|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by C/O Diogenes
Monday, Jun. 16, 2003 at 10:30 PM
"Instead of apologizing for not letting me see
my son, they won't even let me have the
photographs. I never believed things would come
to this," al-Ahmar said on the weekend in a
telephone call from prison. "Do you know what I
felt when the judge refused to let me have the
photos? That I am living in the age of slavery,
when children were taken from their fathers as
soon as they were born."
The appalling loss of humanity
By Gideon Levy
Last Monday, attorney Leah Tsemel wanted to give
some photographs to her client, who was standing a
few meters from her in the military courtroom at
the Ofer base near Ramallah.
The photographs were of Quds,
the firstborn son of
administrative detainee Abed
al-Ahmar, who is being held in
custody without trial. Quds was
born two months ago, while his
father was in military custody.
Military judge Major Ronen
Atzmon refused to allow the
photos to be passed to
al-Ahmar, who has never seen his child. Atzmon
was unwilling to assume the security
responsibility for such a move.
This incident may seem trivial in view of the
mutual bloodbath of the past few days, but it
is precisely these minor events that show the
level of cruelty that the Israeli occupation
has reached. The story of our moral
deterioration is to be found here, no less than
in the acts of killing.
Al-Ahmar can't see his newborn son because
family visits to security prisoners were banned
three years ago and have not been reinstated.
The fact that his wife is a Jewish Israeli is
of no help. Thousands of Palestinian prisoners
and detainees have been totally cut off from
their families for three years without a
telephone call or a visit. There are not many
regimes in the world that treat their prisoners
this way.
Last week, al-Ahmar's administrative detention
was extended for another six months for the
17th time (not consecutively); he is one of
about 1,000 detainees being held today without
trial. It has to be said again that, if the
defense establishment has any material against
al-Ahmar and the other administrative
detainees, it must put them on trial. If not,
they must be set free.
"Instead of apologizing for not letting me see
my son, they won't even let me have the
photographs. I never believed things would come
to this," al-Ahmar said on the weekend in a
telephone call from prison. "Do you know what I
felt when the judge refused to let me have the
photos? That I am living in the age of slavery,
when children were taken from their fathers as
soon as they were born."
Still, al-Ahmar's fate is better than that of
Asmaa Abu al-Haija, a 37-year-old woman from
the Jenin refugee camp. She, too, is being held
in prison without trial; no one, including her
lawyer Tamar Peleg, knows why. Meanwhile, her
five children are abandoned in the refugee
camp. Their father and older brother are also
in prison, having been convicted of being Hamas
members.
Al-Haija has a tumor in her head, which gives
her headaches and a partial loss of vision.
According to recent testimonies from Neve Tirza
women's prison, she sleeps on the floor because
the blinding headaches make it impossible for
her to sleep in the bunk bed in her cell.
Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) says the
prison authorities have so far denied her
medical treatment of any kind. An urgent
request submitted by the group's Michal Bar-Or
to the head of the Prison Service's health
department, Dr. Alex Adler, to give al-Haija a
CT test at the urging of her Palestinian
doctor, went unanswered for weeks, until a
"prisoner's petition" was filed.
A Prisons Service spokeswoman, Hanna Nitzan,
said in response that the prisoner was examined
and is receiving medical treatment. Al-Haija's
lawyer said the arrest warrant issued against
her by the military commander of the region
referred to the prisoner as a male: "He is
endangering the security of the region." No one
bothered to change the standard text.
But the cruelest aspect of al-Haija's story is
that she is not allowed to phone her five
children, the youngest of whom is a 6-year-old
girl. Five children remain without a father and
a mother, and it does not even occur to the
prison authorities, in view of the harsh family
circumstances, to consider the possibility to
depart from the regulations prohibiting
security prisoners from making phone calls.
The official response: "The security prisoner is
denied telephone calls because of a procedure
that applies to all the security prisoners in
Israel." Has no one seen fit to show a modicum
of compassion, at least for the children who
have been left without their parents and
without a house, which was destroyed by
missiles in an IDF operation?
A state that prevents a prisoner who has been
held in custody for years without trial from
receiving photographs of a son he has never
seen? That prevents a woman who is under
detention without trial from phoning her
children, whose father and brother are also in
prison? We are even capable of this. This has
nothing to do with the war against terrorism.
The battle against the murderous terrorist
attacks cannot justify such behavior. Even at a
time when Hamas is perpetrating horrific
suicide bombings, Israel is liquidating people
and everything is going up in flames, we must
not ignore what appear to be relatively
small-scale incidents that reflect such
appalling loss of humanity.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=303622&contrassID=2&subContrassID=4&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
Report this post as:
by Diogenes
Monday, Jun. 16, 2003 at 10:31 PM
...where the Bush Junta got the idea.
Report this post as:
by Real Islam is Real Evil
Wednesday, Jun. 18, 2003 at 6:25 PM
Oh gee, those darn Joooos keep getting in the way of those peaceful islamic killer's bombs, how very rude of them.
It is so nice of Diogene to point out how evil those Israels are for not laying down and letting the mudslum kill them to please the Pig Goddess allah.
Report this post as:
by Muhammad called for their death
Wednesday, Jun. 18, 2003 at 6:31 PM
`
nazi_jihad.jpgf3tvgr.jpg, image/jpeg, 702x504
When the prophet of Islam started preaching his new religion in Mecca, he was conciliatory to Christians and Jews. He told them, "We believe in what has been sent down to us and sent down to you, our God is the same as your God. "Surah 29:45. This attitude changed completely after he gained strength. Allah then tells him to
"Fight People of the Book (Christians and Jews), who do not accept the religion of the truth (Islam), until they pay tribute (penalty tax) by hand, being inferior." Surah 9:29.
Regarding Christians and Jews, it seems that Mohammed hated the Jews more. During his lifetime, Mohammed devoted much of his efforts to get rid of the Jews: "You (Jews) should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His apostle, and I want to expel from this land ( the Arabian Peninsula), so, if anyone owns property, he is permitted to sell it". Mohammed was quoted.
At that time there were in Medina three Jewish tribes. Two of them, the Qaynqa and the Bani-al-Nudair tribes, were besieged by Mohammed’s men, blocking their access to food supplies, until they surrendered on Mohammed’s terms, which were that their lives would be spared, that they must emigrate from Medina, and that they must deposit all their belongings at a certain place for distribution among Muslims.
The third tribe, Bani Quayza, was not as lucky. After the war of the trench, in which Mohammed was besieged by the Qurayshites led, by Abu Sofyan, it was alleged that Bani Qurayza agreed to provide help from within to Abu Sofyan’s forces. Although the alleged help did not materialize and the siege eventually ended, nevertheless, Mohammed never forgave them for their willingness to help his enemies.
Muslims turned against Bani Qurayza and blocked their streets for twenty five days.
The Jewish tribe expressed readiness to accept the surrender terms which had been conceded to the other two Jewish tribes, namely cession of their belongings and departure with safe conduct.
Mohammed, however, would not consent to this, and instead appointed as an arbiter Saad iben Moaz, a man who was known to be on bad terms with Bani Qurayza. Saad ruled that all Bani Qurayza’s men should be beheaded, that the women and children should be sold as slaves, and that all their property should be divided among the Muslims.
Trenches were dug in the bazaar of Medina for disposal of the nine hundred Jewish bodies whom Mohammed had spent the night slaughtering. (See Ibn Hisham: The Prophet’s Biography: vol 2 pages 40&41.)
Wow, just how poorly uneducated and evil do you have to be to believe that "God" would have talked to this intensely evil man... Say what you want, but I don't remember hearing about Jesus or Buddha killing the male population of an entire village then selling the women and children into slavery. Wonderful muhammad, what a sick joke.
To think these stupid muslims name their children after this asshole, pathetic.
Report this post as:
|