imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Should We Deny Lebanon the Right to Defend Itself?

by Jonathan Cook Wednesday, Sep. 27, 2006 at 1:33 PM

Let me finally suggest a further two questions for her. Does HRW characterise Hizbullah's return of fire as a war crime even though its undiminished ability to launch rockets was what finally brought Israel's war machine to a standstill and led to a ceasefire? And exactly how much of a war crime would the firing of those rudimentary rockets be if it turned out that not only did they halt the war but they also prevented its expansion to include Syria and Iran?

Should We Deny Lebanon the Right to Defend Itself?

Human Rights Watch: Still Missing the Point

By JONATHAN COOK

Nazareth.

In a CounterPunch article criticising Human Rights Watch for singling out Hizbullah rather than Israel for harsher condemnation of its military actions during the Lebanon war, I made sure to quote the organisation fairly and accurately before seeking to refute its arguments. Unfortunately, in her recent response HRW's Middle East policy director, Sarah Leah Whitson, did not return the favour. Possibly realising that her case was weak, she decided to paraphrase my argument instead, misrepresenting it, and only then try to rebut it.

According to Whitson, I claim to know that Hizbullah was trying to hit military rather than civilian targets in Israel during this summer's war because on several occasions its rockets actually did strike military targets. If only, for her sake, that were my argument. As she points out, it is easy to discredit such reasoning: if Hizbullah's rockets were entirely random, they might still have hit an Israeli military site or two by chance.

By misrepresenting my position, Whitson benefits in two ways. First, she is able to suggest that I am an apologist, naïve or mischievious, for Hizbullah's war crimes. I am either a dupe or a dissembler. And second, she enjoys the satisfaction of asserting that she and her organisation are facing down the extremists on both sides: apologists for Hizbullah's war crimes like me on the one hand, and the supporters of pre-emptive wars and torture like Alan Dershowitz on the other. Whitson can then smugly claim to be occupying the sensible centre.

If this is how one of the directors of HRW distorts my arguments and evidence when I carefully set out my case in black and white on the page, one has to wonder how faithfully she and her organisation sift the evidence in the far trickier cases relating to human rights, where things are rarely so black and white.

Which brings me back to my original argument. My point was not, as Whitson asserts, to claim that I knew whether Hizbullah -- or Israel -- was trying to distinguish between military and civilian targets during the war. Quite the reverse, in fact. I made it clear that I could not know what either side intended because I was not sitting alongside the Katyusha rocket teams or Israel's military intelligence officers.

I took issue with HRW precisely because it appears to believe it does know what the two sides intended, even though it was no nearer to the rocket teams or Israeli command bunkers than I was. In fact, not only does it claim to know what Hizbullah and Israel hoped to achieve in the war, HRW also feels able to conclude that Hizbullah's intentions were far more malign than Israel's and therefore produced the greater war crimes.

I am not challenging HRW's research, which appears to show unequivocally that Israel did commit major war crimes; I am contesting its distorted presentation of the facts it unearthed to suit what looks suspiciously like a political agenda. The impression is that HRW is trying to present a more damning picture of Hizbullah's actions than Israel's, despite the evidence, to avoid attracting yet more allegations of anti-Semitism from Israel's influential defenders.

It is for that very reason, of course, that Israel's apologists use the slur: to intimidate organisations like HRW. The inevitable conclusion, at least based on HRW's presentation of its findings about the Lebanon war, is that the Israel lobby is succeeding.

Let's recap on the quote from HRW's senior researcher, Peter Bouckaert, published in the New York Times, that provoked my original article:

"I mean, it's perfectly clear that Hezbollah is directly targeting civilians, and that their aim is to kill Israeli civilians. We don't accuse the Israeli army of deliberately trying to kill civilians. Our accusation, clearly stated in the report, is that the Israeli army is not taking the necessary precautions to distinguish between civilian and military targets. So, there is a difference in intent between the two sides. At the same time, they are both violating the Geneva Convention."

I hope I am not the only person discomforted by the idea that a major human rights organisation thinks it has a legitimate role divining what two sides in a war wanted to achieve rather than what they did in fact achieve, and then seeks to make judgments about war crimes based on its interpretations of such intentions.

Whitson could have distanced herself from Bouckaert's comments, saying they were unjustified, but instead she chose to defend them. Which serves only to increase my suspicions about HRW's agenda.

A responsible human rights organisation ought to be concerned with the events of the Lebanese conflict only, and then try to judge the degree to which the acts committed by both sides fell within the parameters of legitimate warfare, defined as self-defence and the protection of important national interests. War is never a moral event, but it can be conducted within certain constraints that should be the primary concern of human rights monitors.

According to the findings of Human Rights Watch, and reports in the media, we know much about what Israel actually did during the war. Its airforce massively attacked Lebanon's infrastructure, such as roads and power stations, collectively punishing the populaton; its aerial bombardments resulted in the deaths of more than 1,000 Lebanese, the overwhelming majority of them civilians; its air strikes forced hundreds of thousands of Lebanese civilians to flee their homes as villages were destroyed in the south; convoys of refugees and medical personnel, as well as a United Nations peacekeeping base, were attacked; and finally, in the last few hours of war, as the deadline for a ceasefire rapidly approached, Israel dropped hundreds of thousands of cluster bombs, tiny land mines that are maiming and killing returning refugees and will continue to do so for years to come.

On all these grounds, Israel grossly violated international law -- it committed war crimes. We need know nothing about its intentions to make this judgment. None of these forms of attack was necessary in terms of Israel's right to self-defence or its right to protect its interests: the return of the two soldiers captured by Hizbullah, the pretext for the war, and the reassertion of its sovereignty.

Given that Hizbullah immediately offered a prisoner exchange for the soldiers, in return for Lebanese prisoners of war being held in Israeli jails, it is clear that options other than the ones above were available to Israel.

So what about the facts in relation to Hizbullah? Let's examine its behaviour in the war's two main phases: Hizbullah's provocation of hostilities, and its conduct during the war.

We know that the Shiite group provoked the confrontation with Israel by launching a military operation on July 12 designed to capture Israeli soldiers under cover of a small and harmless volley of mortars and rockets fired at border posts and at the northern community of Shilo in what the Israeli army characterised at the time as "diversionary tactics". In a gunfight, three Israeli troops were killed as the two soldiers were captured.

This was presented as an act of unprovoked aggression by the Western media, which stripped the attack of its context. In truth, the military operation was the latest flare-up in long-running, if small-scale, hostilities between Israel and Hizbullah since Israel ended its two-decade occupation of south Lebanon in 2000. Those tensions have focused on a disputed corridor of land, known as the Shebaa Farms, claimed by Lebanon but held by Israel.

In addition, after withdrawing, Israel maintained and exacerbated the state of hostilities by refusing to release a handful of Lebanese PoWs, by failing to hand over maps of the hundreds of thousands of land mines it laid during the occupation, by repeatedly shooting at, and killing, Lebanese shepherds who strayed into the Shebaa Farms area, and, most significantly, by violating almost daily Lebanese sovereignty by sending warplanes and spy drones as far as Beirut.

Hizbullah's operation was not the first it had launched to capture Israeli soldiers since 2000, and its motives for wanting to do so were well known to Israel. Hizbullah immediately offered to return the soldiers in a prisoner swap.

Thus, although Hizbullah's operation may have been foolhardy, it was most certainly not a war crime under any interpretation of international law.

What about the second phase of the war, when Hizbullah began firing rockets into Israel? Again, these attacks have been stripped of their context, after much misinformation from Israel and its supporters. Hizbullah did not initiate the rocket fire, as is sometimes suggested; it retaliated after Israel began its massive bombardment of Lebanon. There was clear cause and effect, which HRW knows.

In his speeches, Hizbullah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, repeatedly stated that its rocket fire was a response to Israel's far greater attacks and would end when Israel stopped firing missiles and dropping bombs on Lebanon. When Israeli guns briefly fell silent after a US-imposed "period of calm", Hizbullah studiously observed the 48-hour lull whereas Israel quickly broke it. Each expansion of Hizbullah's range of rocket fire was preceded by a warning from Nasrallah of what was in store if Israel continued or intensified its assault.

The rocket fire, therefore, adequately fits any reasonable definition of self-defence, not just of Hizbullah's military assets but of Lebanon as a whole. Given the weakness of the Lebanese army -- the reason, after all, why Israel was able to occupy the country for so long -- Hizbullah can justifiably claim that the duty to defend Lebanon from Israeli attack fell to it by default.

So again, it is difficult to see in what way Hizbullah's conduct during the second phase of the war can be categorised as a war crime -- and even harder to understand how HRW believes it can be described as a greater war crime than Israel's assault.

But HRW believes it has one trump card up its sleeve. It says Hizbullah should never have fired any of its rockets, even in self-defence, because they were too primitive to be accurately aimed at Israeli military targets. Even if Hizbullah intended to hit military sites (and again we cannot be sure), and even if the victims of its attacks were mainly soldiers, HRW regards Hizbullah as having "deliberately targeted" civilians because whatever rockets were sent over the border would in all probability strike civilian areas.

I have previously pointed out the paradox of HRW criticising Hizbullah for killing mostly soldiers, even with its "imprecise" arsenal, more harshly than Israel, which killed mostly civilians with its smart bombs and precision missiles. I will not labour the point again.

Instead I will repeat the questions I asked last time, and which Whitson failed to answer -- presumably because, given HRW's public position, she could find no moral high ground from which to respond.

According to HRW's understanding of international law, what was Hizbullah supposed to do, given its inferior arsenal, when Israel started to wreck Lebanon, destroying its infrastructure, killing its civilian population and driving hundreds of thousands from their homes? If by firing just one of its rudimentary rockets, it was immediately committing a war crime, what military options were available to it as a response to what we have already seen was unwarranted Israeli aggression against the whole of Lebanon?

If for weeks on end Israel used its superior armoury from the air -- relying on an air force against which Hizbullah, lacking anti-aircraft guns, had no defence -- in what ways could Hizbullah engage with such warfare? Under international law, was Hizbullah required to sit tight and let the people of Lebanon die in their hundreds while it waited to see whether Israel would begin a ground invasion? Would a ground invasion have happened had Hizbullah not continued firing its rockets? And was Israel's belated attack by land the first moment Hizbullah was entitled to fight back?

The nearest to an answer Whitson supplied in her response to my original article was the following: "[T]hese constraints [provided by international law] hardly preclude a military strategy for either side should it decide to pursue one. Hezbollah has a long history of cross-border attacks on Israeli military facilities and soldiers, including the one that launched the most recent round of fighting."

What a wonderfully complete circle her argument is. Hizbullah has the right under international law to launch a cross-border attack to capture soldiers, as it did, but then what? What rights under international law does Hizbullah have if Israel chooses to destroy Lebanon in response? Whitson offers no answers.

Let me finally suggest a further two questions for her. Does HRW characterise Hizbullah's return of fire as a war crime even though its undiminished ability to launch rockets was what finally brought Israel's war machine to a standstill and led to a ceasefire? And exactly how much of a war crime would the firing of those rudimentary rockets be if it turned out that not only did they halt the war but they also prevented its expansion to include Syria and Iran?

If on this occasion Whitson can address my point, I would be interested to hear her response.

Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. He is the author of the forthcoming "Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish and Democratic State" published by Pluto Press, and available in the United States from the University of Michigan Press. His website is www.jkcook.net

Report this post as:

LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 237 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
We lov eyou Lebanon! Long live Lebanon!!!! Wednesday, Sep. 27, 2006 at 1:49 PM
There is hope for the good people of Lebanon We love you Lebanon! Wednesday, Sep. 27, 2006 at 2:04 PM
SchtarkerYid Defend Lebanon by defeating Hezbollah Wednesday, Sep. 27, 2006 at 2:22 PM
We love you Lebanon! More hope for Lebanon Wednesday, Sep. 27, 2006 at 4:38 PM
Why was this deleted? on topic, well documented, intelligent post Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 6:22 AM
Deletions outside of guidelines = censorship Becky Johnson Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 1:31 PM
Because she can't have her way Yawn...more whining from Becky Johnson Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 2:02 PM
Becky wasn't using it as a chatroom but you've been Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 2:45 PM
Why are they so slow We'll say it slowly for the zionazis Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 2:53 PM
no one is trying to turn this into a pro-Israel site But truth and accuracy are worthy goals Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 3:21 PM
Indymedia acts as a balance Indymedia is an alternative Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 3:28 PM
"Indymedia should be a forum for free speech and logical discourse" Addendum Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 3:32 PM
YAWN's Editorial Guidelines don't match those of LA.IMC Becky Johnson Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 8:14 PM
>This seems to INVITE commentary. johnk Thursday, Sep. 28, 2006 at 11:01 PM
get a room hex Friday, Sep. 29, 2006 at 3:09 AM
On deletions Not Becky Friday, Sep. 29, 2006 at 4:45 AM
By the Numbers Real Horrors Friday, Sep. 29, 2006 at 10:08 AM
And if you believe that one I have this bridge for sale.... Becky Johnson Saturday, Sep. 30, 2006 at 2:50 PM
Just wondering what is offered to female suicide bombers? Saturday, Sep. 30, 2006 at 3:00 PM
"I doubt most of them would be interested in 72 virgins" TW Saturday, Sep. 30, 2006 at 11:15 PM
Old men have ALWAYS sent young men to die for them Becky Johnson Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 4:17 AM
creating your own problems then whining about them hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 5:52 AM
On female suicide bombers Tia Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 5:53 AM
Stepping back Matt Fitt (since you like that name, Tia) Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 9:32 AM
The Horowitz Connection Becky Johnson Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 11:48 AM
conservative friends are the GREATEST ! hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 12:30 PM
Uh, SJ, you really give me too much credit Matt Fitt (since you like that name, Tia) Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 4:00 PM
The Value of Human Life Becky Johnson Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 4:40 PM
it all just fell into place hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 5:55 PM
Conservatives johnk Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 6:29 PM
Here is one example Becky Johnson Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 6:39 PM
did hex just type this? dang, wow and factor this Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 6:42 PM
re: creeps and troublemaking hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 6:44 PM
Logistics johnk Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 6:52 PM
pretty please put down that axe eugene hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 6:52 PM
going postal hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 7:01 PM
Wiley Drake johnk Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 7:13 PM
to hex johnk Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 7:31 PM
On juhnk's comparison of the Holocaust to "Palestine" edify thyself Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 7:45 PM
I see your point in that context hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 7:52 PM
to edif johnk Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 8:17 PM
to edif johnk Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 8:36 PM
to hex johnk Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 8:38 PM
I've got a little secret hex Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 9:02 PM
To johnk edify thyself Sunday, Oct. 01, 2006 at 9:13 PM
ah the master speaks and we listen Monday, Oct. 02, 2006 at 5:12 AM
Pre-meditated mass murder Becky Johnson Monday, Oct. 02, 2006 at 7:24 AM
TWiddling his brain dismissed, BS-er Tuesday, Oct. 03, 2006 at 5:25 PM
not one people Two people in one Tuesday, Oct. 03, 2006 at 5:36 PM
"we should never forget the fact that the Nazi genocide" hex Tuesday, Oct. 03, 2006 at 5:37 PM
Get emotional on us if you want to hexi-gone Tuesday, Oct. 03, 2006 at 5:53 PM
And you'll be laughed at here, as always You'll demand nothing, child Tuesday, Oct. 03, 2006 at 5:58 PM
Here's a not-unusual U.S. Native American residence TW Tuesday, Oct. 03, 2006 at 10:20 PM
One little two little three little anti-Semites Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 4:00 AM
terroristic demands, lowest denominator and generalizations hex Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 4:24 AM
bigots and racists if the shoe fits Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 5:37 AM
the euphemistic terrorist rationalizes the demands hex Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 6:13 AM
Wrong Again Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 6:23 AM
Actually Iwas replying to your twit friend CT... TW Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 11:34 AM
No, you miss the point again, Yidiot, as is your wont TW Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 11:54 AM
WHICH "weird skin color comment," Yidiot? TW Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 12:26 PM
Just curious Source for these numbers? Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 1:07 PM
Poor dhimmi Let's give the Yidiot one last review Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 1:42 PM
Oh, you mean THIS "weird skin color comment" TW Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 2:13 PM
It's Tuesday! Shabbot Sha-stupid! Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 2:17 PM
*Groan* what a BLOCKHEAD!! TW Wednesday, Oct. 04, 2006 at 10:32 PM
Jews of all colors (and everyone else too) can live in Israel Becky Johnson Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 1:38 PM
MMM Twisted Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 1:40 PM
yeah Becky - sex slaves can too hex Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 1:46 PM
SchtarkerYid same thing with American "Progresives&qu Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 1:49 PM
I'll tell you why Sheepdog Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 1:54 PM
because propaganda is propaganda hex Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 1:57 PM
SchtarkerYid you are mis-using the word Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 2:01 PM
to Cracker jerk Sheepdog Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 2:04 PM
propaganda can only exist in the absence of truth hex Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 2:05 PM
you're the one "re-educating" remember hex Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006 at 2:19 PM
Becky's selling you a sentimental bill of goods about history TW Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 2:46 AM
Becky's "re-writing" history hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 2:56 AM
SchtarkerYid lovely quote except Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 7:40 AM
Some Utopia! Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 8:03 AM
Quotas for Jews Becky Johnson Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 5:03 PM
Immigration restrictions in Awerica Remember the Johnson Act? Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 5:27 PM
Becky: "Tia's Jewish parents who tried to escape holocaust Germany" TW Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 5:38 PM
"The one that won first prize locally was about Darfur." TW Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 5:41 PM
More re: Johnson Act Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 6:36 PM
I'll take Manhattan, the Bronx and Staten Island, too. Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 6:44 PM
ethnically cleansing so who do we start with? Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 8:16 PM
another "re-education" spat hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 8:26 PM
boycotts, water, oil and vanish hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 8:45 PM
Yup, there it is TW Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 8:49 PM
"You suck at debate" hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 9:17 PM
"plays fair" - by screaming "WOMAN HATER" hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 9:41 PM
"She's a lovely human being" - great ! then love her :) hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 9:56 PM
it's all about water hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 10:07 PM
The Israel Lebanon War is all about Water hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 10:18 PM
but when you look under the barrel :) hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 3:57 AM
but what about the water ? hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 4:10 AM
"And you do suck." - well :) hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 5:30 AM
players scorecards & games hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 6:14 AM
the troll is living in neverland hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 6:55 AM
Old news is good news? Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 7:15 AM
distract, divert, dismiss, discredit and demonize hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 7:50 AM
"I've dealt with her personally. She's a lovely human being." TW Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 8:13 AM
not only that but hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 8:37 AM
well you are learning - from me :() hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 9:16 AM
gibberish fresca Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 9:42 AM
No fresca Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 9:58 AM
"I didn't say they were photoshopped" hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 10:18 AM
"by hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 2:26 PM " debate coach Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 11:35 AM
oh - the "topic" hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 11:47 AM
"by hex Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 2:47 PM " debate coach Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 11:56 AM
or Israel stealing Lebanon's water hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 12:04 PM
pretty cool hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 12:44 PM
"5 year old data" my ass hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 2:43 PM
Jordan River, Dead Sea drying up hex Saturday, Oct. 07, 2006 at 3:30 PM
Becky: "Yes, [I am Noahide]" TW Sunday, Oct. 08, 2006 at 1:27 PM
in awe and blinded Haw Haw Sunday, Oct. 08, 2006 at 3:04 PM
Holy Fuck! Hebron Baby-Stabber is a LUBAVITCHER!!!! Of course Sunday, Oct. 08, 2006 at 3:09 PM
No thanks TW Sunday, Oct. 08, 2006 at 5:36 PM
Way off the mark, as always TW Sunday, Oct. 08, 2006 at 9:15 PM
Hey Stabber TW Sunday, Oct. 08, 2006 at 10:00 PM
So you don't really read the stuff, do you Stabber? TW Sunday, Oct. 08, 2006 at 11:45 PM
David Duke, National Alliance and Rense, oh my! Tia Monday, Oct. 09, 2006 at 6:13 AM
Religion is a fairy tale for the gullable Fuck your pathetic god Monday, Oct. 09, 2006 at 7:45 AM
False arguments from Blinded Jews Religion doesn't equal spirituality Monday, Oct. 09, 2006 at 9:03 AM
did I see that correctly? Dawg Monday, Oct. 09, 2006 at 9:35 AM
Wrong? BJ has said that she is Jewish Monday, Oct. 09, 2006 at 9:40 AM
loading the thread waddling off into inanity Monday, Oct. 09, 2006 at 9:30 PM
Ever heard of H-I-S-T-O-R-Y??? TW Monday, Oct. 09, 2006 at 10:06 PM
"by debate coach Friday, Oct. 06, 2006 at 2:35 PM " there they go again Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2006 at 3:27 PM

Local News

GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE A12 5:39PM

lausd whistle blower A10 11:58PM

Website Upgrade A10 3:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 1:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 11:58AM

Change Links April 2018 A01 11:27AM

Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018 M31 6:57PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 7:00PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 6:38PM

Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! M19 2:02PM

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A. M16 5:40PM

Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released M15 12:34AM

Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups M06 12:10PM

After Being Told He's 'Full of Sh*t' at School Event, Mnuchin Demands UCLA Suppress Video M02 11:44AM

Resolution of the Rent Strike in Boyle Heights M01 6:28PM

What Big Brother Knows About You and What You Can Do About It M01 3:30PM

Step Up As LAPD Chief Charlie Beck Steps Down F14 2:44PM

Our House Grief Support Center Hosts 9th Annual Run For Hope, April 29 F13 12:51PM

Don’t let this LA County Probation Department overhaul proposal sit on the shelf F13 11:04AM

Echo Park Residents Sue LA Over Controversial Development F12 8:51AM

Former Signal Hill police officer pleads guilty in road-rage incident in Irvine F09 10:25PM

Calif. Police Accused of 'Collusion' With Neo-Nazis After Release of Court Documents F09 7:14PM

Center for the Study of Political Graphics exhibit on Police Abuse posters F07 9:50AM

City Agrees to Settle Lawsuit Claiming Pasadena Police Officer Had His Sister Falsely Arre F04 3:17PM

Professor's Study Highlights Health Risks of Urban Oil Drilling F04 12:42PM

Claims paid involving Pasadena Police Department 2014 to present F04 10:52AM

Pasadenans - get your license plate reader records from police F03 11:11PM

LA Times Homicide Report F03 1:57PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

Biodiversité ou la nature privatisée A20 11:22AM

The Market is a Universal Totalitarian Religion A20 7:14AM

Book Available about Hispanics and US Civil War by National Park Service A19 5:52PM

The Shortwave Report 04/20/18 Listen Globally! A19 4:01PM

The Republican 'Prolife' Party Is the Party of War, Execution, and Bear Cub Murder A19 11:48AM

Neurogenèse involutive A18 9:21AM

Paraphysique de la dictature étatique A16 10:13AM

Book Review: "The New Bonapartists" A16 3:45AM

The West Must Take the First Steps to Russia A14 12:25PM

Théorie générale de la révolution ou hommage à feu Mikhaïl Bakounine A14 3:30AM

The Shortwave Report 04/13/18 Listen Globally! A12 3:50PM

“Lost in a Dream” Singing Competition Winner to Be Chosen on April 15 for ,000 Prize! A12 3:48PM

The World Dependent on Central Banks A12 4:43AM

Ohio Governor Race: Dennis Kucinich & Richard Cordray Run Against Mike DeWine A11 9:40PM

March 2018 Honduras Coup Again Update A10 10:52PM

Apologie du zadisme insurrectionnel A10 3:33PM

ICE contract with license plate reader company A10 1:14PM

Palimpseste sisyphéen A09 11:23PM

Black Portraiture(S) IV: The Color of Silence...Cuba No...Cambridge Yes A09 5:32AM

Prohibiting Micro-Second Betting on the Exchanges A09 4:18AM

Prosecutors treat Muslims harsher than non-Muslims for the same crimes A08 10:33PM

Amy Goodman interview on cell phone safety A08 10:29PM

Mesa, Arizona police officer kills unarmed white man A08 9:50PM

Israeli leaders should be prosecuted for war crimes A08 9:48PM

Paraphysique de l'autorité A08 12:11AM

Two Podcasts on fbi corruption A06 10:13PM

Fbi assassins assault & try to kill DAVID ATKINS A06 7:29PM

EPA Head Scott Pruitt: Of Cages And Sirens A06 2:15PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy