Check out their message board:

http://www.saveourstate.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3239

They have a user who has as his avatar the defaced Aztlan Underground logo.

So, they are focusing on investingating and harrassing a bunch of young people who go to see a "political" music event.

Maybe they *should* check it out. It could open their minds.

...is that the discussion alone puts the lie to SOS. The Anarchist Gathering isn't about immigration, nor are Anarchists notable for their masses of undocumented membership. --OK, their membership *is* undocumented, but you know what I mean : )--

SOS is just a bunch of couch potatos who want to whine about why life hasn't lived up to the fantasies their parents told them, whether that be an all-white world or a pro-US world or whatever fairy tale they want to conjure up. The white Republican American Dream hasn't worked out to their satistaction, and they want to complain about it. Who's gonna be the first to tell them they were lied to?

The rant by "The Mórrígan" sounds a lot like what I hear from the misfits on the left. Life has not lived up to their dream!

I get the impression that all of these embarrassing smack downs that these SOSMM scumbags have suffered from at the hands of _real_ Americans and _real_ communities have prompted the scumbags to seek recruiits -- hence their amusinbg notions about assaulting the whites at the Sawdust Festival in Laguna Beach, California. }:-}

When faced with _real_ Americans who oppose white supremists, racism, and everything else, these SOSMM get their clocks cleaned and their pathetic impotence must sting a bit. }:-} SO perhaps they're actually going to see if they can recruit more violent racists into their cult by sifting through self-proclaimed "anarchists."

My conjectures only, of course, and nobody else's, yet I find their freakishly bizarre Republican behavior and IQs to be both amusing and pathetic -- and quite possibly the results of having been driven to cast about for support among a populace that has almost entirely outgrown everything these SOSMM scumbags stand for.

My opinions only.

OK, let's give up a collective farm in the inner city because the city sold it out from under the farmers who were using it to feed their families. And while we're at it, let's sell off the public beaches, which are doing far less good--in fact, they're giving many of us skin cancer. And the city would get a lot more money for them. Or how about Griffen Park? There's some real estate ripe for development! And while we're at it, let's sell off the libraries, since only a few ivory tower scholars, school children, and poor people hang out there.

No, Freedom and No to Mexicans aren't going to give up their beaches, parks, or libraries. They want Los Angeles to fill up its treasury with a few acres used by People Who Don't Look Like Them, even though the beaches, parks, and libraries have a much higher net worth on the open market. But that would be depriving white people, and that never even flitted across Freedom or No to Mexicans' minds. They just want to run more Mexican-Americans off the land, a small scrap once mincingly allotted to them for food from the original Anhuac, now greedily grabbed back.

Fred, I think the "Christians/Catholics" thing comes from the US Southeast, although I hear it frequently in CA too. It's a colloquialism for "Protestant-Catholic." I don't think it's intended to suggest that Catholics aren't christian, but that may be it's origin. You'll see it on Catholic and Protestant sites if you google "Catholic and Christian."

looking at their website traffic you'll see they're dying ^



Leslie accidently posted the reply to the wrong thread ?

I do that sometimes :)

Lots and lots of SOS hits come from anti-SOS people. Every activist I know frequents their site, probably more than they do.

Also, many of their members are actually moles. I'm not going to prove this here but I could if I chose to.

There is one member on their site that posts regularly and is accepted as one of them that is actually a good friend of mine. I know of others as well.

I'd estimate that 2/3 of their traffic is anti-SOS people.

Leslie, I think you are in the wrong thread.

I knew many of the hits were us checking them out (like in this thread saying so)

when the hit count falls below a certain level they fall off the graph



the trend is downward over time showing people are rejecting their message and rejecting *them*

Their hit count is so low I bet I could make a noticable blip just by crawling their site - and I'm on dialup

I was hoping people wouldn't mole them so we could watch them slide in oblivion even faster, but it's satisfyingly low in any case and most importantly - downward