The Importance of Leadership

AMERICAN DISSIDENT VOICES: Broadcast of June 1, 2002

The Importance of Leadership

By Dr. William Pierce

Hello!

Every time I fly somewhere for a meeting or a speaking engagement, I

have to spend an hour or two in airports. That's a very democratic

experience. One really sees the dregs of humanity in airports these

days. It used to be that what bothered me most was seeing young White

women with mongrel offspring in tow. What irritates me at least as much

these days is the sight of young White males trying to look and act like

Blacks. In every airport one sees these sorry specimens wearing hip-hop

garb: backward baseball caps, baggy shorts or trousers, and clueless

expressions on their faces. More and more one sees these slack-jawed

cretins with their hair done in cornrows and pieces of metal through

their lips or cheeks or nostrils.

I mentioned in a recent broadcast that I saw young Whites like this

shuffling along the sidewalks of Philadelphia during one of my rare

visits to that urban pesthole last month. The more White males I see

garbed and groomed like Blacks, the less surprised I am to see White

females leading by the hand the disgusting proof that they have been

dabbling in bestiality. It's obvious that this sort of degeneracy is

rapidly becoming much more widespread. When I did an interview with

Rolling Stone magazine nearly two years ago, they sent along a German

photographer who had his blond hair done in dreadlocks. I don't know why

I should expect more of Germans than that. After all, they have had 57

years -- two generations -- of Judaeo-American forced education in

democracy now. Turn on any TV receiver in Germany, and you will see much

of the same poisonous, race-destroying filth from Hollywood that you see

here. Young Germans watch Sumner Redstone's MTV just about as much as

young Americans do. And in Germany as in America: monkey see, monkey do.

Last year the first-place photojournalism award for the best photograph

by a newspaper photographer went to Mike Urban of the Seattle

Post-Intelligencer, for a photograph he took during the Mardi Gras riot

there. I talked about that riot on this program last year. Gangs of

Blacks ran through the mostly White crowd of Mardi Gras revelers,

snatching purses, punching White women in the face, throwing them to the

ground, and kicking them senseless, while Seattle's cops stood on the

sidelines and refused to interfere, lest they be accused of "racial

profiling." One young White man who tried to help a young White woman

who had been knocked down and was being kicked by Blacks, was smashed in

the head by a Black wielding a bottle and was killed. I repeatedly

watched the newsreel footage of the riot, and it clearly was a

Black-on-White riot.

But not entirely. There were some Whites among the rioters: "wiggers" I

call them. That means "White niggers." They're the ones with the

backward baseball caps. Mike Urban's prize-winning photograph, which the

Seattle Post-Intelligencer did not have the courage to publish, is of a

young White woman in the crowd who has been stripped naked by a gang of

men and is being pawed and sexually abused by some of them while others

constrain her. Most of the 20 or so men holding the naked girl down and

pawing her are non-Whites: mestizos or Blacks. But in the photograph one

can see clearly three or four White males -- wiggers -- grinning as they

help the Blacks hold the struggling girl: a shocking and sickening

portrait of the reality of multiculturalism.

What should be done with wiggers? In my view they are a thousand times

worse than Blacks, and when the time of cleansing for America comes,

they certainly will be dealt with first.

And there's another class of White people we can do without. They don't

wear hip-hop clothes or have their hair done in cornrows. On the

socioeconomic ladder they're a rung or two above wiggers, but they're at

least as bad as wiggers. They are the Whites who collaborate with the

Jews. With the exception of the German photographer for Rolling Stone,

who was a wigger, virtually all the other journalists with whom I've

dealt are in the collaborator class. They don't help rioting Blacks tear

the clothes off White girls and sexually abuse them, but they help the

Jews generate the social climate in which that sort of thing can happen.

They help the Jews disseminate their multicultural propaganda. They help

the Jews teach young Whites that they shouldn't resist Blacks, that it's

all right to mix with them. They help the Jews indoctrinate politicians

and police officials with Political Correctness, so that White cops are

less likely to intervene to protect Whites from Blacks. Sumner Redstone

could not spread his poisonous, racially destructive, hip-hop filth

through his MTV channel without the active collaboration of thousands of

White helpers.

And its not just the Whites who help Redstone by buying advertising on

MTV or working for him as announcers or scriptwriters who are

collaborators. Here's an example: a month ago a small, nearly all-White

South Dakota college town was turned upside down when it was discovered

that a Black basketball player the local college recently had imported

from Chicago was infected with HIV and was having sex with the White

girls at the college: with lots of them. Nearly everybody at the college

had to have an HIV test, and it turned out that several of the girls

there already had become infected by the Black. It's likely that a few

of the White boys will be testing positive for HIV pretty soon.

The only reason this story made the news is that the Black basketball

player knew he was infected and was having sex with White girls without

telling them of his infection. He had found out he was infected after a

routine blood test, but he kept the news to himself so as not to

interfere with his sex life. Well, there's a law against that sort of

thing in South Dakota, and so now the Black is locked up and out of

circulation. To me the shocking thing is not that the Black was

deliberately infecting his sex partners; the shocking thing is that

White college girls were willing to have sex with him, and that White

college boys were willing to tolerate that sort of behavior and to have

sex themselves with girls they knew had been having sex with a Black. So

far as I am concerned, every White woman who has sex with any Black

deserves to be infected with HIV and to die a horrible death from AIDS.

