FBI
Muslims and Militancy Considerations --- Heads up By Zahir Ebrahim
A
Public Service Message from Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Ominous
clouds are hovering over the Muslims of the West as they occupy
themselves in virtuous mosque-piety behind useful idiots, false
leaders and Trojan horses, quite oblivious
to the reality around them. The best among the Muslim institutional
leadership can only come up with syntactic sugaring – and this
ranges from mosque pulpits to institutional reports to academic
pundits selling their consciences on the prayer mat and amidst
virtuous Hegelian Dialectic speeches on Islamophobia.
Our
institutional corruption spanning the gamut
from Mosques to NGOs to the Academy is so widespread that it has
become almost invisible and incognizant
like the air we breathe --- but it surrounds us no less. This
corruption isn't like what most Muslims are used to in the East. To
understand this intellectual corruption which is laden with Faustian
pacts of the soul and cradled in Machiavellian omissions to keep the
laity perpetual prisoners of the cave while the prison walls
around us continue to close-in, click on the FBI's agent-education
image below:
Caption
An FBI presentation titled “Militancy Considerations”
measures the relationship between piety and violence among the texts
of the three Abrahamic faiths [ the
god's chosen people obviously coming out on top!!! ]
As time goes on, the followers of the Torah and the Bible move from
“violent” to “non-violent.” Not so for
devotees of the Koran, whose “moderating process has not
happened.” The line representing violent behavior from devout
Muslims flatlines and continues outward, from 610 A.D. to 2010. In
other words, religious Muslims have been and always will be agents of
aggression. See Islam
vs. Secular Humanism and World Government by Zahir Ebrahim
for its full implication.
The
roots of this graph in the FBI presentation are very distinguished
and very deep-seated in doctrinal warfare. It is not merely some ad
hoc “overreaction” to the “war on terror”
against “militant Islam” by an overzealous state security
apparatus' training program to keep the Americans safe from
terrorists.
For
instance, the late Samuel Huntington of Harvard University
in his famous ode to reseeding new “doctrinal motivation”
for the on-going exercise of Anglo-Saxon hegemony over the entire
planet titled “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of
World Order”, stated:
“Some
Westerners, including [ex] President Bill Clinton, have argued that
the West does not have problems with Islam but only with violent
Islamist extremists. Fourteen hundred years of history demonstrate
otherwise .... Islam is the only civilization which has put the
survival of the West in doubt, and it has done that at least twice.”
(pg. 209)
“The
underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is
Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the
superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of
their power. The problem for Islam is not the CIA or the US
Department of Defense. It is the West, a different civilization whose
people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe
that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the
obligation to extend that culture throughout the world. These are the
basic ingredient that fuel conflict between Islam and the West.”
(pg. 217)
“The
violent nature of these shifting relationships is reflected in the
fact that 50 percent of wars involving pairs of states of different
religions between 1820 and 1929 were wars between Muslims and
Christians”. (pg. 210)
“In
1990 Bernard Lewis, a leading Western scholar of Islam, analyzed 'The
Roots of Muslim Rage,' and concluded: 'It should now be clear
that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level
of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is
no less than a clash of civilizations – that perhaps irrational
but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our
Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide
expansion of both. It is crucially important that we on our side
should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally
irrational reaction against our rival.'” (pg. 213)
That
“Judeo-Christian heritage” and
'The Roots of Muslim Rage,'
is what is captured in the FBI “Militancy Considerations”
training graph. Bernard Lewis of Princeton University further
reconstituted Huntington's self-serving statistic for the “basic
ingredient that fuel conflict between Islam and the West”
in his post 9/11 ode to defending the West against “militant
Islam” titled “Crisis of Islam – Holy War and
Unholy Terror”:
“...
But Islam, like other religions, has also known periods when it
inspired in some of its followers a mood of hatred and violence. It
is our misfortune that we have to confront part of the Muslim world
while it is going through such a period, and when most – though
by no means all - of that hatred is directed against us.” (pg.
25)
“Terrorism
requires only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by
whatever means will be effective. But in devising means to fight the
terrorist, it would surely be useful to understand the forces that
drive them.” (pg. xxxii)
That's
all that the FBI is doing – implementing Bernard Lewis'
prescription. The FBI, like all the rest of the Western states
security and war-mongering apparatuses of their vast interlocking
military-industrial-academe-media-intelligence complex, are defending
the West against the motivations outlined for them by the god's
chosen peoples:
“For
more than a thousand years, Islam provided the only universally
acceptable set of rules and principles for the regulation of public
and social life. Even during the period of maximum European
influence, in the countries ruled or dominated by European imperial
powers as well as in those that remained independent, Islamic
political notions and attitudes remained a profound and pervasive
influence. In recent years there have been many signs that these
notions and attitudes may be returning, albeit in modified form, to
their previous dominance.” (pg. 13)
But
we already knew all about that imminent threat of the Islamofascists
trying to take over the West. Since the day FBI
knocked on my door in 2003
as the bombing of Iraq was underway to protect the Americans from
Sadaam Hussein's WMDs, I knew that by first hand experience.
