We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by Ake Tyvi
Monday, Jun. 17, 2002 at 11:57 AM
email@example.com Rasink., FIN-01360 VANTAA
Layer says 'it is not a crime to let someone else access private property, than the owner'.
PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNING AGAINST LAW IN FINLAND
Statement number 1051/4/02 from Parliamentary Ombudsman?s Office say ?it is not a crime letting someone else, than the property owner access the property You are in charge of, even the property would have been stolen?. Statement was given by assisting Parliamentary Ombudsman Ilkka Rautio and presenting official Eero Kallio. By using the same statement any burglar could stole Parliamentary Ombudsman?s personal property from his house ? please be my quest.
Later on with reference 1455 Parliamentary Ombudsman?s Office says ?You complaint (related to private property owning) will be indroduced by presenting official Eero Kallio ? the same person who the complaint was concern about. What does a disqualified person mean in content of ?not being able to handle his own mistake??
Report this post as:
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by
the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and
rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the
contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center.
Running sf-active v0.9.4