Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Where Did Government Put Your NSA-Wiretapped Phone, Fax and Private Email Communications?

by Dan Scott Sunday, Mar. 15, 2009 at 8:25 PM

Police too easily can take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or asset forfeiture.

In 2008 Telecoms were granted government immunity after they helped U.S. Government spy on millions of Americans’ electronic communications. Since, Government has not disclosed what happened to NSA’s millions of collected emails, faxes and phone call information that belong to U.S. Citizens? Could those wiretaps perhaps illegal, become a problem for some Americans? Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what NSA electronic surveillance could be used by police or introduced into court by Government to prosecute Citizens.

In 2004, former Attorney General John Ashcroft asked government prosecutors to review thousands of old intelligence files including wiretaps to retrieve information prosecutors could use in “ordinary” criminal prosecutions. That was shortly after a court case lowered a barrier that previously blocked prosecutors from using illegal-wire tap evidence in Justice Dept. “intelligence files” to prosecute ordinary crimes. It would appear this information, could also be used by government to prosecute civil asset forfeitures.

See: http://www.securityfocus.com/news/5452



Considering this court case, it might be possible for NSA to share its “recent” electronic-domestic-spying with countless U.S. police agencies; including contracted-companies and private individuals that have government clearances to facilitate forfeiting Americans’ property—to keep part of the bounty. Police too easily can take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or asset forfeiture: Under federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to take their property.

IN 2000, Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed and effectively eliminated the statue of limitations for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture, i.e., the statute runs five years from when police allege they learned an asset became subject to civil asset forfeiture. It is problematic law enforcement agencies and private government contractors will want access to more recent telecom/NSA wiretaps to secure evidence to go back perhaps decades to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances and business under Title 18 of the United States Code. Of obvious concern, what happens to fair justice in America if police become dependent on “Asset Forfeiture” to help pay their salaries?

Patriot Act Retroactive Asset Forfeiture Provisions: Under the USA Patriot Act, witnesses can be kept hidden while being paid part of the assets they cause to be forfeited. The Patriot Act specifically mentions provisions in Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 "The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000." The bill included "retroactive asset forfeiture provisions" that apply retroactively to “assets already subject to government forfeiture”, meaning "property already tainted by crime" provided “the property” was already part of or “later connected” to a criminal investigation in progress" when HR.1658 passed.

To help protect Americans from police forfeiture abuse, Congress should pass legislation that raises the standard of evidence Government uses for Civil Asset Forfeiture from a mere “Preponderance of Evidence”, to “Clear and Convincing Evidence.”

Report this post as:

Mercenary/Security Companies Involved in “Asset Forfeiture” from U.S. Citizens?

by Ross Wolf Friday, Mar. 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Mercenary/Security Companies Involved in “Asset Forfeiture” from U.S. Citizens?

Some U.S. mercenary and security corporations have greatly expanded into intelligence gathering. Consequently there might be more money made by private army/security corporations participating in "Asset Forfeitures” as a result of utilizing and sharing domestic intelligence with police, than being private soldiers. Currently some private security corporations work so closely with law enforcement that they appear to merge into one entity.

As noted in the above article: Provisions in passed HR 1658 “The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and the Patriot Act appear to have opened the door for government-contractors to get involved with the U.S. Government forfeiting billions of dollars in assets, perhaps from even American Citizens using “federal civil asset forfeiture laws.” Under civil forfeiture laws, no one need be charged with a crime for government to take their property. There are a couple hundred U.S. laws and violations included in HR. 1658 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture.”

Americans should Consider—Where Did Government Put Their NSA-Wiretapped Phone, Fax and Private Email Communications?

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy