Islamic nations goaded into position to be attacked again. Will terror provocations be used to invoke police state? What price will be exacted for centuries of ignoring how war pretexts are fabricated? Late-breaking and long-term developments in Iran, Palestine and the United States seem to point to a present risk of catastrophic nuclear war.
I've never been the Chicken Little type to panic about things like Y2K, yet I seem to see deadly deadlines drawn in the sand now.
Take the following mixture. Will it explode?
1. Iran elects extremist leader Ahmedinajad who drops a triple gauntlet: denying Israel's right to exist, taking the seals off the nuclear genie, and opening an oil market in euros to undercut the dominance of the beleaguered American dollar.
2. Palestine elects Hamas, just as hardline on the illegality of the Zionist project, and committed by charter to an Islamic state over the entire territory of Palestine.
3. Sharon in a coma, next war criminal Netanyahu in the wings, Israelis are itching for a nuclear attack on Iran.
4. Russia on the verge of selling modern anti-aircraft missiles to Iran that might protect it from US bombers, but may pull back now because of the nuclear issue. Russia unveils its Topol missile that can penetrate any US anti-missile defense for the foreseeable future.
5. The world's presiding figurehead George Bush is a scion of the arch-fascist dynasty that launched Adolf Hitler. Last time his poll ratings suffered, he was saved by 9/11 terror and wars of aggression. He delivers a State of the Union message on January 31.
6. Bin Laden's ghostly voice breaks a long silence to endorse the doctrine of justified revenge against the empire.
7. Rumors swirl on the Internet that the faction inside the US milinplex that scenarized 9/11 will fake a nuke attack on a US city this week, under cover of an anti-terror drill.
Does it all fit together? Big or little chicken, to me it does, yes. All these are aspects of the divide and conquer intrigue that has kept the Anglo Axis on top of the heap for centuries.
The main tricks in the bag are few and simple enough:
- Fostering ethnic and religious minorities and fanatics to destabilize rival empires, especially right-wing extremists who are destroyed when their dirty work is done;
- Countergang tactics, the secret sponsoring of atrocities in the name of a rival.
What's mind-boggling is the world-historical scope of their application.
The rise and fall of German Nazism and Russian Communism in the last century, as well as the trend to Islamic fundamentalism over the last two centuries - as seen in this year's elections in Iran and Palestine - have been fruits of the tactic of injecting extremism to incapacitate potential rivals.
This flies flat in the face of orthodox accidentalism, but it has been documented by historians. Anthony Sutton showed how Wall Street intervened on behalf of the Bolsheviks. Webster Tarpley chronicled the financing of Hitler by US-UK plutocrats in his "George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography," and the invention of Islamic fundamentalism by psychological warfare experts in the British Arab Bureau in the 19th century, in order to hobble and isolate the Arab world, in "9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA," ch. 14.
The creation of the "state of Israel" was the empire's master stroke that combines all these tricks: a perfect example of sponsoring a minority to destabilize an empire, even a potential one like the Arab world; of dividing and conquering, splitting the Asian and African halves of the Muslim world from each other; of fostering right-wing extremism and theocracy, both among the Arab population and the Ashkenazi colonists; and a full-time field laboratory for synthetic terrorism.
So the stage is set. It was well documented by the October Surprise and Iran-Contra scandals that the Ayatollahs of the last generation were right-wing tools of the Bush cabal behind Reagan (Tarpley). The election of the dupe Ahmedinajad is their latest trump. His timing on the nuclear issue was perfect to give the Russians a pretext to pull out from supplying the anti-aircraft weapons that could have protected them, and of course, the Americans get a pretext to smash Teheran before the new oil bourse can knock the pins out from under the global hegemony of the Useless Elite.
Ahmedinajad and Hamas have each drawn a huge X on the map of their own countries to be targeted for further punishment. Hamas, of course, got its start with funding from Sharon's Israel as "a counterweight to the PLO." They always do all they can to undermine any secular, modern political movement in target countries.
The cunning of the Anglos is extraordinary. Imposing their language and culture on the world has helped these wolves in sheep's clothing convince the world of their national cuddly nature. Through their stooges Hitler and Stalin, the German and Russian peoples acquired the recognized reputation for genocide - camouflaging the fact that the feat of liquidating and replacing the native populations of two continents, North America and Australia, is unique in the history of the world, to the true genocidalists extraordinaire: the Anglos.
Are they dangerous? History has amply revealed the intentions of the folk who set up a little beachhead 400 years ago on Cape Cod, the same nation that infiltrated colonists into Haifa and Jaffa because two continents are not Lebensraum enough. As for the American cousins, Bush Sr. was a leader of the eugenics and sterilization movement, Bush Jr. holds the record for executions, and their vizier Kissinger coined the genocidalist's motto - eliminate the useless eaters.
Mind you, that includes you, me and most of the planet.
It's exactly 400 years since the Anglos launched their empire with a war against Spain on the trumped-up pretext of the Guy Fawkes plot of 1605, which the Lord Chancellor himself had covertly arranged, just as 9/11 was an inside job - "the secret sponsoring of atrocities in the name of a rival." All this works on a paradoxical principle we could call reverse impact: the radical psychological warfighting method of covertly impersonating the rival or "enemy."
Most of humanity remains much too firmly wedded to simplistic thinking to even conceive of such a threat - implausibility becomes the perfect cover for the unthinkable. Our hapless human race is stuck at the toddler stage, oscillating between teddy-bear naïveté and mindless destructiveness. And the babysitter is Caligula, assisted by TV and schools which the vicious owners of our world control to keep the mental cage tight.
Only children and romantics still believe in the supreme power of nature in the modern world. This is Animal Farm, and we humans, like almost all other surviving large mammals, are farm animals on it. A few men are the masters, and even the seemingly spontaneous trends of current events is largely under their control.
Humanity is almost totally paralyzed in facing this challenge and seeing the hand of the herder and butcher. It lags light years behind in the kinds of knowledge that would remove this cancer, in near total ignorance of reverse impact tactics, or of the two types of conditioning that automate its existence, the repetitious and the traumatic. It stubbornly clings to simplistic and transactional thinking in a narrow scope. On this, our race doesn't make it to first base. It strikes out again and again on the same old tricks.
So on to # 6. Bin Laden was and always will be the creation of Brzezinski and the tool of the CIA and MI-6. He is probably dead, as Robert Fisk noted, wondering why no video, only audio? Only his master's voice remains, produced at will on a voice synthesizer. So why does the synthetic voice of synthetic terror endorse William Blum, the Marxist critic, and his catalogue of American war crimes all over the planet?
For one, this fakery outwardly appears to validate the flagging authenticity of the Bin Laden myth, as it outwardly seems too implausible that the CIA would give a boost to a book like "Rogue State." However, those who read such a work on "bin Laden's" endorsement are already hostile to that state anyway. Blum will reinforce them, as Tarpley points out, in the "blowback" notion, that 9/11 was an act of terror in revenge. This can only poison and confuse leftist minds, since no oppression justifies an attack on innocent victims, and bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11 anyway.
Terror began as and always remained primarily a reverse impact tool of the state, a raw material for propaganda. The "bin Laden" message is crafted to play to useful effect on different publics. Mainstream opinion is repulsed by it, and if bin Laden embraces Blum, that serves to absolve Uncle Sam of the sins Blum accused him of. Rightwing fools rejoice. The Arab world is plunged even further into confusion. Since Muslims feel their grievances against the Anglo-American-Ashkenazi Axis so acutely, the message makes it all too tempting to believe the "Arab rage" scenario, rather than joining in the effort to unmask 9/11 as the work of Western secret services, an effort which holds perhaps the only key to getting the monkey of war off the back of Islam.
And so to # 7, drills and chills. In the 2006 edition of "9/11 Synthetic Terror," Tarpley underscores how "anti-terror drills" were used as props to set up false-flag terror exploits like 9/11 and London 7/7. He calls on activists to identify such drills, to agitate and demonstrate against them, to broadcast the threat that the drill may be a cover for the state terror faction to carry out the real thing, to mobilize the local community against the drill and embarrass the terrorists out of business. And recently some activists are doing exactly that - warning against the "anti-nuclear terror drill" scheduled for Jan. 31 through Feb. 2 in Charleston, SC. Each time, more people learn the facts about false flag terror.
The Feb. 2 date is intriguing indeed - 2/2/2006 is all too reminiscent of the pseudo-illuminist numerology game our state terror boffins love to play. London's July 7, 2005 date works out to 7/7/7: 2005 adds up to 7. As for twice triple two, The Skull and Bones Club lodge number is 322, and Charleston is the most ancient site of the Scottish Rite in North America - as well as of the Ft. Sumter provocation, that sparked the British-inspired civil war bid to set up a troglodytic arch-fascist slave state.
Hitler got away with his 9/11 without too many questions, and Bush has gotten away with his Reichstag fire in spite of the tiny minority in the know. The laws and the bench are all in readiness for a police state, fastidiously legalistic, just the way the Nazi stooges did it. One little false-flag nuke attack, and there will be no looking back. No more questions asked, no more querulous Congress. The juggernaut of war and totalitarianism will have the way open for it, broad and smooth as the Autobahn. Once the Blitzkrieg is underway, they don't bother with pretexts.
They, whoever They are, the oligarchy, plutocracy, the super-rich, Rothschild, Rockefeller and Royal Family, the billionaire club, the useless elite, the purveyors of war, and their scurrying aides, have worked for a long time on their project of destroying the planet in order to possess it. Sometime during the 1890's the plot was hatched in its present, concrete form. Neutralize Eurasia: Germany, France, Russia and Japan, implant the cancer of strife in Palestine, promote the Wahhabi fundamentalists and destroy the Turkish empire, blow up the Maine and knock out Spain. Came the Great War, and 1917 the big wedding - Versailles, the ruinous reparations, the installation of the Bolsheviks, and the Balfour Declaration. Followed in the forties by the Holocaust, the most hideous covert sponsoring of atrocities of all time, with the biggest payoff - Palestine, keystone of Pangea, and a permanent talisman against all criticism.
Can we stop them now?
With such momentum matched by such massive ignorance, I don't know how, but we have to try. All we need is a miracle, and those still do happen.
Original: Scene Set for the Clash of Civilizations