment from our resident psychopath has little if anything to support the trashed 'global warming' myth.
Again, let me re-state the obvious.
The IMF is very intent upon a carbon tax for their own greed and power. These dark networks which control our political processes have the method, opportunity and motives to control the weather, produce droughts and create freak storms with the technologies available to them at this very moment through the HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf programs. 'Hex' is obsessively trying to cover this up as the gatekeeper to this well known set of facts.
For fear the real problems of threats to our collective commons and survival will become a point of focus.
The more this 'global warming' propaganda barrage escalates, the more apparent it becomes. Cripple the industrial base of a nation and impoverish the citizenry through a carbon 'footprint' tax.
That's what these overclass assholes have in mind for us while allowing off shore enterprises to operate without any such constraint.
It's a war on the people through weather modification and economic means.
Otherwise we wouldn't have the feverish attempt to promote the dead horse of 'global warming' by beating it so hard.

it's someone else's fault, so I don't have to do anything, but chant my soothing lies

I believe it's apparent that the only chanting going on here is the repetition of the dis-credited 'hockey stick'
'hockey stick' fraud
Fraudulent hockey sticks and hidden data « JoNova: Science ...
Yet there is a disinformation campaign out there by the IPCC and others to promote the idea that it was a local phenomenon and that the Hockey Stick Graph has not been resoundingly, completely shown to be a baseless fraud.
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12/fraudulent-hockey-sticks-and-hidden-data/
No don't anyone dare look at HAARP and the Chemtrail Operation Cloverleaf projects.
The IMF would never, ever try to alter the weather or there could never be speculation tied to weather by powerful, interested parties.
And a carbon tax is what everyone wants in increased food and fuel prices.
Just ask the psychopath who is promoting this farce.

error

Joanne Nova holds a Bachelor of Science degree in microbiology from the University of Western Australia. She also has a Graduate Certificate in Science Communications from the Australian National University.

After graduation, Nova joined the Shell Questacon Science Circus, a Shell-sponsored program.

Nova was a speaker at the Heartland Institute.

ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Heartland Institute
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41


Joanne Nova has not published any research in peer-reviewed journals.



http://www.realclimate.org/wiki/index.php?title=Joanne_Nova

Debunking the 'Skeptics Handbook': More CO2 Does Worsen Climate Change
http://www.desmogblog.com/skeptics-handbook-carbon-dioxide-climate-change

Debunking Joanne Nova's 'Skeptics Handbook' part 2: Yes, Global Warming is Real and it's Still Happening
http://www.desmogblog.com/debunking-joanne-nova-climate-skeptics-handbook-global-warming-real-and-happening

Debunking Joanne Nova's 'Skeptics Handbook' part 3: The Climate Models Have it Right
http://www.desmogblog.com/debunking-joanne-nova-climate-skeptics-handbook-part-3-climate-models-have-it-right

Skeptics Handbook - Not Novel, Not Right
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/12/skeptics_handbook_not_novel_no.php

EDITORIAL: A climate of fraud - Washington Times
The latest release of 5,000 emails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) reconfirms what the 2009's "Climategate" files established: Global warming is more fiction than science.
washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/29/a-climate-of-fraud/

Climate change 'fraud' | UK News | Express.co.uk - Home of ...
THE scientific consensus that mankind has caused climate change was rocked yesterday as a leading academic called it a "load of hot air underpinned by fraud". Professor Ian Plimer condemned the climate change lobby as "climate comrades" keeping the "gravy train" going.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/143573/Climate-change-fraud-

What isn't a fraud is the HAARP weather project and Operation Cloverleaf ( chemtrails )

a geology professor and expert mineralogist with no background in climate science

http://www.realclimate.org/wiki/index.php?title=Ian_Plimer


Definitive Rebuttal

Ian Plimer’s ‘Heaven + Earth’ — Checking the Claims
http://www.complex.org.au/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=91


Other Rebuttals

http://bravenewclimate.com/2009/04/23/ian-plimer-heaven-and-earth/

The science is missing from Ian Plimer's "Heaven and Earth
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/04/the_science_is_missing_from_ia.php


The ‘Plimer view’ vs reality: a good lesson for climate change sceptics
http://www.climateshifts.org/?p=1453