Which
begs the question, why make such information public? The intelligence
apparatuses will do what they are chartered
or ordered to be doing – what purpose does such an outright big
lie depicted in the FBI graph serve by making it public? Never
mind the Christian Crusades; never mind Christian Zionism and
Talmudic Zionism devastating Palestine to
Iraq; never mind the World Wars which saw Christians killing
Christians, and Christians killing Jews, all financed by the Jewish
Wall Street and the Jewish banksters controlling the Federal Reserve
Bank of the United States who sat in on the subsequent so called
Peace Conferences to harvest the loot of the Balfour
Declaration
to orchestrate the Jewish State in Palestine in the name of Torah's
god: “This country exists as the fulfillment of a promise
made by God Himself.” [1] and “It is true God
promised it to us. ... Our God is not theirs.” [2];
etceteras, who would buy into such
an outright big lie in the West today? The majority of its public who
'United We Stand' with absurdities! This includes all the Muslims who
stay silent like their Western counterparts, and labor under the same
or different misconceptions.
Those
who do not understand the psychological basis of doctrinal warfare,
fear-mongering, and uncertainty-creation as
essential ingredients of psyops and mass persuasion techniques for
creating “revolutionary times” [3] as the most
effective means of changing the lifestyle of an entire people, will
never comprehend such matters which are
driven entirely from the macro-social calculus of ushering in
one-world
government.
Unless one understands all of that, that the Hard
Road to World Order
is paved in cold blood, one can neither understand this FBI training
modality for its agents, nor the obedience
training of Americans at airports.
See the detailed Mighty
Wurlitzer Report
to comprehend its primal DNA. And read the
two short articles Convince
People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities: The
Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science
and ‘War
on Terror’ is not about ‘Islamofascism’ –
Please get with the real agenda you people!
to understand how the blossoming tree of “imperial
mobilization” is being constructed in baby steps using that
very DNA of full spectrum psychological warfare and controlled
“revolutionary times”.
Pick
up Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations, and Bernard Lewis'
Crisis of Islam, and read them both in the context and
references outlined here and the absurd FBI graph will start making
sense. Then pick up Zbigniew Brzezinski's The Grand Chessboard and
the concept of “doctrinal motivation” necessary
for “imperial mobilization” will start making
sense:
“It
is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist
democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power
is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of
a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic
well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and
the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers)
required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts.
Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.” (pgs. 35-36)
“Moreover,
as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find
it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues,
except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived
direct external threat. .... More generally, cultural change in
America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of
genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of
doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic
gratification.” (pgs. 211-212)
Compare
all that book knowledge with the empirical
reality, and Bertrand Russell's 1952 book
The Impact of Science on Society will start appearing more
self-servingly prophetic than Nostradamus:
“There
is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single
world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I
repeat, has been war; the passions that inspire a feeling of unity
are hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy,
actual or potential. It seems to follow that a world government could
only be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that
now inspires a nation to war.” (Ch. 2, pg. 37)
Muslims
today are victimized twice:
First
by the massa's “imperial mobilization” by way of
deception, by bombardment, and by “democracy” and
“revolution” infliction.
And
second, by the subversion of our own Uncle
Toms
who keep us confused and un-enlightened by their shifting amalgams
of myths, half-truths, omissions, mis-diagnosis, and red herrings.
Together
they target us by total perception
management, and thus control our behavior of full servitude by
piece-meal conditioning, eventually leading to Pavlovian compliance
to their every stimulus. Their dominant narratives is what informs
us, cajoles us, frightens us, and that's how we end up 'United We
Stand' with the Massa. If they say there is “Islamic
terrorism”, we say there is “Islamic terrorism”. If
they say 9/11 was the work of “jihadi Muslims”, if they
say there is “global warming”,
“peak oil”, “swine flu”, this and that global
disaster, this and that galactic catastrophe, we not only echo the
same, but naturally find ourselves inclined
to act in accordance to that implanted fear. If such mantras come
anointed with imposing IVY stamp of approval, the Nobel stamp of
approval, lofty academic endorsement, so much more we believe in
them, to the point that we even permit the state to molest us to keep
us safe! The theories of psychological persuasion techniques in
text-books exactly match the ground realities.
Sounds rather prosaic – but empirically true nevertheless. This
ought not to be surprising --- here is Aldous Huxley prognosticating
it in 1962 at University of California-Berkeley:
‘You
can do everything with bayonets except sit on them! If you are going
to control any population for any length of time you must have some
measure of consent. It’s exceedingly difficult to see how pure
terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly
long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an
element of persuasion. An element of getting people to consent to
what is happening to them. Well, it seems to me that the nature of
the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely
this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of
techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have
always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people
actually to love their servitude! This is the, it seems to me the
ultimate in malevolent revolution shall we say.’ — Aldous
Huxley, 1962
speech at UC Berkeley, minute 04:06
Without
our own self-study and due diligence, without skepticism to all that
is presented to us, as the targets of villainous perception
management and behavior control, we will continue to fall victim to
the Uncle Toms who control all our institutions on behalf of the
massa.
We
have to by-pass our holy and pious chieftains and their institutions
and become self-reliant both intellectually and physically, that
means in thought as well as in lifestyle away from our pontiffs and
chieftains, or else we shall continually be
sold down the drain in the guise of their being our illumined
“benefactors” and “peace-makers”. Holy Qur'an
verse 2:11 even bears witness to that timeless empiricism --- but
Plato predates it in his prescient similitude Myth of the Cave
in The Republic by one thousand years!
Empowering
the individual with deep knowledge in overarching contexts to instill
deep system insights into the calculus of hegemony, is the
only antidote for this full spectrum assault on the human mind which
employs sophisticated psychological persuasion techniques of behavior
control from cognitive to subliminal. We cannot lay out the parts
like a motor mechanic and examine each one in isolation. We have to
look at the entire system and understand its overall behavior as a
function of its components and what role each plays in that overall
system dynamics.
Such
comprehension cannot be had in 15-second attention spans we have been
weaned on. And nor by sitting like stupid gullible fools in pious or
learned gatherings listening to Trojan Horses and other insipid fools
and useful idiots planted among us and in our vaunted institutions –
both religious and secular, as well in our academies and our
governments. And nor can it be acquired by the feeble minded cowards
and Uncle
Toms
who prefer to die many deaths for the pleasure of earning a good word
and a paycheck from the massa. There is no external cure for
Faustian pacts. The cure for that is solely within.
But
for the rest more inclined to use an iota of commonsense and a
modicum skepticism than stoned belief in authority to examine any
matter, this heads-up contains essential knowledge you will not be
given either at UC Berkeley, or Harvard, or Princeton, or by a
Woodrow Wilson scholar or a Nobel laureate,
or by the mercenaries and stooges heading CAIR or MCA, or ISNA, ICNA,
AMA, CIA, ISI, MI6, CNN, ABC, NBC, BBC, NYT, and the myriad other
alphabet soups throughout the world under the iron grip of the Mighty
Wurlitzer.
Yet this knowledge is entirely public information, only waiting to be
read and studied as containing the master blueprints for the global
governance system being built openly. Its success lies in obscurity
by design – since no one “respectable” goes there.
Just look at the two recent reports emanating from CAIR
and American
Progress
in collaboration with University of California-Berkeley, both
belaboring the obviousness of Islamophobia like the autumn leaves,
but not disclosing to the public what is made deliberately obscure by
their criminal conspiracy of omission. None of them relate matters to
the Hard
Road to World Order...
but they will all be eagerly doing so ex post facto, and awarded
Pulitzers and other lofty intellectual
anointments for their eruditeness!
Examine
it today and not tomorrow when fait accompli of world government will
make it a moot point which boogieman was myth, and which one was
factual --- like the disclosure by the New
York Times in 2008
of the Pentagon's Message Machine that its retired Generals
diabolically led the three ring media circus to enact America's
decimation of Iraq under obvious falsehoods. That belated admission
after the NYT itself led that three ring circus did not restore to
Iraq its shattered tabula rasa with any more chutzpah than the
admission by the Iraq Study Group in 2005 that all the intelligence
on Iraq's WMDs were indeed false!
Tomorrow,
many of the myths taken as gospel truths today will similarly be
shown to be the output of the Mighty Wurlitzer's message machine with
a simple narrative “oops”! This is already presaged in
The
Report from Iron Mountain where the motivational
source for many fear-mongering modern myths can be found. Don't wait
until tomorrow when you hear it from your favorite pontiffs and nod
your head in that all-knowing state of servitude that has become the
pathetic characteristic of Muslims and all the rest of the
'untermenschen' worldwide. Evaluate these today, argue them today,
challenge your pontiffs today, disrobe and unmask them today,
understand the motivations behind their Message Machine today as the
vile mechanics for a system of global governance that is being
deceptively ushered in under different guises of fabricated
“revolutionary times”.
This system is being wrought by a people
all of whom evidently have multiple Ph.Ds.
in deception. The culprits are visible to even the most blind in the
saintly FBI graph itself.
And
ultimately, if you deem this knowledge not worthy as it still only
comes from the lowly pen of a most ordinary plebeian, and not from
your favorite pontiff, throw it away.
Thank
you.
Zahir
Ebrahim
Footnotes
[1]
Full quote: “This country exists as the fulfillment of a
promise made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to
account for its legitimacy.” -- Golda Meir, Le Monde, 15
October 1971 (source)
[2]
Full quote: “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign
an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country.
It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them?
Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis,
Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing:
we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept
that?” -- David Ben Gurion – Quoted by Nahum Goldmann
in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox) (source)
[3]
Full quote: “What is inconceivable
in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this
time the opportunity is missed and what is possible at such great
hours is not carried out – a whole world is lost” --
David Ben Gurion (source)
Source
URL:
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/09/fbi-muslims-and-militancy.html
Alternate
URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/09/fbi-muslims-and-militancy.html
Mirror
URL:
http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/fbi-muslims-and-militancy-considerations-heads-up-by-zahir-ebrahim/
Source
PDF:
http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/fbi-muslims-and-militancy-considerations-heads-up-by-zahir-ebrahim-2.pdf
FBI Muslims and Militancy
Considerations --- Heads up By Zahir Ebrahim