Joe Vialls, 14 March 2003
"According to a private scientific group in Munich, ordinary people like you and I are the ones actually responsible for the current state of affairs, i.e. we are responsible for using collective electromagnetic communication to force this massive shock wave of change at the national and international level against any invasion of Iraq. Most ironic of all, is the fact that we could not have done so without the television networks euphemistically designed by the power brokers to enslave us all."
As America, Britain and Australia complain bitterly about French and Russian threats to use Security Council Veto powers to prevent their upcoming planned massed murder in Iraq, it seems timely to point out just how many times the real terrorists next door to Iraq have been protected by America.
Since the sixties, Israeli Jews have ruthlessly raped, butchered and murdered their way through large chunks of Palestine and the Lebanon; have acquired thousands of weapons of mass destruction, and openly shown their utter contempt for international law, by openly bragging about the “New Israel” planned to stretch eastwards to the Euphrates and thus encompass Iraq’s oilfields.
Because of immunity from international prosecution afforded by perpetual American vetos at the United Nations Security Council, Israeli Jewish terrorists have become emboldened in their attacks, to the point where their excesses have sickened most of the civilized world.
Just two weeks ago these terrorist thugs decided to “make an example” of an unarmed pregnant Palestinian woman, wife of a “suspected Palestinian terrorist”, and did so by firing 14 [yes, FOURTEEN] 120-mm high explosive tank gun shells at her home in Gaza. Predictably the house imploded on the woman and her unborn child, crushing and choking them to death as an Israeli tank commander stood by laughing, before spitting contemptuously on the street.
For the record, here is a list of those resolutions against Israel deliberately vetoed by America. Interim comments on the current situation follows at the end of the [very long] list of American vetos.
July 1973, S/10974
Vote: 13 in favor, 1 veto (US), 1 abstention.
The resolution strongly deplored Israel's occupation of the Arab territories since 1967, and expressed serious concern with the Israeli authorities' lack of cooperation with the UN Special Representative of the Secretary General.
January 1976, S/11940
Vote: 9 in favor, 1 veto (US), 3 abstentions
.
The resolution called for Israeli withdrawal from the occupied Arab territories since 1967, and deplored Israel's refusal to implement relevant UN resolutions. It furthermore reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian people to self determination, and the right of return for Palestinian refugees.
March 1976, S/12022
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
In the draft, the Security Council expressed deep concern over Israeli measures to change the character of the occupied territories, in particular Jerusalem, the establishment of Israeli settlements, human rights violations, and called for an end of such measures.
June 1976, S/12119
Vote: 10 in favor, 1 veto (US), 4 abstentions.
The resolution affirmed the right of the Palestinian people to self determination, the right of return, and the right to national independence.
April 1980, S/13911
Vote: 10 in favor, 1 veto (US), 4 abstentions.
The resolution affirmed the Palestinian right to establish an independent state, the right of return or compensation for loss of property for refugees not wishing to return, and Israeli withdrawal from the occupied Arab territories since 1967.
April 1982, S/14943
Vote: 13 in favor, 1 veto (US), 1 abstention
.
In the draft, the Security Council denounced Israeli interference with local governance in the West Bank, and its violations of the rights and liberties of the population in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The resolution furthermore called on Israel to end all activities in breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
April 1982, S/14985
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The draft strongly condemned the shooting of worshippers at Haram Al-Sharif on 11 April, 1982, and called on Israel to observe and apply the provisions of the Forth Geneva Convention, and other international laws.
June 1982, S/15185
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The resolution draft condemned the Israeli non-compliance with resolutions 508 and 509, urged the parties to comply with the Hague Convention of 1907, and restated the Security Council's demands of Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon.
June 1982, S/15255/Rev. 2
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US)
.
The resolution demanded the immediate withdrawal of Israeli and Palestinian forces from areas in and around Beirut, and that the parties would comply with resolution 508. It furthermore requested that the Secretary General would station UN military observers to supervise the ceasefire and disengagement in and around Beirut, and that the Secretary General would make proposals for the installation of a UN force to take up positions beside the Lebanese interposition force.
August 1982, S/15347/Rev. 1
Vote: 11 in favor, 1 veto (US), 3 abstentions.
The resolution strongly condemned Israel for not implementing resolutions 516 and 517, called for their immediate implementation, and decided that all UN member-states would refrain from providing Israel with weapons or other military aid until Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory.
August 1983, S/15895
Vote: 13 in favor, 1 veto (US), 1 abstention.
The resolution called upon Israel to discontinue the establishment of new settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, to dismantle existing settlements, and to adhere to the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. The resolution furthermore rejected Israeli deportations and transfers of Palestinian civilians, and condemned attacks against the Arab civilian population. The Security Council also called upon other states to refrain from giving Israel any assistance related to the settlements, and stated its intention to examine ways of securing the implementation of the resolution, in the event of Israeli non-compliance
September 1985, S/17459
Vote: 10 in favor, 1 veto (US), 4 abstentions.
The resolution draft deplored the repressive measures applied by the Israeli authorities against the Palestinian population in the occupied territories, and called upon Israel to immediately cease the use of repressive measures, including the use of curfews, deportations, and detentions.
January 1986, S/17769
Vote: 13 in favor, 1 veto (US), 1 abstention.
The resolution strongly deplored Israeli refusal to abide earlier Security Council resolutions, and called upon Israel to comply with these resolutions, as well as the norms of international law governing military occupation such as the Fourth Geneva Convention. The Security Council also expressed deep concern with violations of the sanctity of the Haram Al-Sharif, and with Israeli measures aimed at altering the character of the occupied territories, including Jerusalem.
January 1988, S/19466
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The resolution called upon Israel to accept the de jure applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Times of War to the territories occupied since 1967, and to conform to the Convention. The resolution moreover called upon Israel to refrain from practices violating the human rights of the Palestinian people.
April 1988, S/19780
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The resolution expressed grave concerned with the Israeli use of collective punishment, including house demolitions. It condemned the policies and practices utilized by the Israeli authorities violating the human rights of the Palestinian People, especially the killing and wounding of defenseless Palestinian civilians by the Israeli army. Called on Israel to abide to the Fourth Geneva Convention, and urged it to desist from deporting Palestinians.
February 1989, S/20463
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The resolution strongly deplored Israeli persistence in violating the human rights of the Palestinian people, in particular the shooting of Palestinian civilians, including children. It also deplored Israel's disregard of Security Council decisions, and called upon Israel to act in accordance with the Fourth Geneva Convention and relevant Security Council resolutions.
June 1989, S/20677
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The resolution deplored the violations of the human rights of the Palestinian people, demanded that Israel would abstain from deporting Palestinian civilians for the occupied territories, and that it would ensure the safe return of those already deported. It also called upon Israel to comply with the Fourth Geneva Convention, and requested that the Secretary General would give recommendations on measures guaranteeing compliance with the Convention, and the protection of Palestinian civilians in the occupied territories.
November 1989, S/20945/Rev. 1
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US)
.
The resolution deplored the Israeli violations of the human rights of the Palestinian people, including the siege of towns, ransacking of homes, and confiscation of property. It called upon Israel to abide to the Fourth Geneva Convention, to lift the siege, and to return confiscated property to its owners. The resolution requested that the Secretary General would conduct on-site monitoring of the situation in the occupied territories.
May 1990, S/21326
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The draft resolution attempted to establish a commission to examine the situation related to Israeli policies and practices in the occupied territories, including Jerusalem.
May 1995, S/1995/394
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The resolution confirmed that the Israeli expropriation of Palestinian land in East Jerusalem was invalid, and called upon Israel to refrain from such actions. It also expressed its support for the Middle East peace process and urged the parties to adhere to the accord agreed upon.
March 1997, S/1997/199
Vote: 14 in favor, 1 veto (US).
The resolution expressed deep concern with the Israeli plans to build new settlements in East Jerusalem, and called upon Israel to desist from measures, including the building of settlements, that would pre-empt the final status negotiations. The resolution once again called on Israel to abide by the provisions of the Geneva Convention.
March 1997, S/1997/241
Vote: 13 in favor, 1 veto (US), 1 abstention.
The resolution demanded an end to the Israeli construction of the Jabal Abu Ghneim settlement in East Jerusalem, and to all other measures related to settlements in the occupied territories.
March 2001, S/2001/270
Vote: 9 in favor, 1 veto (US), 4 abstentions.
The resolution called for a total and immediate stop of all acts of violence, provocation, and collective punishment, as well as a complete cessation of Israeli settlement activities, and an end of the closures of the occupied territories. The resolution furthermore called for the implementation of the Sharm El-Sheikh agreement, and expressed the Security Council's willingness to set up mechanisms to protect the Palestinian civilians, including the establishment of a UN observer force.
December 2001, S/2001/1199
Vote: 12 in favor, 1 veto (US) 2 abstentions.
In the resolution, the Security Council condemned all acts of terror, extrajudiciary executions, excessive use of force and destruction of properties, and demanded an end of all acts of violence, destruction and provocation. The resolution called on the parties to resume negotiations, and to implement the recommendations of the Mitchell Report. It also encouraged the establishment of a monitoring apparatus for the above mentioned implementation.
While nearly 200,000 troops stand sweating in a desert land atypically immersed in blinding sand storms stretching more than eight hundred miles, their overall masters in New York ponder what to do next. All of a sudden the complete annihilation of President Hussein and his people is not looking quite so easy as it did only a few weeks ago, and the successful theft by Israel of Iraq’s oilfields is becoming increasingly uncertain.
Put simply, America is being “sucked onto the guns” by an international coalition far greater than its own, and with thousands of years more experience in these matters. And as the spooked power brokers in New York and Tel Aviv start looking nervously over their shoulders far too late to pull back from the brink, many are starting to catch a glimpse of the faint outlines of the ghosts who were really responsible for the attack on the World Trade Center in September 2001.
New York’s plan for a “Greater Israel” stretching across the Arab oilfields and enforced by American military muscle has been an open secret for many decades, but it is an outcome that the rest of the world could not and would not allow to happen. That reality has now been made public by the deliberate premeditated ambush of America and Britain in the United Nations Security Council.
This is not merely a matter of a “recalcitrant France trying to spoil Israel’s and America’s game”, but the savage massed response of nations around the world sickened by the prospect of being eternally proxy-governed by the land of Big Mac and Coca Cola. Visibly this greater coalition includes France, Germany, Russia, China and North Korea, but there are hundreds more small nations waiting impatiently in the wings.
Ironically, according to a private scientific group in Munich, ordinary people like you and I are the ones actually responsible for the current state of affairs, i.e. we are responsible for using collective electromagnetic communication to force this massive shock wave of change at the national and international level against any invasion of Iraq. Most ironic of all, is the fact that we could not have done so without the television networks euphemistically designed by the power brokers to enslave us all.
Though I have no intention of writing a long paper on the subject, and lack the permission to do so, a few pointers do seem allowable at this precise point in history. It is a known scientific fact that the operating frequencies of the human brain are in all respects the same as the operating frequencies of Mother Earth. In other words, if you connect the electrodes of one EEG [electroencephalograph] monitor to the brain of a human being, and at the same time bury the electrodes of a second EEG in damp conductive earth six feet away from the wired human, both EEGs will show frequency patterns that are almost identical.
The fractional differences between the two EEG monitors represent microscopic inputs and outputs from the earth to the human and vice versa, i.e. direct electromagnetic interaction also known as communication. The group in Munich refers to this interaction as “Tesla Mandelbrot Micro Resonance” [TMMR], roughly translated as constant global communication regardless of individual unit signal strength.
No matter whether you use a fancy name or not, this communication goes on every second of the day between the earth and every living mammal. Indeed, without this constant electromagnetic communication we would all die instantly. Local examples of this electromagnetic communication include the “feeling” that someone behind you is staring at you [when they actually are!], and non-specific feelings of unease when close by [unseen] emergencies scenarios including road, rail or air crashes.
Until the advent of instant televised communications, 99% of this interaction was strictly local, mostly because of extremely low individual unit [human] signal strength. Even an acutely anxious human radiating intense fear is incapable of making a noticeable impact much beyond one hundred feet from where he or she is standing. But as I said, that was before we all acquired television sets and media “personalities” whose job it is to tell us what to think about, and even how to think it. These media “personalities” were originally intended to be our local controllers, theoretically capable of holding us all in check by use of judicious half truths and outright lies.
For many years this contrived system actually worked quite well, because television was in its infancy, the science of neuro linguistics had not yet been invented, and the really heavy stuff had not yet started. But even then system had an unseen fatal flaw. The power brokers seriously believed that ordinary people could be forced to “love war” or “hate Muslims” simply by television manipulation, when nothing could be further from the truth.
Roughly one-half of the television viewing public are women, all of whom are nurturers by birth and by nature, who simply cannot be talked into “loving war” at any price by a good looking stud on television. And while the other half of the population, males, are accepted as latently aggressive, they are normally only aggressive in a highly specific way. From the dawn of time males have protected their own individual family unit against all others for reasons of simple survival and procreation, but not much beyond that. An uninvited intruding bachelor getting a bit too close to the male’s wife or daughter could reasonably expect to have his brains beaten out with a club, but that was about the limit of normal male aggression.
Over the years humans have been slowly manipulated and bullied by politicians and other self-appointed leaders into fighting for the “extended family”, i.e. a country with a flag, but subconsciously very few accept this as being valid at the personal level. Yes of course you can put your hand on your heart and swear that America is the greatest place on earth, but all the time your eyes reveal the inner truth of culturally isolated ghettos, street gangs, lying politicians and greedy banks. So after going through the shallow ritual of visible allegiance to the flag each morning, most humans subconsciously revert within seconds to protecting only that which concerns them directly – their immediate family.
The essential truth is that only mentally disturbed people, mostly megalomaniacs and psychotics, have long-term wet dreams about territorial conquest, rape, pillage and all of the other horrors that seriously deranged humans appear to enjoy. But in its incredible stupidity, the media assumed that ordinary humans could be taught to enjoy this obscene behavior, and flooded the television screens with it, most notably since the Israelis started butchering truly vast numbers of Palestinians two years ago. But instead of being pleased by this continual display of Israeli perversion and barbarism, ordinary people became angry instead, and anger has a precise electromagnetic frequency, correct to three decimal places.
Despite the best efforts of the chosen media “personalities” to assure viewers that the daily obscenities they were watching in Jenin refugee camp and other places was “justified” and really “only self defense”, public anger mounted across the globe, and that massed anger started to have a cumulative global effect under the precise protocols of TMMR. In isolation, a single angry human can only feed a few nano volts of electromagnetic energy or communication back into the global communications system, but after a year of Israeli atrocities there were tens of thousands, and then hundreds of thousands of people pumping energy back through the earth on the precise electromagnetic frequency of anger.
Nano volts of anger became micro volts, which then became milli volts, which then became volts and eventually tens of volts of pure concentrated anger across the entire globe. This anger, fed and driven directly by television images of Zionists wantonly butchering unarmed Muslims then became self-sustaining. Hundreds of thousands turned into millions, who poured onto the streets of capital cities around the world to try and stop the madness, by now clearly identified subliminally as any and all attacks by America and Israel on Muslims in the Middle East and elsewhere.
The power brokers were beside themselves with rage. How could simple human cattle revolt so strongly after they, the self-appointed leaders, had invested so heavily in television control?
Now, today perhaps, these megalomaniacs are just starting to realize that the sole reason is simple mind control. Not the government-controlled version of “mind control” so feared by conspiracy theorists world wide, but the spontaneous communication of millions of angry humans across the globe who now share a common objective.
Put bluntly, the Zionists have very little time left. If Iraq is attacked as planned, and large numbers of women and children die as confidently predicted, millions of angry people will turn into an absolutely unstoppable mass of tens or even hundreds of millions. No civil authority will be able to stop them, and the military will be kept in barracks for their own safety, with strict orders not to fire on civilians unless the latter violate military bases.
There will be no need for the largely fictional “Al Qaeda” to play any part, because Washington and New York will be stripped of their power brokers in surprisingly short order by the American people themselves. How fitting that those who tried for so long to control the masses by television, should ultimately themselves be destroyed by the very same medium.
http://www.vialls.com/wecontrolamerica/WarCrimes.html