Detailed rebuttal:
http://www.australiancoralreefsociety.org/pdf/Plimer_Detailed.pdf


RAPID ROUNDUP: New book by Ian Plimer doubts human-induced climate change – experts respond.
Australian Science Media Centre, Apr 21, 2009 (with updates)
http://www.aussmc.org.au/IanPlimerclimatebook.php


Denialist ark a wobbly craft
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25433327-5015678,00.html


No science in Plimer's primer.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25433059-5003900,00.html


Comments on Heaven and Earth: Global Warming: The Missing Science, Ockhams Razor, ABC Radio
Kurt Lambeck, president of the Australian Academy of Science (audio with transcript)
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2009/2589206.htm


Plimer wants to talk science? OK, here goes.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/05/plimer-wants-to-talk-science-ok-here-goes/


Heaven + Earth - review Malcolm Walter, The Science Show, ABC Radio National, June 6, 2009 (audio with transcript)
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2009/2586947.htm


Heaven + Earth - review David Karoly, The Science Show, ABC Radio National, June 13, 2009 (audio with transcript)
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2009/2593166.htm


Spectator recycles climate rubbish published by sceptic George Monbiot, The Guardian, 9 July 2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/jul/09/george-monbiot-ian-plimer


The Spectator is hot for global warming denial Alex Higgins, Huffington Post, 13 July 2009
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alex-higgins/the-ispectatori-is-hot-fo_b_230873.html


Silenced Plimer somehow appears on TV, on radio, in newspapers. A lot.
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/11/silenced_plimer_somehow_appear.php

Spot the recycled denial III – Prof Ian Plimer
http://bravenewclimate.com/2008/09/01/spot-the-recycled-denial-iii-–-prof-ian-plimer/

error

ha...
like I said, back to inane graphics again.
Such a solid argument in the face of overwhelming evidence pointing to the fraud of 'global warming' and the avoidance of the operational HAARP and Chemtrail programs anyone who looks outside can see for themselves.
But when you have nothing left, you go for stupid.
way to go.
Shut down these dangerous technologies before they destroy our Earth while the carbon nazis wank about CO2 for their own financial interests on behalf of the IMF and the carbon and weather speculation assholes.

exxon, coal, shell, exxon, coal mining

nice lineup of "overwhelming evidence" you've got there

chant after me

haarp cloverleaf
haarp cloverleaf
haarp cloverleaf

there all better now ;)

as soon as the propaganda stops about 'global warming' and they shut down the systems, [ HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf 'cause I'm tired of overclass assholes screwing my world as mentioned above.] I'll be okay with it.
that's enough, I'll be satisfied.

HAARP +Operation Cloverleaf
[ a good search term for the interested ]

Meanwhile these assholes are freaking the weather for extortion purposes as psychos like 'Hex' jump and hump for a carbon tax based on fraud.
We can always count on this psycho who was the denialist in charge for global DU contamination some time ago...
And proven to be another psycho trying to cover it up.
Just like now.
What do they do when they need an obsessive denialist psycho?
They call on psychoboy.

DU contamination

um, have you measured any ?

I've done measurements, and found some virgin uranium from coal power plants..

I've also compiled reports about non-depleted, and enriched uranium, plus high levels of K40 (up to 100 times natural level), found a classified NASA study that shows how K40 is produced by neutron capture in reactor coolent water, after nuclear industry shills claimed "nuclear reactors don't produce K40"

Turns out it's one of many dirty little secrets the nuclear industry hides from us.

You claim to have an alpha detector - post your measurements of DU readings - you know the 'global' contamination you claimed would happen.


re: carbon tax

I've never said one word about a carbon tax - ever.
That's a straw man entirely of your own manufacture..

IMF Carbon Tax
IMF, World Bank eye carbon tax on fuels | News.com.au
THE World Bank and IMF are proposing global carbon taxes on aviation and ship fuels in developed economies to help reduce carbon dioxide emissions, according to a draft proposal seen by AFP today.
http://www.news.com.au/business/breaking-news/imf-world-bank-eye-carbon-tax-on-fuels/story-e6frfkur-1226145207324
So we have motive.
Opportunity exists in the dark networks that guide policy originating in the centers of finance capital.
And method exists in the a fore mentioned HAARP and Chemtrail programs.