But the really reprehensible people in this story are the White college

officials who imported this Black basketball player from Chicago. I

imagine that before they found out that he was spreading HIV through the

whole student body they were quite proud of themselves for having

brought some "diversity" to this White college. I have a pretty strong

suspicion that these academic idiots wouldn't have been bothered a bit

about White girls having sex with the Black if it hadn't been for the

HIV. They would be proud that they had taught the girls to be so

"tolerant." They would be happy that the White girls aren't "racists."

These South Dakota college officials almost certainly aren't Jews, but

they are doing the Jews' work for them. Sumner Redstone and the other

media Jews have been working for decades to create the moral and

ideological climate where this sort of thing could happen -- they have

been making racial mixing fashionable -- but without the active

collaboration of White college officials and White journalists and White

politicians and White Christian preachers all of the Jews' racially

destructive efforts would have been in vain.

I'm sure that everyone listening is familiar with situations similar to

that at the South Dakota college, but without the HIV. There are

Christians in small communities all across the Whiter areas of America

who feel guilty that their communities are so White, and many of these

guilt-stricken Christians have tried to remedy the situation by

importing Blacks or other non-Whites into their churches or their

communities. Some of them even bring in the Blacks from as far away as

Africa. And again, the Jewish media people have been the biggest factor

in generating the moral and ideological climate in which being White is

something to feel guilty about, but it is local Gentile preachers and

teachers and politicians and journalists who actually do the destructive

work of making their communities more racially "diverse."

So what's to be done with all of these collaborators if we want one day

to have a clean America again?

The reason we're discussing this subject today is that there is a

difference of opinion among members in my own organization, the National

Alliance, about what attitude we should have toward wiggers and

collaborators. Some members believe that we should take the hardest

possible line toward them. Whether they are wiggers or White women who

consort with Blacks or White journalists who follow the Jewish party

line or White politicians who do the Jews' bidding in order to get

themselves elected or any other sort of collaborator, they should all be

put up against a wall and given traitors' justice.

And some members of the National Alliance believe that we should be more

understanding of the conditions, of the environment, that made these

wiggers and collaborators opt for treason.

Now, all of this is pretty academic at this time, since we're still a

long way from being able to punish anybody for anything. About all we

can do now is try to understand what is happening in the world around us

and communicate with others, help others understand. But I should tell

you that until a few years ago I was pretty much in agreement with the

hard liners. I was in favor of getting rid of all of the wiggers and all

of the collaborators as a first step toward building a healthy society

for our people.

But my views on this have changed as I have learned more about human

motivation and human behavior. What I have come to understand about

people -- our people, White people -- is that there are very few,

probably only a fraction of a per cent, who are consciously evil: a

fraction of a per cent who collaborate with the Jews knowing that they

are helping the Jews destroy our people but who do it anyway for reasons

of personal gain. These collaborators fit the clinical definition of

psychopath: people without conscience. I believe that most politicians

are in this category.

And there are only a small minority of our people who have an innate

moral sense, a minority of two or three or four per cent of the White

population who are able to think independently and form their own views

about what is good and what is evil, what is right and what is wrong.

And the remaining 95 per cent or so of the population simply don't have

minds or consciences of their own. They may be bright or they may be

dull, they may have good work habits or they may be lazy and careless,

they may be well disciplined and have good character or they may be weak

and self-indulgent slobs, but all of them conform their opinions about

what is right and what is wrong, about what is proper behavior and what

is unacceptable, to their perception of the opinions and behavior of

their peers.

No matter how foolish we may think their opinions, no matter how

perverse we may consider their behavior, they have no innate compass for

judging these things; they can only conform their thinking and their

behavior to the thinking and behavior they perceive in their peers.

Sometimes -- that is, at most times in the past, prior to the last

century -- what they perceived was real. They observed and listened to

their neighbors at first hand. And especially they observed and listened

to community leaders, to role models, to authority figures, including

especially parents. So what we had in the past among this 95 per cent of

our people were patterns of thinking and behavior that varied primarily

with social class. But the patterns were based on perceptions of real

behavior among peers.

Since the rise of the mass media during the past century, however -- and

especially since the rise of television during the past half-century --

what has been perceived has been increasingly artificial. What has been

perceived has to a large degree not been the thinking and behavior of

their flesh-and-blood peers that have evolved naturally over the course

of generations, but rather the artificially contrived behavior and

pretended thinking of actors and actresses and commentators on movie

screens and TV screens and of models in magazine advertising.

Scriptwriters and film directors and spin doctors and advertising

executives have to a very large degree taken the place of parents and of

other natural role models in shaping the thinking and behavior of the

masses. And of course, perception gradually becomes reality. Eventually

we observe among our peers behavior that is very similar to that we see

on our television screens. But the mass media -- especially the mass

media of entertainment -- continue to lead and to move and to shape

public thinking and public behavior.

That is a fact with profound implications. I'll recapitulate: Most

people -- probably 95 per cent of the population -- are neither good nor

evil. They are morally neutral. Their attitudes and opinions and

aspirations -- their moral judgments and their behavior -- are

determined not by any innate sense of right and wrong but rather are

conformed to the attitudes and behavior they perceive in their peers,

real or artificial, and especially to the attitudes and behavior they

perceive in role models and authority figures. When those role models

and authority figures incorporate and display what is best in a people,

then the attitudes and behavior of the masses will be good and

progressive and characteristic of the best tendencies in the race. If

the leaders and role models display noble qualities and greatness, then

the masses will strive toward nobility and greatness. They won't all get

there, of course, but they will strive for those qualities, and many

will achieve them.

If their leaders show their racial consciousness and pride and their

respect for the best traditions of their people, then the masses also

will be racially conscious and will try to behave in a way that displays

racial pride and respect for tradition. They will not even consider

mixing with non-Whites or imitating their ways, and they will not

tolerate such behavior in their peers. The concept of racial treason

will be abhorrent to them.

But if their role models and authority figures display the worst and

weakest traits in the people, then that behavior will be reflected in

the behavior of the masses. And if their role models and authority

figures are mere puppets controlled by aliens whose aim is the

demoralization and destruction of the people, then the masses will

behave in the way we can see them behaving on the streets of

Philadelphia or in our airport terminals today. That is the consequence

of permitting the Jews to gain a dominant influence over our mass media

of news and entertainment.

And so what is the point in shooting wiggers or collaborators, except as

an educational measure, to provide an example of behavior that will not

be tolerated in a healthy society? Or perhaps, in the case of wiggers,

we might consider shooting the most slack-jawed among them as a eugenic

measure.

The point is that what we need to aim for is not eliminating the great

mass of people who have bad behavior or bad attitudes, but rather

changing their role models and authority figures. We should not even

think about getting rid of the lemmings, just because they have been

behaving badly. They make up the great majority of every society, and it

is necessary that they do so. They provide the stability and

cohesiveness necessary for a viable society. A society cannot tolerate

too many independent thinkers, just as it cannot tolerate too many

psychopaths.

Think about these things. I know that it took me a lot of thinking and a

lot of observing to become quite sure that what I have just told you is

in fact correct. Twenty years ago I believed that people are born with

all of the fundamental traits that they will display as adults. And at

one level -- a very basic level -- that is true. Intelligence -- various

types of intelligence -- is a group of fundamental traits that

individuals are born with. And there certainly are inherited tendencies

toward certain types of behavior as well. But these are underlying

tendencies, and the ways in which these underlying tendencies are

expressed in individuals -- the ways in which they manifest themselves

as the individuals mature -- are very much subject to external

influences.

The 15-year-old, slack-jawed White boy encountered on a Philadelphia

sidewalk who wears a backward baseball cap and baggy trousers and

collects basketball cards with pictures of Black players could have

turned out to be a decent White teenager instead, with pride of race and

aspirations to be a policeman or a soldier or a craftsman: perhaps not a

brilliant member of White society, but at least a constructive member.

The 20-year-old White woman encountered in an airport terminal with

needle marks on her arms and three mulatto offspring trailing behind her

could have turned out to be that White policeman or soldier or

craftsman's wife, living a clean life and proudly bearing and caring for

his children.

For the masses, everything depends on the examples that are set for

them, on their role models and authority figures. Monkey see; monkey do.

That is why it does not behoove us to think of ourselves at war against

wiggers and collaborators. When I see a White kid wearing hip-hop

clothing, I still feel a strong urge to kick. And when I see a White

woman with mongrel offspring, I wish that I could call in an air strike

against New York or Washington or Philadelphia or Los Angeles; I really

have an urge to lay waste to the whole society that tolerates such

abominations.

But I understand that our task is not to kick and shoot and bomb;

instead it is to communicate and to teach. We don't need to try to

communicate with the wiggers and the collaborators now. But we do need

to communicate with those of our people capable of being positive role

models and authority figures, and we do need to continue to build our

means -- our media -- for reaching ever larger numbers of ordinary White

people: those who have not yet been completely corrupted by the aliens

who have subverted our mass media into a weapon for waging genocide

against our people.

When the time comes there will be enough punishment for those who need

it. But what most of our people need who are behaving badly now is not

punishment but good leadership, good examples. And that is what we must

strive to give them.

Thanks for being with me again today.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident

Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.

It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to: adv-list-request@NatVan.com

The subject of the message should be: Subscribe

==> TO BE REMOVED send an e-mail message to:

adv-list-request@NatVan.com

The subject of the message should be: Unsubscribe

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This

information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be

indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To comment on this broadcast, please write to: national@natvan.com To

report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site, please

write to: webmaster@natvan.com

To contact us via "snail mail," write to:

National Vanguard Books

Attention: ADVlist

P.O. Box 330

Hillsboro, WV 24946

The National Alliance: http://www.natvan.com

http://www.natall.com