ANATOMY OF A CRISIS

By Philipp Hersel

[This article published in: Attac Rundbrief 2/2008 is translated from the German on the World Wide Web. Philipp Hersel is a member of the Attac study group on financial markets.]




In March 2006 what everyone predicted many years ago really happened: the prices of homes in the US stopped climbing. This was good news, particularly for those needing living space. Like elsewhere, houses in the US are partly bought on credit. Until March 2006, everything seemed normal.

The problem is that a large part of US real estate financing, the so-called “subprime” market for real estate credits to poor borrowers, functioned according to the model of a chain letter. One bought a house and after a few years when the first interests and service charges were due, either the borrower became insolvent or the bank could auction off the house and recover interests and service charges on account of the higher house price. In this case, the banks do good business and the poor live on the edge and lose their meager savings.

Since July 2007, a “crisis” has developed out of this sad daily routine because low-income homeowners are not the only losers. The banks that gave these real estate credits and then resold them are also stricken. For the banks, the “special investment vehicles” or “conduits” had the advantage over subsidiaries of not appearing on the balance sheets of the mother companies. In these conduits, good credits and “subprime” real estate credits were thrown together as in a great basket. To enable banks to buy these credits, the conduits lent money to capital investors through short-term securities (with other banks, insurances and investment funds who bought these securities). The interests and service charges of these capital investors should be paid with the interests and service charges of homeowners. The margin was the profit of the conduits.

In beautiful weather, this was a roaring business. But when many homeowners could not pay any more, the conduits broke down and fell to credit lines they would have received earlier from their mother banks. As the crisis advanced, these credits of the mother banks would clearly never be repaid because most conduits were insolvent, at least short- and intermediate-term conduits. At the same time the securities of the conduits became worthless because no one knew which good or bad real estate credits were paid into the respective basket. Perhaps the homeowners would repay some time or other in ten or twenty years.

No one knows what risky credits are hidden in what cellar. Because no bank knows this, one bank does not trust other banks any more. What is praised in textbooks as “risk control” (glossing over the facts) has functioned so perfectly that no one knows any more how the risk will be paid…

A “systemic financial crisis” exists if no trust prevails any more between the central actors on the financial markets. Banks do not lend money any more because of mistrust to one another so the money stays in their cellars. This is also true for insurances, investment funds etc. Still other banks want to give money to producing businesses. To close the gaps, central bankers in the last months have pumped hundreds of billions of dollars and euros into the financial system, in other words to expand the money supply. No infection danger went along with that expansion as long as only “dormant” cash in the cellars of banks, insurances and funds was involved.

In the meantime, trust is so shaken that bankers like Deutsche bank Josef Ackermann cry for the state. The state should now help the financial industry after decades of lobby work for deregulation.

Now it is time to turn back the wheel of regulation. For example, conduits must be prohibited and risky real estate credits renounced. At the same time possible political actions countering crises must be expanded. Capital movements must be documented and controlled internationally. As a by-product, tracking down tax evaders would be easier. In addition, we need a cooperative international currency system for example in the sense of targeted zones. So exchange rate fluctuations of dollars and euros can be limited politically.

All this only combats symptoms. As long as the wealth of this world is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, the pressure of this concentrated capital remains and is exploited globally on financial markets. Therefore radical redistribution, nationally and internationally, is the command of the hour. .



RELATED INTERVIEW AND ARTICLE:

“The Financial Crisis of 2008” by Noam Chomsky

http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticlePrint/19111

“Moment of Truth” by Paul Krugman

http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=16847343

This is a question for the ones who are trying to spin this global crisis into a 'real estate' default from duped, low or moderate income home owner hopefuls.

If the American real estate default is around one hundred billion dollars, why have recent bailouts totaled over a *trillion* [ a thousand billion ] dollars without one cent spent on nationalizing or 'bailing out' these suposed 'reasons' for the current crisis?

The real reasons involve corporate control of a government which passed agreements that dismantled our industrial base, deliberately triggered the inflation or devaluation of our remaining savings or wages through Greenspan's and his ilk, as they pushed deregulation and began looting in ernest, creating phony capital, bribing congress to allow the stealing of resourses from the general welfare [ the term is in the Decleration of Independence so get over it, fascists ! ] through Pentagon insider theft [ on 10 Sept 2001, Dan Rather reported that the Pentagon had 'lost' at least 1.3 trillion from its inventory ] from our treasury; for wars and enemies they themselves have created.

The real reasons for this crisis in a financial frame are *derivatives* or fictive speculation of unregulated imaginary 'capital'. That's where all the money is going.

Into a black hole of over a *thousand trillion* in such capital.

enjoy.

It's criminal insider theft.