04/22/2005 Sheila Green of New Sewickley Township was successful in her efforts to have Beaver County stop using its .2 million UniLect Corp. Patriot touch-screen voting system. The Times / Lucy Schaly
Woman's quest to decertify voting system succeeds
By: J.D. Prose - Times Staff
04/22/2005
Sheila Green of New Sewickley Township was successful in her efforts to have Beaver County stop using its .2 million UniLect Corp. Patriot touch-screen voting system. The Times / Lucy Schaly
NEW SEWICKLEY TWP. - Sheila Green said she never wanted to be a crusader against Beaver County's electronic voting system, but county officials just wouldn't heed her warnings.
"I was hoping to save them embarrassment," the New Sewickley Township resident said. "I just met this immense wall of resistance. They weren't hearing me at all."
Spurned by local officials and a judge last year in her efforts to have the county stop using its .2 million UniLect Corp. Patriot touch-screen voting system, Green took her argument to the state, which certifies all voting systems used in Pennsylvania.
"I wanted (the Patriot system) to be secure enough. I wanted it to be good-enough technology. I like computers," said Green, a 46-year-old part-time computer instructor at the Community College of Allegheny County. "It isn't a reality yet. It's science fiction. Like hover cars."
After her court case failed last fall, Green circulated a petition and got 18 other county residents to sign it. She paid a 0 filing fee, which forced the state to re-examine the Patriot system.
On Feb. 15, Michael Shamos, a computer professor at Carnegie Mellon University retained by the state, retested the Patriot system. Earlier this month, Shamos told state officials that UniLect's machines were unreliable and shouldn't be used in Pennsylvania elections.
To the surprise of many, including Green, Pennsylvania Secretary of State Pedro Cortes immediately decertified the Patriot system, throwing into question the May 17 primary. The Department of State oversees elections in Pennsylvania.
"I really expected them to whitewash it," Green said. "They did the right thing. I don't know why. I never expected it."
Since Cortes' decision April 7, officials in Beaver, Greene and Mercer counties - the only three Pennsylvania counties that use the system - have been frantically shifting preparations for the primary from the Patriot system to an optical-scan method, which uses scanners to read paper ballots marked in pencil by voters.
The state has promised to pay for any costs associated with implementing the optical-scan method.
Jack Gerbel, president of California-based UniLect, asked state officials to allow him to address the eight major deficiencies that Shamos claimed made his system unreliable. In another surprising decision, the state department, which was also prodded by state legislators, an-nounced last week that it would give Gerbel the opportunity to have his system retested by Shamos today.
State officials said the Patriot system could be recertified for use in Pennsylvania if Shamos approves. Beaver County Commissioners Chairman Dan Donatella said that he has full confidence in Shamos and that the county would use the Patriot system if it meets the state's standards.
A skeptical Green said she doubts Gerbel can have his voting system ready.
"I really don't think that he can fix the essential problems that exist with the system," she said. "I don't see any possibility of (a recertification) occurring."
Green, a native of Geauga County, Ohio, said she started to question the reliability of electronic voting the first time she used the Patriot system in November 1998, the first election it was used in Beaver County.
And the more she read about electronic voting, the more she began to believe that the systems weren't secure or reliable. She exchanged e-mails with Gerbel but didn't receive satisfactory answers, Green said.
etc
http://www.timesonline.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=14396364&BRD=2305&PAG=461&dept_id=478569&rfi=6