The Importance of Leadership

errorAMERICAN DISSIDENT VOICES: Broadcast of June 1, 2002

The Importance of Leadership
By Dr. William Pierce

Hello!

Every time I fly somewhere for a meeting or a speaking engagement, I
have to spend an hour or two in airports. That's a very democratic
experience. One really sees the dregs of humanity in airports these
days. It used to be that what bothered me most was seeing young White
women with mongrel offspring in tow. What irritates me at least as much
these days is the sight of young White males trying to look and act like
Blacks. In every airport one sees these sorry specimens wearing hip-hop
garb: backward baseball caps, baggy shorts or trousers, and clueless
expressions on their faces. More and more one sees these slack-jawed
cretins with their hair done in cornrows and pieces of metal through
their lips or cheeks or nostrils.

I mentioned in a recent broadcast that I saw young Whites like this
shuffling along the sidewalks of Philadelphia during one of my rare
visits to that urban pesthole last month. The more White males I see
garbed and groomed like Blacks, the less surprised I am to see White
females leading by the hand the disgusting proof that they have been
dabbling in bestiality. It's obvious that this sort of degeneracy is
rapidly becoming much more widespread. When I did an interview with
Rolling Stone magazine nearly two years ago, they sent along a German
photographer who had his blond hair done in dreadlocks. I don't know why
I should expect more of Germans than that. After all, they have had 57
years -- two generations -- of Judaeo-American forced education in
democracy now. Turn on any TV receiver in Germany, and you will see much
of the same poisonous, race-destroying filth from Hollywood that you see
here. Young Germans watch Sumner Redstone's MTV just about as much as
young Americans do. And in Germany as in America: monkey see, monkey do.

Last year the first-place photojournalism award for the best photograph
by a newspaper photographer went to Mike Urban of the Seattle
Post-Intelligencer, for a photograph he took during the Mardi Gras riot
there. I talked about that riot on this program last year. Gangs of
Blacks ran through the mostly White crowd of Mardi Gras revelers,
snatching purses, punching White women in the face, throwing them to the
ground, and kicking them senseless, while Seattle's cops stood on the
sidelines and refused to interfere, lest they be accused of "racial
profiling." One young White man who tried to help a young White woman
who had been knocked down and was being kicked by Blacks, was smashed in
the head by a Black wielding a bottle and was killed. I repeatedly
watched the newsreel footage of the riot, and it clearly was a
Black-on-White riot.

But not entirely. There were some Whites among the rioters: "wiggers" I
call them. That means "White niggers." They're the ones with the
backward baseball caps. Mike Urban's prize-winning photograph, which the
Seattle Post-Intelligencer did not have the courage to publish, is of a
young White woman in the crowd who has been stripped naked by a gang of
men and is being pawed and sexually abused by some of them while others
constrain her. Most of the 20 or so men holding the naked girl down and
pawing her are non-Whites: mestizos or Blacks. But in the photograph one
can see clearly three or four White males -- wiggers -- grinning as they
help the Blacks hold the struggling girl: a shocking and sickening
portrait of the reality of multiculturalism.

What should be done with wiggers? In my view they are a thousand times
worse than Blacks, and when the time of cleansing for America comes,
they certainly will be dealt with first.

And there's another class of White people we can do without. They don't
wear hip-hop clothes or have their hair done in cornrows. On the
socioeconomic ladder they're a rung or two above wiggers, but they're at
least as bad as wiggers. They are the Whites who collaborate with the
Jews. With the exception of the German photographer for Rolling Stone,
who was a wigger, virtually all the other journalists with whom I've
dealt are in the collaborator class. They don't help rioting Blacks tear
the clothes off White girls and sexually abuse them, but they help the
Jews generate the social climate in which that sort of thing can happen.
They help the Jews disseminate their multicultural propaganda. They help
the Jews teach young Whites that they shouldn't resist Blacks, that it's
all right to mix with them. They help the Jews indoctrinate politicians
and police officials with Political Correctness, so that White cops are
less likely to intervene to protect Whites from Blacks. Sumner Redstone
could not spread his poisonous, racially destructive, hip-hop filth
through his MTV channel without the active collaboration of thousands of
White helpers.

And its not just the Whites who help Redstone by buying advertising on
MTV or working for him as announcers or scriptwriters who are
collaborators. Here's an example: a month ago a small, nearly all-White
South Dakota college town was turned upside down when it was discovered
that a Black basketball player the local college recently had imported
from Chicago was infected with HIV and was having sex with the White
girls at the college: with lots of them. Nearly everybody at the college
had to have an HIV test, and it turned out that several of the girls
there already had become infected by the Black. It's likely that a few
of the White boys will be testing positive for HIV pretty soon.

