The World Can’t Wait--Drive Out the Bush Regime • www.worldcantwait.org • 866-973-4463

December 12, 2005

For Immediate Release
Contact: Stan Rogouski at 866-973-4463, ext 4, press@worldcantwait.org

World Can’t Wait - Drive Out the Bush Regime Calls on President Bush to

Today, The World Can’t Wait - Drive Out the Bush Regime organization placed a full page ad in The New York Times calling for George Bush to step down from office, and take his program with him. Similar calls for the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, or Dick Cheney have appeared, but this is the first time an organization has run an ad in a national media outlet calling for the removal of the entire Bush regime and their program from power.

World Can’t Wait Drive Out the Bush Regime’s Call states that “your government” has not only waged a "murderous and utterly illegitimate war in Iraq” but is "moving closer each day to a theocracy”. It spells out the reasons why they should step down before the 2008 election Step Down in New York Times Ad
. The list of signers includes Jane Fonda, Gore Vidal, Harold Pinter, and Princeton University Professor Cornell West.

Ending with the point that “history is full of examples where people who had right on their side fought against tremendous odds and were victorious” but that it is also “full of examples of people passively hoping to wait it out, only to get swallowed up by a horror beyond which they never imagined,” the ad calls for a nationwide action intended to “drown out” Bush’s State of the Union address in January. This will consist both of local actions as well as a national demonstration in Washington D.C. on the Saturday following the State of the Union Address.

Selected signers of the ad are available for interviews.

There are some compassionate people in this world that feel the American people are genuine when they stand against the oppression and injustice committed by a government that no longer represents them. However, we have achieved most dispised nation status and are the laughing stock of the world.

Disgusted and very ashamed to be an American, and f... those pyops meatheads that would tell me to live somewhere else because of their own stupidity. I doubt they even know the diffence.

Well, it looks like the world CAN wait, since Bush is still here. Deal with it. He'll be here for three more years, and then another Republican will be there after him. The Democratic Party is finished. They are perceived as the cut and run party, and people don't vote for losers. But, hey, feel free to keep buying ads in the New York Times. Their readership is dwindling and they are losing money. People just aren't listening anymore. Just like no one is paying attention to the Moonbats baying at the moon.

Clinton should be in the docks for Waco, the OK bombing, NAFTA the slaughter in Bosnia etc. etc. Right along with the chimp for similar crimes of slaughter and especially, their puppet masters whom they serve

"the OK bombing"

How have I managed to miss this all these years.

Please. Pray tell us of this particular "shadow government" conspiracy.


This should be very interesting.

I became interested when, at the time, I heard that the rescue teams were pulled from the site to remove OTHER unexploded devices, so I did a bit of digging.
The earliest and most compelling challenge to the lone bomb/lone bomber theory came from Brigadier General Benton K. Partin (USAF, Retired), an expert with sterling credentials and a distinguished military career. On May 18, 1995, one month after the bombing, General Partin delivered a preliminary detailed analysis of the event to members of Congress. "From all the evidence I have seen in the published material," Partin testified, " I can say with a high level of confidence that the damage pattern on the reinforced concrete superstructure could not possibly have been attained from the single truck bomb without supplementing demolition charges at some of the reinforced column bases." In that report (See "OKC Bombing: Expert Analysis" in our June 26, 1995 issue), and in the detailed study which he released on July 13, 1995 (see "Explosive Evidence" in our August 7, 1995 issue), Partin eviscerated the prosecution’s lone-bomb thesis with a host of findings from the forensic evidence indicating that demolition charges were certainly used inside the Murrah Building.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1998/vo14no15/vo14no15_bombs.htm

And then
-© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

An analysis of raw news footage and reports in the immediate aftermath of the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City, Okla., shows local television reporters stating repeatedly that two additional, sophisticated, undetonated explosive devices were found by investigators on the scene.

The television reports raise questions about the official government version of events that an "extremist" and his friend acted alone, using a Ryder rental truck and a 1,200-pound ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, or ANFO, bomb to destroy the face of the building.

For example, initial news broadcasts by KWTV-9, KFOR TV-5 and Channel 4 News all feature reports confirmed by state, local and federal officials that a total of three bombs had been placed inside the Murrah building.

TV news footage showed Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department bomb squad vehicles being brought to the scene within a half-hour of the explosion, "amid reports" that "more bombs have been found" by rescuers.

Also, reporters at the scene confirmed that the two other bombs were larger than the first one, and that the bomb that had exploded blew up inside -- not outside -- the building.

Reports said the other two bombs were found on the east and west sides of the building; the explosion occurred at the front, or north side, of the building.

And then there's the analysis of the acknowledged expert on ordinance.

-Ben Partin, a retired brigadier general in the United States Air Force, has provided every member of Congress a detailed, comprehensive report of his analysis of the April 19, bombing.

The general contends the explosion was caused in part by demolition charges placed at critical structural points inside the building.

The official story by the Clinton administration's FBI, accepted virtuallly without question by the Establishment media, is that the bombing was caused solely by a single truck bomb consisting of 4,800 pounds of ammonium nitrate transported to the location in a Ryder truck which was parked outside the building.

Partin said the destruction to the building could not have possibly resulted from such a bomb alone.

To verify his analytical conclusions, Partin visited Oklahoma City during the last week of June 1995, where he had the opportunity to review hundreds of photographs taken throughout the cleanup operation.

The photos, taken before the debris was hauled off and buried at another site, provide, in Partin's view, "irrefutable evidence that at least four demolition charges were set off at four critical columns of the reinforced concrete structure at the floor level of the third floor."

Says Partin: "Based on my experience in weapons development and bomb damage analysis, and on my review of all evidence available, I can say, with a high level of confidence, that the damage pattern on the reinforced concrete superstructure could not possibly have been attained from a single truck bomb without supplementing demolition charge.

More to come...

Notice how the 'truck bomb' morphed from a 1200lb to a 4800lb bomb.
Meanwhile, you may wish to listen to this audio from Guns and Butter



The Oklahoma City Bombing: Prelude to 911
Presentation by former Oklahoma State Representative, Charles Key and documentary film producer, Chris Emery
Aug 17, 2005
http://www.gunsandbutter.net/archives.php?page=2

From a report by Benton K. Partin, Brigadier Gen. USAF (Ret.)

Ken's quick explanation of Partin's diagram:

1. The red dot surrounded by circles shows the location of the truck bomb.

2. The force of an explosion (pounds per square inch) diminishes drastically as it moves through air. By the time it reaches column B-3, in the second tier of columns, it is only 27 pounds per square inch.

3. Column B-3 was entirely taken out while the column next to it B-4 which would have received slightly more force was untouched.

4. Columns A-3, A-5, and A-7 were collapsed at the 3rd floor level. Columns A-4, A-6, and A-8 were collapsed by the odd number columns adjacent to them. Note that Column A-7 is well out of the area of main blast force.

5. These results are entirely consistent with demolition charges going off on B-3, A-3, A-5, and A-7. The size of the explosives needed would be minimal if there were attached directly to the columns.

6. Several experienced demoltion experts, physicists and munitions experts agree with Partin that there is no way this damage could have been done by the truck bomb alone. None of these were permitted to be witnesses on the McVeigh or Nichols trial. The only munitions expert allowed to testify was from the UK and her testimony did not address Partin's thesis.

7. Contrary to investigative procedures - and common sense - the Murrah Building was demolished and its remains were buried in a local landfill. Requests for an independent examination of the evidence were denied.

Diagram shown on this URL of bomb damage.
http://www.brasscheck.com/OKBOMB/murrah.html

All baiting aside, I will look it all over and thanks for taking the time to post all this.

The above links may wet your curiosity to my opinion that yes, Clinton is another in a long line of criminal CEOs by the Wall Street government that belong in a cage with their masters. If the public ever becomes curious.
The longer you get fooled the more pissed off you become when you find out how you've been screwed. To paraphrase.