imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

"Just Say No!" to the Robin Hood-in-Reverse Bailout

by CounterPunch (reposted) Wednesday, Oct. 01, 2008 at 8:26 AM

How people can stand up to threats on the economy by Wall Street banking/securities corporations, where are alternatives to save the economy that don't involve theft of taxpayer dollars??



Why are conservative Republican’s speaking the truth about this Wall Street fiasco but our Democratic leadership acts like sheep herding the flock to the wolves? I was outraged when during the recent debate Senator Obama pegged the war in Iraq at costing us 0 billion and complained how THAT had dangerously sapped our national strength, but then went on to mutter his way through support for a TRILLION raid on our national treasure by Wall Street greed mongers. Obama, Pelosi and Reed are about to hand out to Wall Street and Bush and Company the same unfathomable amount of money we just squandered in Iraq? Holy crap, Batman! I thought. We’d better do something.

If this crisis is so profound why have the Dems not floated a single serious alternate proposal? Where are their thinking caps? Are they so in bed with the rich they can’t see the evil in this deal? Don’t they have the stomach to stand up to Wall Street’s threats? Or are they merely being arrogant? (“Can’t give the people options, they will get confused.”) And where are the Trumps, the Gates, and the Walton’s with their billions and billions? Where is all the cash the Wall Street execs and their minions have pilfered? Why isn’t that being offered up to solve this problem?

Here’s a news flash: if Wall Street is REALLY in such dire straits the rich have the money to bail themselves out. I have met the rich and they can give up a house or five or ten, a private jet or two, a yacht here or there, easier than you can afford this. McCain alone could put up the first 0 million and still have million left over. Why aren’t the rich volunteering to “help” Wall Street avert the alleged calamity we are facing? Because they didn’t get rich by paying their fair share or helping others, they got rich by making OTHER people pay.

So just what is going on and what should we do about? Hell, even me sitting here in Traverse City, Michigan can come up with a few options beginning with JUST SAY NO! to this bail-out boondoggle legislation.

More;

http://counterpunch.org/gibbs09292008.html

The Power of 'No' and the Need to Keep the Pressure on Congress

by Common Dreams (reposted) Tuesday Sep 30th, 2008 7:30 AM

Incredible! This time, when the People spoke, Congress listened.

At least 228 members of the House listened. They voted early this afternoon to reject the Bush Administration's scaremongering, and the cowardly Democratic Congressional leadership's attempt at ducking and covering by attaching some meaningless verbiage to what remains a case of legalized highway robbery. At least for the moment, the bailout scam is killed.

Earlier in the day, the Congressional switchboard was jammed. You could get through, but it took a dedicated finger on the redial button of your phone. Operators at the Capitol say it's been that way for a week now, as Americans across the country have been flooding their Congressional delegations with phone calls (and emails) urging them to vote "No" on the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout.

That today was no exception, even after Democratic Party leaders (and both major party presidential candidates, John McCain and Barack Obama) had bought into the plan following their adding of some window-dressing measures designed to make it look more palatable, showed that the public is not being fooled (calls were reportedly running better than 9:1 or more like 999:1 against a bailout, perhaps more like 99:1).

People see clearly that this proposal is a trillion-dollar giveaway to the very people who have been hollowing out and destroying the US economy for over a decade or more by convincing both parties to let them do whatever they want to get rich, free of any kind of significant oversight or regulation.

As Nobelist economist Joseph Stiglitz has written of this outrageous rip-off, there are four problems facing the financial system, and the bailout proposal only addresses one--getting the toxic mortgages off the banks' books and onto taxpayers' hands. Left unsolved is the gaping hole in banks' balance sheets in the form of loans made to people and companies which cannot be repaid, which will mean they still won't start lending money again. Left unaddressed too is the continuing collapse of housing prices, which will inevitably lead to more bank collapses even after the bailout. Finally, Stiglitz says there is the general loss of faith in the financial system--a major crisis which the bailout will also not solve.

Stiglitz doesn't even address a fifth problem which is that this trillion-plus-dollar boondoggle (and when you add in the bailouts of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Bear Stearns, the multiple mega-bank failures and the pending auto-industry bailout, you're already talking .5 trillion and counting), all of it with borrowed money, the stage is being set for a collapse in the US dollar, with consequences that will reverberate through the economy. Consider: if the dollar collapses, as many experts say is almost inevitable with this kind of huge addition to the national debt, oil prices (which are set in dollars) will soar to compensate, the price of all the other goods that Americans import--more than half of everything we use in daily life thanks to the decimation of American manufacturing--will rise dramatically, and ultimately, in an effort to stem the bleeding, interest rates will have to be raised, thus bringing what's left of the economy to a grinding halt.

All of this is readily predictable--and indeed a group of over 200 prominent economists has written Congress joining Stiglitz in opposing the bailout plan--but that doesn't matter to the proponents of the bailout in Washington. What they want is to get past Election Day, and the bailout may do that, unless the public gets really aroused.

The tsunami of calls and emails to Congress, and last week's nationwide demonstrations against the bailout suggest that the public is waking up to this looming disaster and to the fact that they are being sold a bill of goods.

But it ain't over yet. We can be sure there will be arm-twisting now to try and get 12 members of Congress to change their votes and win passage in the House (the Senate, where two-thirds of the members aren't facing election for two or four years, will probably pass the bill easily). A continued expression of public outrage and of a promise of retaliation at the ballot box against those who vote for the bailout needs to be expressed.

If you haven't made an effort to call your two senators and your representative to demand that they vote "No" on this bailout, do it now (the number is 202-225-3121 or 202-224-3121), and don't give up when you get a busy signal. That's a sign that you are not alone. Just keep hitting "redial" until you get through. At that point, get the operator, before switching you, to give you direct numbers for your three members of Congress, so you can bypass the main switchboard number after that. If you did call, call again and say you don't want anyone changing their vote to become a bailout backer.

Unlike the 2002 rush to war against Iraq, we've shown that this latest bum's rush can still be stopped. We did stop it.

To make your next call more impactful, make sure you tell each member of your congressional delegation that any yes vote on the bailout means you will vote against them next election. To read about this strategy, go to:

ThrowThemAllOut.com...and then spread the word.

Keep the pressure on!

And don't forget to contact the Obama campaign too. How embarrassing for candidates Obama and McCain, who both got suckered into backing the bailout, which it is now abundantly clear the American people recognize as a ripoff.

PS: Imagine if the same kind of pressure had been brought on Congress back in October 2002 when Bush was scare-mongering Congress into approving a war against Iraq. We'd have 4500 young Americans still alive, 40,000 other young Americans would still have their limbs and other body parts. A million-plus Iraqis would still be alive. And the country would have an extra 0 billion with which to deal with the current economic crisis.

Dave Lindorff is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006). His work is available at;

http://www.thiscantbehappening.net

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/09/29-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Texas S & L bankruptcy collapse revisited

by blast from the past applies today

Tuesday Sep 30th, 2008 11:20 AM

Just wanted to remind everyone of a similar disaster from corporate criminals that happened during the 80's, the collapse of the Texas Savings and Loan and the taxpayer bailout for lost pensions. There are of course different reasons for the current bank/mortgage failures, though the corporate criminals are performing much like before. The actors in the TX S & L collapse were Micheal Milkin, Ivan Boesky and Charles Hurwitz. Both Milkin and Boesky were indicted, though Hurwitz remained free as CEO of MAXXAM Holding Inc. and went on to raid the pension of Pacific Lumber (PL) employees and engage in clearcut logging of the region's ancient redwoods..

The FDIC was supposed to investigate Hurwitz for his role in the TX S & L collapse yet were discouraged from doing so by Doolittle/Pombo who were the recipients of his lobbyist dollars. After Doolittle/Pombo derailed the FDIC from their investigation, Hurwitz and MAXXAM Inc. boasted record profits while the corporation they took over (PL) recently went bankrupt and were 80 million in debt, though MAXXAM showed profits every year since the PL takeover. This is the sort of future people will have if the current batch of banking/mortgage/securities CEOs are given the green light in the form of taxpayer bailout..



some background on TX S & L;

"The roots of the FDIC's investigation into Hurwitz and Maxxam stretch back to the mid-1980s, when the Texas financier, working with the now-defunct junk-bond firm Drexel Burnham Lambert, engaged in business dealings that involved a Texas savings and loan institution called United Savings.

After United Savings went belly-up in 1988, costing taxpayers .6 billion, the FDIC and other federal regulatory agencies started trying to figure out who should be held responsible.

While various federal agencies were poring over Hurwitz's affairs as a result of his involvement in that S&L collapse, he was counter-punching in federal court, where he filed a 1997 lawsuit against the FDIC for what amounts to bullying.

In these entwined legal battles, Hurwitz has won on most counts. Although he paid one fine of 6,000, the federal bank agencies dropped their investigations, and Hurwitz went into the appellate court Tuesday as the victim - while the FDIC had to argue that the Texas judge who sided with Hurwitz had erred in finding the federal agency a bully.

"The district court's opinion was inaccurate and unfair," FDIC lawyers argued in their brief, saying that it looked into Hurwitz's role in the S&L collapse after it had learned "that enormous financial loss (had) resulted from (Hurwitz's) wrongful acts."

"

article found @;

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2007/Hurwitz-FDIC-Fine8aug07.htm

also;

A Donor Who Had Big Allies

By Richard A. Serrano and Stephen Braun

The Los Angeles Times

Sunday 08 January 2006

"DeLay and two others helped put the brakes on a federal probe of a businessman. Evidence was published in the Congressional Record.

Washington - In a case that echoes the Jack Abramoff influence-peddling scandal, two Northern California Republican congressmen used their official positions to try to stop a federal investigation of a wealthy Texas businessman who provided them with political contributions.

Reps. John T. Doolittle and Richard W. Pombo joined forces with former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas to oppose an investigation by federal banking regulators into the affairs of Houston millionaire Charles Hurwitz, documents recently obtained by The Times show. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was seeking 0 million from Hurwitz for his role in the collapse of a Texas savings and loan that cost taxpayers .6 billion.

The investigation was ultimately dropped.

The effort to help Hurwitz began in 1999 when DeLay wrote a letter to the chairman of the FDIC denouncing the investigation of Hurwitz as a "form of harassment and deceit on the part of government employees." When the FDIC persisted, Doolittle and Pombo - both considered proteges of DeLay - used their power as members of the House Resources Committee to subpoena the agency's confidential records on the case, including details of the evidence FDIC investigators had compiled on Hurwitz.

Then, in 2001, the two congressmen inserted many of the sensitive documents into the Congressional Record, making them public and accessible to Hurwitz's lawyers, a move that FDIC officials said damaged the government's ability to pursue the banker.

The FDIC's chief spokesman characterized what Doolittle and Pombo did as "a seamy abuse of the legislative process." But soon afterward, in 2002, the FDIC dropped its case against Hurwitz, who had owned a controlling interest in the United Savings Assn. of Texas. United Savings' failure was one of the worst of the S&L debacles in the 1980s."

article found @;

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010806Y.shtml



The fear factor of the Wall Street losses of 777 (is God Allah sending U.S. a message with this special number?) points off the Dow may serve to push for a bailout plan by any means neccesary, though if people stay strong and resist the urge to cave in the to bailouts proposed by the GW bush regime something good may come out of this all. Let's not forget that people have overcome greater obstacles and there are enough locally owned credit unions that can absorb the brunt of the losses and replace the ineffective corporate chain banks and mortage/securities firms on Wall Street that are begging for billions in bailouts..

The recent losses on Wall Street may simply be threats from the banking corporations that make up the "or else..." portion of GW's warning claim that we'll need to sponsor these corporate CEOs with our tax dollars or face economic tragedy..

What was that about those missing WMDs in Iraq (or else...)? Links between Saddam and Bin Laden (based upon confessions gained from torture of senior al Queda operative Al Libby, another "or else" from GW). There was once a story about a little boy who cried "Wolf!", and after many false alarms the little boy lost his credibility with the villagers. Even if the "wolf" is at our doorstep in the form of economic collapse, the villagers have lost their trust in "little boy George W." after so many other false alarms, and the negative results of falling for those false alarms.

"Hey ya'll, how 'bout follerin' me into this deep swampy quagmire and looking for WMDs!"

Let's not get caught in GW's quicksand again!!

Report this post as:

Local News

CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police M10 2:08PM

Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies M10 1:57PM

California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings) M02 1:31PM

Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico A29 4:47PM

Change Links May 2018 A27 1:40AM

Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed A26 10:37PM

GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE A12 5:39PM

lausd whistle blower A10 11:58PM

Website Upgrade A10 3:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 1:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 11:58AM

Change Links April 2018 A01 11:27AM

Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018 M31 6:57PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 7:00PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 6:38PM

Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! M19 2:02PM

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A. M16 5:40PM

Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released M15 12:34AM

Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups M06 12:10PM

After Being Told He's 'Full of Sh*t' at School Event, Mnuchin Demands UCLA Suppress Video M02 11:44AM

Resolution of the Rent Strike in Boyle Heights M01 6:28PM

What Big Brother Knows About You and What You Can Do About It M01 3:30PM

Step Up As LAPD Chief Charlie Beck Steps Down F14 2:44PM

Our House Grief Support Center Hosts 9th Annual Run For Hope, April 29 F13 12:51PM

Don’t let this LA County Probation Department overhaul proposal sit on the shelf F13 11:04AM

Echo Park Residents Sue LA Over Controversial Development F12 8:51AM

Former Signal Hill police officer pleads guilty in road-rage incident in Irvine F09 10:25PM

Calif. Police Accused of 'Collusion' With Neo-Nazis After Release of Court Documents F09 7:14PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

,000 Reward to Catch My Child's Killers M20 5:35AM

Hikikomori capitaliste M20 1:57AM

Fbi's assaults on me M18 10:16PM

Psychonaut Michael Pollan And Psychedelic Therapy M18 1:47PM

Déstabilisation, infiltration, intoxication M18 1:06AM

The Shortwave Report 05/18/18 Listen Globally! M17 4:40PM

Yıldız Tilbe Yıldızlı Şarkılar Albüm M17 3:38PM

Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi M17 3:22PM

Trump is Old King Coal.. Multiplying Harm M17 11:46AM

Hamas’s Theater of the Absurd: “Cannibals in Gaza” M17 11:41AM

Schutzstaffel le monde nazifié M17 1:42AM

2018'de Çıkan Tüm Şarkılar M16 11:28AM

Pentobarbital de sodium M14 8:43AM

Bioeconomical resilience M14 6:27AM

The Endless War M14 3:08AM

April 2018 Honduras coup update M13 9:16PM

Why Are Linux Apps So Crappy? M13 12:25PM

Hormel Slaughterhouse Blood Mist Paralyzing Workers M12 11:53AM

Le capitalisme est le crime organisé M12 2:22AM

27 Of Many Reasons To Impeach Trump's Ryan Zinke M11 2:36PM

congress on psych drugs M11 2:51AM

Brazil: Lula challenges Moro to present at least one evidence! M10 5:26PM

ACLU on police surveillance and patterns of police shootings M10 4:41PM

The Shortwave Report 05/11/18 Listen Globally! M10 4:00PM

Stephen Francis Jones’ Designs Suggests Thinking Little is the Next Big Thing M10 3:08PM

Trump Accelerating and Multiplying The Ways Animals Are Harmed M10 10:31AM

War in Syria M10 5:24AM

Numérisation des idiosyncrasies clonées M10 4:07AM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy