U.S. SUPREME COURT CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES FOLLOW ELITE CABALS CONSERVATIVE TARP $ AGENDA$

by LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS Wednesday, Oct. 06, 2010 at 1:34 PM

WIN AT ALL CO$T$ CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL ELITE POLITICS HAS INFECTED OUR U.S. SUPREME COURT

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS & HIS 4 LITTLE MERRY MEN ON THE U.S.SUPREME COURT OF THIS UNITED STATES> PLEASE MEET AMERICAN LEGAL SCHOLARS WHO ARE ONTO YOUR ONE SIDED MENTALITIES.

AMERICA NEEDS MANY MORE FEARLESS LEGAL SCHOLARS LIKE ERWIN CHEMERINSKY 2 SPEAK OUT ABOUT OUR ONE SIDED JOHN ROBERTS U.S. SUPREME COURT FACADE OF JUSTICE FOR ALL AMERICANS OTHER THEN THEIR POLITICAL COMRADES CABAL ...



LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS WILL CONTINUE BRINGING OUR READERS THE VERY BEST ON THE WEB WHEN IT COMES TO DEFENDING OUR MIDDLE~CLASS & POORER AMERICANS.

** THIS INFORMATIVE & INSIGHTFUL LA TIMES ARTICLE FOUND BELOW THAT WAS WRITTEN BY THE DEAN OF UC IRVINE LAW SCHOOL

(ERWIN CHEMERINSKY) IS ONE VERY SPECIAL LEGAL SCHOLARS VIEWPOINT YOU DO NOT WANT TO TAKE LIGHTLY.

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS CONTINUES TO OBSERVE CERTAIN NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL VARIOUS PIECES OF PAST & PRESENT POLITICAL DECISIONS THAT HAVE LEAD US TO THE VERY CLEAR UNDERSTANDING THAT OUR 5 CONSERVATIVE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES & THE 3 REPUBLICAN FEC MEMBERS CONSPIRED WITH GEORGE BUSH JR , KARL ROVE & A CABAL OF ELITE BILLIONAIRE WALL STREET ~ BANKERS & OTHERS TO PULL OFF THE TARP BAILOUT PONZI SCHEME THAT CERTAIN INTERNATIONAL BANKERS NOW REFER TO AS TARPGATE.

WE HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT THIS DEVIOUS CABALS FUTURE AGENDA IN OVER~TURNING FUTURE GAY MARRIAGE & ABORTION RIGHTS USING OUR OWN little American taxpayers TARP BAILOUT $$ THAT ARE BEING GIVEN ALL ACROSS AMERICA TO THEIR FELLOW FUTURE CONSERVATIVE ELECTIVE POLITICOS WITHIN THESE KARL ROVE SWIFT BOAT STYLE MEDIA HIT ADS.

THE PEOPLES U.S.CONGRESS HAS BEEN UNABLE TO GET CURRENT OR FUTURE CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION TO PREVENT WORLD~WIDE CORPORATIONS FROM GIVING UNLIMITED $$ WITHOUT THE AMERICAN VOTERS KNOWING WHERE THIS POLITICAL MONEY COMES FROM BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ONE REPUBLICAN WILLING TO VOTE FOR IT ???

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS BELIEVES BEYOND A SHADOW OF DOUBT THAT THIS PONZI TARP BAILOUT SCHEME , THE NEW UNLIMITED 5 CONSERVATIVE U.S. SUPREME CORPORATE POLICIAL CONTRIBUTION LAW ENACTED 1/2010 & THE SEE NO EVIL HEAR NO EVIL 3 REPUBLICAN FEC MEMBERS HAVE ALL ACTIVELY PARTICIPATED IN THIS VERY WELL PLANNED ELECTIONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION GEORGE BUSH JR~ KARL ROVE CABAL.

THIS (YEARS IN THE PLANNING) ELITE BILLIONAIRE CABAL OBVIOUSLY WANTS FUTURE FINANCIAL CONTROL OVER THOSE BEING ELECTED IN THE U.S. CONGRESS & OUR STATES ACROSS AMERICA !!!

EVEN little American voters ARE ALL SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT WELL FINANCED POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS WIN 95 % OF THE TIME..BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO TELL THE VOTERS LIES LONG ENOUGH, THOSE LIES START TO BECOME BELIEVABLE ...

WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY CARRIED MANY DIFFERENT WWW WRITERS VIEWS ON THE BUSH JR ~ KARL ROVE TARP PONZI BAILOUT THAT CAN BE READ BY ENTERING BUSH JR ~ KARL ROVE PONZI TARP BAILOUT INTO ANY WEB SEARCH ENGINE.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LA TIMES NEWSPAPER

Supreme Court's conservative majority is making its mark

The conservative justices' influence on constitutional law isn't likely to end soon, no matter who wins the White House in 2012.

By Erwin Chemerinsky

October 4, 2010

As the Supreme Court begins its new term Monday, its sixth with John G. Roberts Jr. as chief justice, the reality is that this is the most conservative court since the mid-1930s. Since Richard Nixon ran for president in 1968, conservatives have sought to change constitutional law, and they have succeeded in virtually every area.

During the first years of the Roberts court, it has consistently ruled in favor of corporate power, such as in holding that corporations have the 1st Amendment right to spend unlimited amounts in independent political campaigns. For the first time in American history, the high court has struck down laws regulating firearms as violations of the 2nd Amendment and held that the Constitution protects a right of individuals to possess guns. It has dramatically cut back on the rights of criminal defendants, especially as to the exclusion of evidence gained through illegal searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment and the protections of the 5th Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination. It has greatly limited the ability of the government to formulate remedies for the segregation of public schools. It has significantly expanded the power of the government to regulate abortions.

As always, the composition of the court is a product of historical accident and presidential elections. From 1968 to 2009, there were only two Democratic appointees to the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, in part because President Carter is one of the few presidents who did not get to fill a vacancy. Republican Presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan and both Bushes had a total of 12 vacancies to fill, and their picks included four staunch conservatives who are now on the court: Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

On the issues that today define the ideological continuum, these four justices are as conservative as any in American history. Their views are best understood far more by reading the 2008 Republican Party platform than by studying the views of the Constitution's framers.

If the court is split 5 to 4, as it often is in the most high-profile and important cases, these four justices can usually count on being joined by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy. Last term, for example, there were 12 cases in which Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito were on one side, with Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor on the other. Kennedy sided with the conservatives in nine of these cases and with the liberals in only three. Similarly, the year before, there were 16 decisions that were split 5 to 4 along ideological lines, and Kennedy sided with the conservatives in 11 and with the liberals in five. During the five years of the Roberts court, Kennedy has been with the conservatives more than twice as often as with the liberals in ideologically split 5-4 decisions.

It is easy to lose sight of how successful conservatives have been in changing constitutional law. Each individual decision only gradually changes the law. Conservatives have not prevailed in every decision of the Roberts court. In some areas, the conservative agenda hasn't succeeded: It has not overruled Roe vs. Wade or declared all affirmative action to be unconstitutional. But it is wrong to generalize from these areas and to miss the overall conservative impact on constitutional law.

There is no reason to think that this term will be any different as the court considers major issues concerning the separation of church and state, the ability of states to regulate immigration and the rights of criminal defendants. And in the following term or two, the court will be asked to consider major issues such as the constitutionality of the federal healthcare bill, the ban on marriage equality for gays and lesbians, and Arizona's law requiring state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws. The healthcare litigation, which is now pending in federal District Courts, will provide the best sense of whether this court will return us to the 1930s, when five conservative justices struck down many federal laws adopted as part of the New Deal.

The court's conservative majority could last another decade no matter who wins the White House in the next presidential elections. Absent unforeseen circumstances, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Scalia and Kennedy will likely be on the court beyond when President Obama leaves office, even if he is a two-term president.

It is a court for conservatives to rejoice over and liberals to bemoan. And it is likely to stay that way for years to come.

Erwin Chemerinsky is dean of the UC Irvine School of Law and the author of the forthcoming book, "The Conservative Assault on the Constitution."

Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS A INDEPENDENT VOLUNTEER WWW LOBBY THAT SINGS OUT FOR OUR AMERICAN MIDDLE~CLASS & POORER WORKING AMERICANS LIVING IN OUR WEALTHY ELITE'S COUNTRY.

* WE CAN BE FOUND WITH ANY WEB SEARCH ENGINE BY OUR NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER OR E MAIL ADDRESS.

** GOOGLE, YAHOO, AOL, MSN, BING..ETC.. ALL CARRY OUR PREVIOUS WRITTEN COMMENTARY STUFF IN VARIOUS DIFFERENT LISTINGS.

lawyersforpooreramericans@gmail.com

lawyersforpooramericans@yahoo.com

424-247-2013





Original: U.S. SUPREME COURT CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES FOLLOW ELITE CABALS CONSERVATIVE TARP $ AGENDA$