The only reason this story made the news is that the Black basketball
player knew he was infected and was having sex with White girls without
telling them of his infection. He had found out he was infected after a
routine blood test, but he kept the news to himself so as not to
interfere with his sex life. Well, there's a law against that sort of
thing in South Dakota, and so now the Black is locked up and out of
circulation. To me the shocking thing is not that the Black was
deliberately infecting his sex partners; the shocking thing is that
White college girls were willing to have sex with him, and that White
college boys were willing to tolerate that sort of behavior and to have
sex themselves with girls they knew had been having sex with a Black. So
far as I am concerned, every White woman who has sex with any Black
deserves to be infected with HIV and to die a horrible death from AIDS.

But the really reprehensible people in this story are the White college
officials who imported this Black basketball player from Chicago. I
imagine that before they found out that he was spreading HIV through the
whole student body they were quite proud of themselves for having
brought some "diversity" to this White college. I have a pretty strong
suspicion that these academic idiots wouldn't have been bothered a bit
about White girls having sex with the Black if it hadn't been for the
HIV. They would be proud that they had taught the girls to be so
"tolerant." They would be happy that the White girls aren't "racists."

These South Dakota college officials almost certainly aren't Jews, but
they are doing the Jews' work for them. Sumner Redstone and the other
media Jews have been working for decades to create the moral and
ideological climate where this sort of thing could happen -- they have
been making racial mixing fashionable -- but without the active
collaboration of White college officials and White journalists and White
politicians and White Christian preachers all of the Jews' racially
destructive efforts would have been in vain.

I'm sure that everyone listening is familiar with situations similar to
that at the South Dakota college, but without the HIV. There are
Christians in small communities all across the Whiter areas of America
who feel guilty that their communities are so White, and many of these
guilt-stricken Christians have tried to remedy the situation by
importing Blacks or other non-Whites into their churches or their
communities. Some of them even bring in the Blacks from as far away as
Africa. And again, the Jewish media people have been the biggest factor
in generating the moral and ideological climate in which being White is
something to feel guilty about, but it is local Gentile preachers and
teachers and politicians and journalists who actually do the destructive
work of making their communities more racially "diverse."

So what's to be done with all of these collaborators if we want one day
to have a clean America again?

The reason we're discussing this subject today is that there is a
difference of opinion among members in my own organization, the National
Alliance, about what attitude we should have toward wiggers and
collaborators. Some members believe that we should take the hardest
possible line toward them. Whether they are wiggers or White women who
consort with Blacks or White journalists who follow the Jewish party
line or White politicians who do the Jews' bidding in order to get
themselves elected or any other sort of collaborator, they should all be
put up against a wall and given traitors' justice.

And some members of the National Alliance believe that we should be more
understanding of the conditions, of the environment, that made these
wiggers and collaborators opt for treason.

Now, all of this is pretty academic at this time, since we're still a
long way from being able to punish anybody for anything. About all we
can do now is try to understand what is happening in the world around us
and communicate with others, help others understand. But I should tell
you that until a few years ago I was pretty much in agreement with the
hard liners. I was in favor of getting rid of all of the wiggers and all
of the collaborators as a first step toward building a healthy society
for our people.

But my views on this have changed as I have learned more about human
motivation and human behavior. What I have come to understand about
people -- our people, White people -- is that there are very few,
probably only a fraction of a per cent, who are consciously evil: a
fraction of a per cent who collaborate with the Jews knowing that they
are helping the Jews destroy our people but who do it anyway for reasons
of personal gain. These collaborators fit the clinical definition of
psychopath: people without conscience. I believe that most politicians
are in this category.

And there are only a small minority of our people who have an innate
moral sense, a minority of two or three or four per cent of the White
population who are able to think independently and form their own views
about what is good and what is evil, what is right and what is wrong.

And the remaining 95 per cent or so of the population simply don't have
minds or consciences of their own. They may be bright or they may be
dull, they may have good work habits or they may be lazy and careless,
they may be well disciplined and have good character or they may be weak
and self-indulgent slobs, but all of them conform their opinions about
what is right and what is wrong, about what is proper behavior and what
is unacceptable, to their perception of the opinions and behavior of
their peers.

No matter how foolish we may think their opinions, no matter how
perverse we may consider their behavior, they have no innate compass for
judging these things; they can only conform their thinking and their
behavior to the thinking and behavior they perceive in their peers.
Sometimes -- that is, at most times in the past, prior to the last
century -- what they perceived was real. They observed and listened to
their neighbors at first hand. And especially they observed and listened
to community leaders, to role models, to authority figures, including
especially parents. So what we had in the past among this 95 per cent of
our people were patterns of thinking and behavior that varied primarily
with social class. But the patterns were based on perceptions of real
behavior among peers.

Since the rise of the mass media during the past century, however -- and
especially since the rise of television during the past half-century --
what has been perceived has been increasingly artificial. What has been
perceived has to a large degree not been the thinking and behavior of
their flesh-and-blood peers that have evolved naturally over the course
of generations, but rather the artificially contrived behavior and
pretended thinking of actors and actresses and commentators on movie
screens and TV screens and of models in magazine advertising.
Scriptwriters and film directors and spin doctors and advertising
executives have to a very large degree taken the place of parents and of
other natural role models in shaping the thinking and behavior of the
masses. And of course, perception gradually becomes reality. Eventually
we observe among our peers behavior that is very similar to that we see
on our television screens. But the mass media -- especially the mass
media of entertainment -- continue to lead and to move and to shape
public thinking and public behavior.

That is a fact with profound implications. I'll recapitulate: Most
people -- probably 95 per cent of the population -- are neither good nor
evil. They are morally neutral. Their attitudes and opinions and
aspirations -- their moral judgments and their behavior -- are
determined not by any innate sense of right and wrong but rather are
conformed to the attitudes and behavior they perceive in their peers,
real or artificial, and especially to the attitudes and behavior they
perceive in role models and authority figures. When those role models
and authority figures incorporate and display what is best in a people,
then the attitudes and behavior of the masses will be good and
progressive and characteristic of the best tendencies in the race. If
the leaders and role models display noble qualities and greatness, then
the masses will strive toward nobility and greatness. They won't all get
there, of course, but they will strive for those qualities, and many
will achieve them.

If their leaders show their racial consciousness and pride and their
respect for the best traditions of their people, then the masses also
will be racially conscious and will try to behave in a way that displays
racial pride and respect for tradition. They will not even consider
mixing with non-Whites or imitating their ways, and they will not
tolerate such behavior in their peers. The concept of racial treason
will be abhorrent to them.

But if their role models and authority figures display the worst and
weakest traits in the people, then that behavior will be reflected in
the behavior of the masses. And if their role models and authority
figures are mere puppets controlled by aliens whose aim is the
demoralization and destruction of the people, then the masses will
behave in the way we can see them behaving on the streets of
Philadelphia or in our airport terminals today. That is the consequence
of permitting the Jews to gain a dominant influence over our mass media
of news and entertainment.

And so what is the point in shooting wiggers or collaborators, except as
an educational measure, to provide an example of behavior that will not
be tolerated in a healthy society? Or perhaps, in the case of wiggers,
we might consider shooting the most slack-jawed among them as a eugenic
measure.

The point is that what we need to aim for is not eliminating the great
mass of people who have bad behavior or bad attitudes, but rather
changing their role models and authority figures. We should not even
think about getting rid of the lemmings, just because they have been
behaving badly. They make up the great majority of every society, and it
is necessary that they do so. They provide the stability and
cohesiveness necessary for a viable society. A society cannot tolerate
too many independent thinkers, just as it cannot tolerate too many
psychopaths.

Think about these things. I know that it took me a lot of thinking and a
lot of observing to become quite sure that what I have just told you is
in fact correct. Twenty years ago I believed that people are born with
all of the fundamental traits that they will display as adults. And at
one level -- a very basic level -- that is true. Intelligence -- various
types of intelligence -- is a group of fundamental traits that
individuals are born with. And there certainly are inherited tendencies
toward certain types of behavior as well. But these are underlying
tendencies, and the ways in which these underlying tendencies are
expressed in individuals -- the ways in which they manifest themselves
as the individuals mature -- are very much subject to external
influences.

The 15-year-old, slack-jawed White boy encountered on a Philadelphia
sidewalk who wears a backward baseball cap and baggy trousers and
collects basketball cards with pictures of Black players could have
turned out to be a decent White teenager instead, with pride of race and
aspirations to be a policeman or a soldier or a craftsman: perhaps not a
brilliant member of White society, but at least a constructive member.
The 20-year-old White woman encountered in an airport terminal with
needle marks on her arms and three mulatto offspring trailing behind her
could have turned out to be that White policeman or soldier or
craftsman's wife, living a clean life and proudly bearing and caring for
his children.

For the masses, everything depends on the examples that are set for
them, on their role models and authority figures. Monkey see; monkey do.

That is why it does not behoove us to think of ourselves at war against
wiggers and collaborators. When I see a White kid wearing hip-hop
clothing, I still feel a strong urge to kick. And when I see a White
woman with mongrel offspring, I wish that I could call in an air strike
against New York or Washington or Philadelphia or Los Angeles; I really
have an urge to lay waste to the whole society that tolerates such
abominations.

But I understand that our task is not to kick and shoot and bomb;
instead it is to communicate and to teach. We don't need to try to
communicate with the wiggers and the collaborators now. But we do need
to communicate with those of our people capable of being positive role
models and authority figures, and we do need to continue to build our
means -- our media -- for reaching ever larger numbers of ordinary White
people: those who have not yet been completely corrupted by the aliens
who have subverted our mass media into a weapon for waging genocide
against our people.

When the time comes there will be enough punishment for those who need
it. But what most of our people need who are behaving badly now is not
punishment but good leadership, good examples. And that is what we must
strive to give them.

Thanks for being with me again today.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to: adv-list-request@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe

==> TO BE REMOVED send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-request@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Unsubscribe

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To comment on this broadcast, please write to: national@natvan.com To
report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site, please
write to: webmaster@natvan.com

To contact us via "snail mail," write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946

The National Alliance: http://www.natvan.com
http://www.natall.com