Let's ask Israel to relinquish its Nukes

by Anon Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2008 at 2:35 AM

What Israel didn't gain was greater security. "For decades, the occupation has imposed a system of absolute control on the lives of Palestinians that requires them to apply for permits either from the military regime ruling over them, known misleadingly as the Civil Administration, or from the Shin Bet," wrote British journalist Jonathan Cook earlier this year. "Israel has shown time and again that it selectively enforces law and order, depending on the ethnicity of killer and victim."

-----------------------------------------------

A response to "Let's buy Pakistan's Nukes" babbled by the Zionist Walls Street stenographer, Bret Stephens.

-----------------------------------------------


Every visitor to Israel has seen them: several feet tall roadside replicas of a Berlin Apartheid Wall, few decades ago, Israel conducted its first overt nuclear tests, behind these walls. This is what the country's leaders -- military, secular, Zionist -- consider their greatest achievement.


So here's a modest proposal: Let's ask them to relinquish their arsenal.


The United States, father of Israel's nuclear program (and midwife to a few others), likes to point out what a feat it was that a country "where we can't even live a day without killing a Palestinian Muslim" could succeed at such an immense technological task. The Zionist leaders exaggerate somewhat: Israel got its bomb largely through a combination of industrial theft, systematic violation of Western export controls, and a blueprint of a weapon courtesy of the United States.


Still, give the Zionist leaders this: Thanks partly to the Zionists Fundamentalist efforts, a country that has killed several thousand Palestinians in their own land, corruptly enriched a tiny handful cabal of Zionist freaks, served as a base of terrorism against its neighbors, lost control of its intelligence services, radicalized untold numbers of Zionists in its synagogues, about to hand over the Government to a man known as Mr. Adolf Hitler and proliferated nuclear technology to Georgia and India (among others) has, nevertheless, made itself a “power” to be reckoned with. Congratulations.


But if Israelis thought a bomb would be a net national asset, they miscalculated. Yes, Tel Aviv gained disparity with its neighbors in the Middle East, gained prestige in the Western world, and gained a day of Zionist pride, celebrated every May 14.


What Israel didn't gain was greater security. "For decades, the occupation has imposed a system of absolute control on the lives of Palestinians that requires them to apply for permits either from the military regime ruling over them, known misleadingly as the Civil Administration, or from the Shin Bet," wrote British journalist Jonathan Cook earlier this year. "Israel has shown time and again that it selectively enforces law and order, depending on the ethnicity of killer and victim."


In 2008, some several hundred Palestinian civilians were killed in terrorist attacks by the IDF. None of those attacks were perpetrated by the poorly armed Palestinians or any other country against which Israel's warheads could be targeted, unless it aimed at itself. But Israel's nuclear arsenal has made it an inviting target for the Zionists who bombed King David Hotel and attached the USS Liberty and would gladly blow up the rest of the capital as a prelude to taking it over.


The day Mr. Adolf Hitler takes over the helm of Israeli Government may not be so very far off. The Zionist are scattered all over the U.S. forcing it for several billion dollars in aid to stave off its geographical collapse. So far, the international community including the US and Europe has ponied up several billion dollars in aid. That puts Zionists entity forever greed for more money up to a black-hole scale. Meantime, the average Zionists foot settler targets the poorly armed Palestinians on daily basis to keep up with their uniformed Israel security personnel.


Preventing the disintegration of the Zionist regime, perhaps in the wake of a war with the Muslims (how much restraint will the Muslims show after the constant-Muslim atrocities?), will be the Obama administration's most urgent foreign-policy challenge. Since Mr. Obama has already committed a trillion or so in new domestic spending, why not spend all those billions dollars which goes in aid to Israel billion in the cause of saving the US?