Virginia Tech killer Cho Seung-Hui wasn't really that much different morally or ethically from George Bush or Dick Cheney. Mr.Cho Seung-Hui sought out a violent solution to his problems at Virginia Tech whereas Bush & Cheney decided on and implemented a violent solution to their greed driven (oil aquisition) problems in Iraq.

One of the major differences is that Cho Seung-Hui solution only killed 33 people while the Bush Regimes solution has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis plus several thousand US soldiers - so far. Also Cho Seung-Hui's violent rampage didn't destroy whole towns and villages and pollute the environment with toxic chemicals and depleted uraniun bombs etc.like the Bush Govt's continuing decimation in Iraq.

The American media loudly proclaims its' "Horrified" at the Virginia Tech killings but not of course at Bush's far worse slaughter in Iraq!

HIS UNHOLINESS (GEORGE WARMONGER BUSH) : "A little MK Ultra / Monarch Project on the right Pigeon and you've got your Big Bang. Then the Sheep cry for Protection and a Ban on Firearms, while they forget about Attorney Firings, Forged Niger Uranium Documents, and 9-11 being an inside job. That's the beauty of Mind Control. The Pigeon does himself after he finishes his rampage. And his Story die with him. HOOK 'EM HORNS ????????"

If this shooter in Virginia had lived his lawyers could have claimed he was insane! I wonder what defence Bush & Cheney could offer?

Lets see Lord LoxyBagel: The Bush Cheney Regime has so far blown about 800 Billion Dollars in U.S.taxpayer money on their Iraq War/Quagmire! If this money had instead been spent on the things you mentioned like "'global warming' and Dutch Elm disease and AIDS and homelessness" then it would have provided much needed assistance and solutions to those poblems and more! On the other hand Lord Lackey your support of the Bush Regime creates no such benefits for anyone!

I understand the feeling here and if I was at Virginia Tech, I would refuse to attend any ceremony in which Bush is speaking or having any involvement. Just isn't right.

Also it should be noted that the people at the SOS forums immediately turned this into an immigration issue and I'm sure they're very disappointed that they can't blame this on illegal immigration.

Outside of Dubya Bush being undoubtably the pre-eminent scholar-leader of the modern era the only other point I can affirm is that this site definitely "does not" ban or delete any commentary that disputes the holiness and sanctity of illegal immigration! Praise Jay Leno!

If anyone was thinking I was just trying to find another way to take a shot at SOS/Minutemen, I simply saw what they're saying on their forums and commented on it as a viewpoint. Many of them dislike immigration in general, which is obvious. Now at this point I find myself saying maybe they should review American history and look at how this nation was formed.