imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Are we Federal Children owned by the Government??

by see material Friday, Jul. 19, 2002 at 12:43 AM

Your best investment in understanding may be a Black's Law dictionary, then you will understand the fraud that has been sucking away your life since you arrived on this planet!!

Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg



Rumor Mill News Reading Room Forum

ARE WE 'FEDERAL CHILDREN' OWNED BY GOVERNMENT?

Posted By: hobie

Date: Wednesday, 17 July 2002, 3:40 p.m.

Found posted at RMNEW DAILY EMAILS,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RMNEWS_DAILY_EMAILS/message/27182

-----

From: "A Voice For Children"

Date: Wed Jul 17, 2002 8:33 am

Subject: Are We "Federal Children" owned by the Government?

-----Original Message-----

From: Charles Stewart

Subject: Are We "Federal Children" owned by the Government?

Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:41:33 -0500

From: "Beaver Cole"

Reply-To: "Beaver Cole"

Organization: Cole Publications

Provided By: Dave Champion

Are we "Federal Children," owned by the Government?

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth

"registration" or what we now know as the "birth certificate." It was

known as the "Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a

law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health

of mothers and infants, and for "other purposes." One of those other

purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to

cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and

expenditures. What it really did was create a federal birth registry

which exists today, creating "federal children." This government, under

the doctrine of "Parens Patriae," now legislates for American children

as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public

school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most

aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated

into the process of asking for "permission" from Daddy government to do

all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in

what is called a "free country."

Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered

into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These

records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as

"official" records. Since 1921 the American people have been registering

the births and names of their children with the government of the state

in which they were born, even though there is no federal law requiring

it. The state tells you that registering your child?s birth through the

birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the United

States, thereby making him/her a United States citizen. For the past

several years a social security number was mandated by the federal

government to be issued at birth.

In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors

of the then 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of their

states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from

the Federal Reserve system.

To wit: "Full faith and credit" clause of Const. U.S. article 4. Sec. 1,

requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had

by law or usage of state of it?s origin. That foreign statutes are to

have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that

a judgment or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive

effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage

in the state from whence taken.

Black?s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. Cites omitted.

The state claims an interest in every child within it?s jurisdiction.

The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights

and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children.

The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a

valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable

assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who

have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the

trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security

number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the

assets of the trust to be tracked. If this information is true, your

child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children,

are considered assets of the bankrupt united states. We are now

designated by this government as "HUMAN RESOURCES," with a new crop born

every year."

In 1923, a suit was brought against federal officials charged with the

administration of the maternity act, who were citizens of another state,

to enjoin them from enforcing it, wherein the plaintiff averred that the

act was unconstitutional, and that it?s purpose was to induce the States

to yield sovereign rights reserved by them through the federal

Constitution?s 10th amendment and not granted to the federal government,

and that the burden of the appropriations falls unequally upon the

several States, held, that, as the statue does not require the plaintiff

to do or yield anything, and as no burden is imposed by it other than

that of taxation, which falls, not on the State but on her inhabitants,

who are within the federal as well as the state taxing power, the

complaint resolves down to the naked contention that Congress has

usurped reserved powers of the States by the mere enactment of the

statute, though nothing has been, or is to be, done under it without

their consent (Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Mellon, Secretary of

the Treasury, et al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury

et. Al..) Mr. Alexander Lincoln, Assistant Attorney General, argued for

the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. To wit:

I. The act is unconstitutional. It purports to vest in agencies of the

Federal Government powers which are almost wholly undefined, in matters

relating to maternity and infancy, and to authorize appropriations of

federal funds for the purposes of the act.

Many examples may be given and were stated in the debates on the bill in

Congress of regulations which may be imposed under the act. THE FORCED

REGISTRATION OF PREGNANCY, GOVERNMENTAL PRENATAL EXAMINATION OF

EXPECTANT MOTHERS, RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF A WOMAN TO SECURE THE

SERVICES OF A MIDWIFE OR PHYSICIAN OF HER OWN SELECTION, are measures to

which the people of those States which accept its provisions may be

subjected. There is nothing which prohibits the payment of subsidies out

of federal appropriations. INSURANCE OF MOTHERS MAY BE MADE COMPULSORY.

THE TEACHING OF BIRTH CONTROL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF PERSONS ABOUT

TO MARRY MAY BE REQUIRED.

By section 4 of the act, the Children?s Bureau is given all necessary

power to cooperate with the state agencies in the administration of the

act. Hence it is given the power to assist in the enforcement of the

plans submitted to it, and for than purpose by its agents to go into the

several States and to do those acts for which the plans submitted may

provide. As to what those plans shall provide, the final arbiters are

the Bureau and the Board. THE FACT THAT IT WAS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN

EXPLICIT TERMS TO PRESERVE FROM INVASION BY FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE RIGHT

OF THE PARENT TO THE CUSTODY AND CARE OF HIS CHILD AND THE SANCTITY OF

HIS HOME SHOWS HOW FAR REACHING ARE THE POWERS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO BE

GRANTED BY THE ACT.

(1) The act is invalid because it assumes powers not granted to Congress

and usurps the local police power. McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316,

405; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549-551.

In more recent cases, however, the Court has shown that there are limits

to the power of Congress to pass legislation purporting to be based on

one of the powers expressly granted to Congress which in fact usurps the

reserved powers of the States, and that laws showing on their face

detailed regulation of a matter wholly within the police power of the

States will be held to be unconstitutional although they purport to be

passed in the exercise of some constitutional power. Hammer v.

Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251; Child Labor Tax Case, 259 U.S. 20; Hill v.

Wallace, 259 U.S. 44.

The act is not made valid by the circumstance that federal powers are to

be exercised only with respect to those States which accept the act, for

Congress cannot assume, and state legislatures cannot yield, the powers

reserved to the States by the Constitution. Message of President Monroe,

May 4, 1822; 4 Elliot?s Debates, p. 525; Pollard?s Lessee v. Hagan, 3

How.212; Escanaba Co. v. Chicago, 107 U.S. 678; Coyle v. Oklahoma, 221

U.S.559; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 223 U.S. 390

(2) The act is invalid because it imposes on each State an illegal

option either to yield a part of its powers reserved by the Tenth

Amendment or to give up its share of appropriations under the act.

A statute attempting, by imposing conditions upon a general privilege,

to exact a waiver of a constitutional right, is null and void. Harrison

v. St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co., 232 U.S. 318; Terral v. Burke

Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529.

(3) The act is invalid because it sets up a system of government by

cooperation between the Federal Government and certain of the States,

not provided by the Constitution.

Congress cannot make laws for the States, and it cannot delegate to the

States the power to make laws for the United States. In reference

Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545; Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149;

Opinion of the Justices, 239 Mass. 606.

The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been

found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set

up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated

authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once

declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the

past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The constitution

hasn?t changed. What has changed is the way this government views human

life. Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by

government.

The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked.

Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional

anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the

several states does not exist and if defended properly would never

survive a court challenge as shown above. Writing letters to elected

public servants won?t save us when we all know their agenda does not

include serving those who place them in power. Perhaps the 10th

amendment of the federal constitution guaranteeing states rights will,

when making it known that we as individuals of the several states will

not be treated as chattel of the U.S. government.

If the federal government believes they own us, and as such have the

right to demand national I.D. cards, and health I.D. cards, which will

in truth tag us as we tag our animals, then let them bring forth the

documents to prove their authority to demand or legislate for it. If

our God given rights to liberty and freedom which were the foundation

upon which this nation was created do not exist, and liberty and

freedom is only an illusion under which the American people suffer,

then let the governments of this nation come forward and tell it?s

people. If we are indeed free, then we should not have to plead or beg

our elected public servants to be treated as such. If, in truth we are

not free, then perhaps it?s time to let the final chapter of the Great

American Revolution now be written........

More Info at: http://www.christiancommonlaw-gov.org/



Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg



Rumor Mill News Reading Room Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 4.31.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-->

Report this post as:

LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 1 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
State vs Federal Citizenship Randy Grant Friday, Jul. 19, 2002 at 1:40 PM

Local News

Marshall Tuck’s racist dog whistle O27 5:01AM

Marshall Tuck’s ethnocentrism contradicts Californian values O27 4:32AM

Contra Costa-Hawkins O25 3:48AM

Debunking Some Anti-Prop 10 Propaganda O12 6:56AM

Why Should California Choose De Leon Over Feinstein? O10 9:55PM

Change Links September 2018 posted S02 10:22PM

More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre A30 11:09PM

Site Outage Friday A30 3:49PM

Change Links August 2018 A14 1:56AM

Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land A12 11:09PM

More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke J29 10:40PM

Change Links 2018 July posted J09 8:27PM

More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena J02 7:16PM

"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena J02 7:08PM

Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles J30 11:26PM

Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! J11 6:58AM

Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California M31 5:20AM

Change Links June 2018 posted M28 7:41AM

The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years M22 8:01PM

Unity Archive Project M21 9:42AM

Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi M17 10:22PM

CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police M10 9:08PM

Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies M10 8:57PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

Paraphysique du scientisme N18 9:19AM

USDA Withholds Names Of Turkey Companies Spreading Salmonella N17 7:51PM

Hebron, Ben-Gurion, and UNESCO N17 6:00PM

What Can Destroy Enclosure? N17 1:47PM

Please Help Mississippians Vote For Mike Espy On Nov 27th N17 7:42AM

The Incredible & Brilliant Work of Dr TOMO SHIBATA N17 5:19AM

October 2018 Honduras Coup update N16 9:22PM

Profit de guerre, guerre de profit N16 11:58AM

“Animaniacs in Concert!” Starring Voice Legend Rob Paulsen Heads to Seattle N15 7:22PM

Paraphysique du prodrome oukase N15 12:39PM

President Trump: Hurricane Relief Should not Pay Puerto Rico Debt N14 8:54PM

94 Of Rick Scott's, Brian Kemp's, the Mississippi GOP's & Other Republican Campaign Crime N13 9:42PM

30 Of Brian Kemp's Felonious Racist Vote Suppression Crimes N13 8:42PM

Help translation of From Islam To Womanism book on IndieGoGo N13 12:04PM

COP 21, 25, 32, de l'écocide organisé N11 11:45PM

fbi & fmj are ' Lord of the Flies ' N11 8:26PM

Parangon d'une grande infestation N11 12:03AM

Video: Beautiful Country Burn Again, 39 min N10 10:19PM

OBAMA WERE POW'S LEFTBEHIND IN AFGHANISTAN IRAQ AND LIBYA N08 7:57PM

OBAMA WERE POWS LEFT BEHIND IN AFGAHNISTAN IRAQ AND LIBYA N08 7:29PM

DID BARACK OBAMA LEAVE POWS BEHIND IN AFGAHNISTAN IRAQ AND LIBYA N08 6:43PM

DID BARACK OBAMA LEAVE POWS BEHIND IN AFGHANISTAN IRAQ AND LIBYA N08 5:50PM

Paraphysique de l'Etat d'urgence N08 4:24AM

Republican Vote Fraud Reached A New Level In Midterms N07 7:50PM

Lobotomisation populationnelle N07 7:28AM

Texas Finally Ousts Culberson! N07 4:43AM

Israel Quit UNESCO, Um-Shmum, Make Ben-Gurion Proud! N06 7:37PM

Mafia City Hack Mod Generator - Generate 15.000 Gold N06 2:04AM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy