We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

States 'can postpone' U.S. elections

by Ritt Goldstein Friday, Oct. 29, 2004 at 9:43 AM

Both President Bush and some State's - including Florida, New York and California - can potentially postpone the election in "emergency circumstances". Over the last 4 months, three Congressional Research Service reports addressed election postponement, their findings unsettling - Congress appears duly "concerned".


States 'can postpone' U.S. elections

By Ritt Goldstein
Special to UPI

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20041025-035002-8538r.htm

Washington, DC, Oct. 25 (UPI) -- Next week's presidential election could in theory be postponed by individual states, even though there is no federal government authority to do so, the Congressional Research Service concluded after a series of investigations into the impact of a terror attack on the electoral process.


Individual states also may have the authority in an emergency to suspend elections and simply make appointments to the Electoral College, which retains the authority to elect the president.

These emergency powers of the states, based on Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution, override the resolution passed in the U.S. House of Representatives last July by 419 votes to 2 against granting any power to the federal government to postpone elections.

The CRS found that a state legislature has the option of pursuing "an alternate method of choosing Presidential Electors besides popular elections," should a regular election be impacted by emergency circumstances. This could mean bypassing a popular vote, with the legislature selecting the presidential electors.

The cumulative implications of the CRS reports, assessed as a whole for the first time in a special United Press International inquiry, mean that traditional democratic procedures could legally be overridden by states in time of terrorist attack or emergency.

After it was disclosed last summer that the Department of Homeland Security had queried the Department of Justice regarding the possibility of delaying the Nov. 2 election should the country come under attack, there were allegations that the Republican-controlled executive branch was willing to postpone the elections for political rather than national-security reasons.

However, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice told CNN at the time, "I don't know where the idea that there might be postponement of elections comes from."

Other members of the Bush administration also downplayed the Homeland Security-Justice contacts. But a number of senior congressional lawmakers had raised strong concerns regarding possible postponement implications, and the CRS then set to work and produced a series of reports on the issue.

CRS, emphasizing that "there is no current constitutional authority" for the president or executive branch to "postpone, cancel, or reschedule elections for federal office," did note that there "might certainly be some potential emergency powers ... as well as those delegated by statute" that could allow the president such options.

But "there is no precedent" for those powers being used in a presidential election, the CRS researchers found.

"There may also certainly be, of course, serious political implications for a president to exercise inherent or implied 'emergency' powers to affect the timing, and thus possibly the turnout and outcome, of an election in which that president himself is a candidate," CRS stated.

The nearest practical instance occurred Sept. 11, 2001 -- when New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani postponed mayoral primaries in his city because of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Giuliani, however, was not seeking re-election in that race. Also, some races were postponed due to the recent hurricanes in the U.S. southeast.

These were cases that the CRS supports -- that the power to delay an election lies with the states and smaller political entities, even when the election is federal in nature.

Article 2 of the Constitution gives both the U.S. Congress and each state's legislature authority for presidential elections, which the CRS noted is not a "national referendum" but rather a "series of state (and District of Columbia) elections for presidential electors" -- meaning that the states and the district select the electors who do the formal voting for president in a gathering of the Electoral College.

Regarding a "disruption just prior to an election," CRS found neither legal precedents nor any "clear and definitive authority on this question."

On July 22 the House of Representatives passed a resolution by a lop-sided 419-2 against giving federal authority to postpone Election Day, but CRS documents reveal that a number of states, including Florida, which is expected to be as tightly contested as in 2000, have legislated postponement provisions independently.

On Sept. 22 the CRS said that state election laws potentially superseding the set election date do exist. A Florida law explicitly addresses elections, stating that the "governor may, upon issuing an executive order declaring a state of emergency or impending emergency, suspend or delay any election."

Ohio and Florida are presently viewed as the presidential race's two key battlegrounds. When the Ohio secretary of state's office was asked about the existence of state-level postponement provisions, a spokesman for Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, James Lee, firmly replied, "No."

A Sept. 22 CRS document cited postponement laws from 15 states, including California, which has a statute allowing for the governor to postpone elections. The California measure can be invoked by circumstances such as "receipt by the state of a warning from the federal government indicating ... attack is probable or imminent."

A situation in which the federal government would increase its color-coded alert system to "red" -- meaning an attack is imminent -- appears sufficient to trigger postponement.

Some of the other states cited by the CRS as having postponement statutes include Arizona, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New York, North Carolina and Texas. A check with other states showed that no such laws exist in at least Minnesota, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.

Measures to potentially postpone voting in case of terrorist attack or its threat were said to exist in Wisconsin, Iowa and Nevada, though the Nevada spokesperson indicated that their plan was on a county basis. No information was provided by representatives of Colorado or New Mexico.

Some of the election officials reached volunteered that their offices have been in contact with the Department of Homeland Security.

Copyright 2004 United Press International

Links to CRS Documents

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/RL32623.pdf - 4 October

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/RS21942.pdf - 22 September

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/RL32471.pdf - 14 July
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy