- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by Stop the Bullshit
Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 3:48 PM
This article explains exactly why the war in Iraq is not for oil.
I am tired of these war protesters saying this war is for oil. They say the war is for oil while not really telling us why it wouldn't make sense for the United States to attack Iraq for its oil. I am not an expert on the subject so I thought maybe you people would become convinced this war is not really for oil if you hear from an expert who actually knows something about oil. His name is Jerry Taylor, and he is an oil expert and the Director of Natural Resources Studies at the Cato Institute in Washington. He has even testified on Capital Hill and served on congressional testimony bodies.
Mr. Taylor spoke to BBC news.com
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2861721.stm) about this "Blood for Oil" argument. Mr. Taylor says that: "Is the war with Iraq about oil when all is said and done? The anti-war movement seems to think so. I am not so sure.
Unless the peace movement has discovered telepathy, I doubt that it's in any better position to divine the hidden thoughts or secret motivations of George Bush and Tony Blair than I am. Arguing about unstated motives, therefore, is a waste of time - claims cannot be proven or disproven.
Is it so difficult to imagine that both Bush and Blair sincerely believe - rightly or wrongly - that a well-armed Iraq poses an intolerable danger to the civilized world? If access to oil were of concern to them, one might have expected members of their administrations to hint as much. After all, the Thatcher and Bush "senior" administrations were quite open about the role that oil played in justifying the first go-around in Kuwait. Polls in the United States revealed at the time, moreover, that the public responded favourably to the argument. Why the supposed reticence now?
Regardless, it's difficult to know exactly what's being alleged when one is confronted by the slogan "No Blood for Oil!"
If the argument is that war is primarily being executed to ensure global access to Iraqi oil reserves, then it flounders upon misunderstanding. The only thing preventing Iraqi oil from entering the world market in force is the partial U.N. embargo on Iraqi exports. Surely if access to Iraqi oil were the issue, it would have occurred to Bush and Blair that removing the embargo is about 100 billion dollars cheaper - and less politically risky - than going to war.
If the argument is that war is being undertaken to grab Iraqi reserves, flood the market with oil, bust the OPEC cartel, and provide cheap energy to western consumers, then war would be a dagger pointed at the heart of big oil companies. That's because low prices equal low profits. But if the market were flooded with cheap Iraqi oil, it would also wipe out the small-time producers in Texas, Oklahoma, and the American Southwest that President Bush has long considered his best political friends.
Accordingly, it's impossible to square this story with the allegation that President Bush is a puppet of the oil industry. If oil company "fat cats" were calling the shots - as is often alleged by the protesters - President Bush would almost certainly not go to war. He would instead embrace the Franco-German-Russian plan of muscular but indefinite inspections. Because keeping the world on the precipice of uncertainty regarding conflict is the best guarantee that oil prices, (and thus, oil profits,) will remain at current levels.
If the argument is that "Big Oil" is less interested in high prices than it is with outright ownership of the Iraqi reserves, then how can we account for Secretary of State Colin Powell's repeated promise that the oil reserves will be transferred to the Iraqi government after a new leadership is established? Do the protestors think that this high-profile public commitment is a bald-faced lie? If outright ownership of oil is the real goal of this war, then I'm forced to wonder why the U.S. didn't seize the Kuwaiti fields more than 10 years ago.
If the argument is that this war is aimed at installing a pro-American regime more inclined to grant oil contracts to American and British rather than French and Russian oil firms, then it invites a similar charge that France and Russia are against war, primarily to protect their cosy economic relationships with the existing Iraqi regime. Regardless, only one or two American or British firms in this scenario would "win" economically while the rest would lose because increased production would lower global oil prices and thus profits. Because no one knows who would win the post-war contract "lottery," it makes little sense for the oil industry (or the politicians who supposedly cater to them) to support war.
Moreover, the profit opportunities afforded by Iraqi development contracts are overstated. The post-war Iraqi regime would certainly ensure that most of the profits from development were captured by the new government, whose reconstruction needs will be monumental. In fact, Secretary Powell has repeatedly hinted that Iraqi oil revenues would be used for exactly that purpose. Big money in the oil industry goes to those who own their reserves or who secure favourable development contracts, not to those who are forced to surrender most of the profits up-front through negotiation.
If the argument is that the United States is going to war to tame OPEC by ensuring that a puppet regime friendly to America holds the second largest reserves within the cartel, then it runs up against the fact that the United States has never had much complaint with OPEC. Occasional posturing notwithstanding, both have the same goal: stable prices between 20 and 28 dollars a barrel. The cartel wants to keep prices in that range because it maximizes their profits. The United States wants to keep prices in that range because it ensures the continued existence of the oil industry in the United States without doing too much damage to the American economy. The United States doesn't need a client state within the cartel, particularly when the cost of procuring such a state will reach into the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Oil, however, is relevant to this extent: Whoever controls those reserves sits atop a large source of potential revenue which, in the hands of a rogue state, could bankroll a sizeable and dangerous military arsenal. That's why the United States and Great Britain care more about containing the ambitions of Saddam Hussein than, say, the ambitions of Robert Mugabe. Still, if seizing oil fields from anti-western regimes is the name of the game, why aren't U.S. troops massing on the Venezuelan border and menacing Castro "Mini-Me" Hugo Chavez?
In sum, the argument that the war with Iraq is fundamentally about oil doesn't add up. While everyone loves a nice, tidy political morality play, I doubt there is one to be found here."
This quote was an exact copy of the transcript of what Jerry Taylor said. If you still believe this war is for oil then I feel pity for you. You can see the transcript at --
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2861721.stm --- and then click on -Jerry Taylor: the war is not about "blood for oil"-
Report this post as:
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 46 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
|Cato institute you got to be kidding.
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 7:59 PM
|The whole thing is a big pile of bullshit
||Pissed Off in Ohio
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 8:12 PM
|MY DAD KILLS FOR THE USA
||MY DAD KILLS FOR THE USA
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 8:41 PM
|To MY Dad Kills
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 8:49 PM
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 9:13 PM
|IF IT'S NOT FOR OIL...
||Fuck All Right Wingers
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 9:28 PM
|Rightwingers do it Right
||Fuck the Protesters
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 10:02 PM
|HERE YA GO, FUCK THE PROTESTORS
||Here's Bambi's Mom
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 10:57 PM
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 11:03 PM
|Sheep, Deer...it's all the same
||TO YOU RIGHT WING FUCKERS
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 11:08 PM
|Yes, Yes I will
||Friday, Apr. 04, 2003 at 11:12 PM
|Liberal Ranting Doesn't Fool Me
||Stop the Bullshit
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 12:53 AM
|Fine, have it your way!
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 5:06 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 5:46 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 7:52 AM
|For long drawn out Post above
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 8:08 AM
|No Blood for oil, you say?
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 9:34 AM
|FUCK, ERIC, YOU ARE SO DUMB
||Eric, Get A Brain Transplant
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:32 AM
|You are so clueless:
||BUSH ADMIRER SUCKS CHENEY'S DICK
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:43 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:53 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:54 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:54 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:54 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:57 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 10:59 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:01 AM
|Ask yourself this question: If they had no oil, would we be there?
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:02 AM
| how much oil do they have in Afghanistan?
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:09 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:15 AM
|Oil and Afghanistan
||GET A CLUE
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:16 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:16 AM
|I know you don't think
||could be me, could be someone else
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:38 AM
|Already used to it
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 11:44 AM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 1:48 PM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 2:47 PM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 2:50 PM
|Polls do not measure...
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 3:03 PM
||Saturday, Apr. 05, 2003 at 3:21 PM
|Are dead Iraqi civilians only tragic if Iraqis kill them?
||Sunday, Apr. 06, 2003 at 9:53 AM
|Re: Legitimate reasons #1-4
||Sunday, Apr. 06, 2003 at 4:39 PM
|Jeff: Great Response
||WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER
||Sunday, Apr. 06, 2003 at 4:45 PM
||Sunday, Apr. 06, 2003 at 5:53 PM
|Boy, ain't that the truth!
||Read your own words
||Sunday, Apr. 06, 2003 at 10:04 PM
Change Links 2018 July posted
More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena
"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena
Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles
Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert!
Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California
Change Links June 2018 posted
The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years
Unity Archive Project
Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi
CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police
Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies
California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings)
Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico
Change Links May 2018
Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed
GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE
lausd whistle blower
Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images
UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light
Change Links April 2018
Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018
Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018!
Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert!
Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A.
Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released
Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups
More Local News...
Un monde de pauvreté
14 Disturbing Facts About Scott Gottlieb, Trump's FDA Head
Behind the scenes at fbi National Academy
Treasury Takes Aim at Shell Companies
Paraphysique de l'intelligence
Oklahoma GOP Senator Jim Inhofe's Bloody Record
Globalization: hope on the horizon despite Fake Liberals.
Sorry President Trump,Ted Cruz Texas Judicial System,is Worse Than Many Shithole Countries
The Shortwave Report 07/20/18 Listen Globally!
The System Question as a Survival Question
Nation's Largest Voting Machine Co., ESS, Admits Lying Re Having Installed Remote Control
Du pain et des jeux
Paraphysique de martyrologie
Children Incorporated Earns 4-Star Rating on Charity Navigator
Democratic Socialists of America
Leonard Peltier Non Violent Native American Political Prisoner since 1970's
Paraphysique miscellanées de l'aggiornamento
FBI Investigated LA County Sheriff Baca,Why Not Hank Skinner's Persecution?
Updated Partial List Of Famous Vegetarians, Vegans, & Fruitarians
The Shortwave Report 07136/18 Listen Globally!
Social Policy as Social Infrastructure
Vol I: 84 Varieties Of GOP Election Fraud
Texas Can Call it An Execution,But It is A State Sponsored Murder of Hank Skinner..
June 2018 Honduras coup update
Maria Estrada doubles down on racist support
New York Women in Film & Television Announces 2018 NYWIFT Ha Phuong Scholarship Recipients
Trapps de la domination, trapps de l'aliénation
Please Work For The Defeat Of Brett Kavanaugh And Why
More Breaking News...